2015-10-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Peter Korsgaard :
>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski writes:
>
> >> As the serial number is available on a separate i2c address, wouldn't
> >> it be simpler to handle these as special (read only) device variants and
> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski writes:
Hi,
>> > I wanted to respond that this way we would not be protected from
>> > concurrent accesses, but then I saw I didn't actually include any
>> > locks in the serial read function - my bad. It needs to be fixed as
> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski writes:
>> As the serial number is available on a separate i2c address, wouldn't
>> it be simpler to handle these as special (read only) device variants and
>> instantiate E.G. a 24c64 (for the normal data) and a 24cs64 (for
2015-10-21 13:03 GMT+02:00 Peter Korsgaard :
>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski writes:
>
> > Chips from the at24cs EEPROM series have an additional read-only memory
> area
> > containing a factory pre-programmed serial number. In order to
> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski writes:
> Chips from the at24cs EEPROM series have an additional read-only memory area
> containing a factory pre-programmed serial number. In order to access it, a
> dummy write must be executed before reading the serial