Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MTU. The MTU of your windows boxes is too big. Set it to about 1400.
Why would that affect only specific URLs consistently?
That's exactly the symptoms.
There is nothing inherently wrong with having a local MTU
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:40 PM
To: Tal, Shachar
Cc: 'Shachar Shemesh'; Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code?
snipped
The company I work for currently
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:22, Guy Teverovsky wrote:
CVS is not: version control mechanism which is content aware and action
driven. It lacks inline documentation features and code maintenance
(bugs, features) tracking...
Actually, CVS is a version control system and *that's it*.
If only the small integratable single-minded tools were *easily*
integratable, I suspect Rational would have gone of business a few years
ago.
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:38 AM
To:
Shlomo Solomon wrote:
Hi,
My network consists of my Mandrake 9.1 box and 3 Win98 machines. All 4
machines and my Alcatel ADSL modem are connected to a hub and I run iptables
with masquerading to allow the Win98 machines access to the internet. Until
recently, all machines could reach any URL.
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no idea what you're talking about.
More is the pity. Let me try to explain myself in a couple of simple
sentences. To be a good software engineer, you need to read other
people's code. To develop programs efficiently, you need to show your
code to
Hi Oleg,
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Tal, Shachar
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Shachar Shemesh'; Guy Teverovsky
Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code?
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know it is totally uncool to admit using such a vulgar application, but I have
a question about it: How can I run a certain X app, let's say xeyes, without
having its related icon in gnome-panel?
--
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:27 PM
To: Tal, Shachar
Subject: Re: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker?
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm talking about code that I gets compiled (for production)
-Original Message-
From: Leonid Podolny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Arik Baratz wrote:
Can you plese post the result of:
ssh -v -n -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xlogo
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
-- File: out.log
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:32:56PM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leonid Podolny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Arik Baratz wrote:
Can you plese post the result of:
ssh -v -n -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xlogo
-- Attached
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:54:31AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I know it is totally uncool to admit using such a vulgar application, but I have
a question about it: How can I run a certain X app, let's say xeyes, without
having its related icon in gnome-panel?
This seems like an issue of
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Oleg Goldshmidt
Of course, another problem with VC++ is that it often does not
compile perfectly legal C++ code.
More often, the code that VC++ perfectly compiles is not perfect C++
That's less of a problem in this context, isn't it? You
Hi,
I am trying to find a solution to converting this macro:
#define msg(flags, ...) do { if (MSG_TEST(flags)) x_msg((flags), __VA_ARGS__); } while
(false)
Or this one:
#define msg(flags, args...) do { if (MSG_TEST(flags)) x_msg((flags), args); } while
(false)
To something that MSVC++ will
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:22 PM
To: Tal, Shachar
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker?
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Oleg Goldshmidt
Of
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I need access to code which I am not privileged for, I ask for
it, and bang, 15 seconds later I have access to it. No big
fill-forms-in-three-copies-then-chase-disgruntled-IT-people deal.
This seems to me a contradiction to what you wrote earlier. To
Oleg Kobets wrote:
And one more thing to add to Shahar's, does your .Xauthority has the
correct permissions for your user ?
If user (leonid in your case) cannot read and write the file, then you will
get permission denied error.
Oleg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $ ls -lh ./.Xauthority
-rw---
Arik Baratz wrote:
Leonid,
Can you please do ssh -X to the machine, and then:
echo $DISPLAY
will give you something along the lines of localhost:10.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $ echo $DISPLAY
localhost:10.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $
Then take the number after the ':' (10 in this example) and
, 17 2003, 23:28,Tzafrir Cohen:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Tzafrir,
no it's the SAME thing I got last month. the funniest thing is that they
freezed cooker for 2-3 week for bug hunting. nothing was committed to
cooker in those weeks, and 1.5
I see that my question wasn't clear. I'll restate it.
When a window opens, gnome adds it automatically to its task bar, where it
shows as a rectangular button.
I would like to avoid this for xeys. How can this be done?
--
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ
Google is your friend...
Fourth from the top, searching for : variable arguments #define visual
C++
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Programming_Languages/Cplusplus/
Q_20281300.html
HTH,
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Noam Rathaus [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:07:19PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
, 17 2003, 23:28,Tzafrir Cohen:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Tzafrir,
no it's the SAME thing I got last month. the funniest thing is that they
freezed cooker for 2-3 week for bug
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Is xauth installed on the remote machine?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $ which xauth
/usr/X11R6/bin/xauth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $
What does echo $XAUTHORITY give?
There is no such variable. (?!)
Is there a ~/.Xauthority file?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] leonid $ ls ./.Xauthority
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code?
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I need access to code which I am not privileged for,
Hi,
Thank you for the answer, the problem with that solution or this that I found prior to
posting this message: http://www.codeproject.com/debug/location_trace.asp
Doesn't take into consideration the fact that MACROs are compile-time things,
consuming no CPU in run-time. So that solution
This sounds suspiciously like a bug I found lately in LyX and emailed to Dekel
Tsur IIRC. He will be working on it, but was a bit busy lately, so it could
take a few weeks. I would email him your file, so that he can see another
example of the problem. Mine was with Hebrew quotes. You could
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 08:41, Tal, Shachar wrote:
It makes it harder, as diffs are examined (by a single person or two
people) before introducing code to the main branch.
It's possible to obfuscate a backdoor, of course, but harder than
On Sunday 16 November 2003 11:13, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
You can use mlterm, xiterm (xterm with Sun's i18n code), konsole or
gnome-terminal if you want bidi support.
Konsole has bidi support? that's new to me. I always need to see my konsole
Hebrew text backwards.
= Teminal output
I think this is exactly the price you pay when choosing these kind of
tools, or more generally, doing in the unix way:
You just take some overhead explicitly onto *your* head but you are left
with very flexible, hence powerfull, set of tools, which can be combined
in numerous ways to do just
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 13:41, Noam Rathaus wrote:
(BTW, this code is taken from the OpenVPN project, which I am trying to
build a MFC based GUI for, open sourced of course)
Why bother with MFC? There are enough alternatives that build
portably and would be easier to integrate with OpenVPN
[Disclaimer: I know that not backing up your data before major update
is a bad idea. Don't tell me that, please]
I've decided to install Mandrake 9.2 on my home computer. Before, I had
a physical HD with the following partitions:
hda1 small linux (with minimal mdk9.2 installed on it) (~1.5 G)
18 2003, 15:15,Arie Folger:
You can use mlterm, xiterm (xterm with Sun's i18n code), konsole or
gnome-terminal if you want bidi support.
Konsole has bidi support? that's new to me.
at least in 3.2
--
Oded
::..
The biggest lies:
11. I never inhaled.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote about RE: Version control (was: Re: What's
wrong with this code?):
If only the small integratable single-minded tools were *easily*
integratable, I suspect Rational would have gone of business a few years
ago.
Why do they need to be easily
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance that I can recover my data from /home partition?
PS. During the installation, I did not make any changes to this partition
I had similar problem (partition table mess) a long time ago (~8 years):
* I had access
Hi,
I am not interested in a discussion on whether to use MFC or not, I just wanted to
know whether MSVC++ supports VARARGS. If I can't see any other way, I will go and try
another GUI creation environment, though I must say, I haven't been impressed with any
of them, especially QT, in the
I agree with you. Though, what Rational did that make their ClearCase
product relatively successful, is the relative ease with which you can
script their products. You can write triggers to be invoked at key steps
in their work processes, or you can dispense with their work processes
altogether
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to invest
considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches and IDE
integration and nightly building and whatnot work together. YMMV for the
definition of considerable.
I more than agree with you on the other points you
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly building and whatnot work
together. YMMV for the definition of considerable.
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:58, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly building and whatnot work
Guy Teverovsky wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:58, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 09:52, Henry Ficher wrote:
no - that wasn't the problem either.
Are you using Squid as a proxy server? If so, restart the Squid service.
I've seen this behaviour when the Squid process maxes out.
Cheers,
Henry
--
Shlomo Solomon
http://come.to/shlomo.solomon
I tend to agree - in the real world there is no magic. The
advertisements might promise so but when the worker (not the manager)
gets to actually do the work - he will need the time to learn the
promising new system. This investment time is what the ads try to
deceive us that can be saved -
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:49, Oron Peled wrote:
Sorry for the lame question, but what are magic numbers? Before working on the
raw device, I though it would be a good idea to know what I'm doing. Googling
for [magic numbers ext3 fdisk] leads to zillions mailing list archives, so
if anyone
b g wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:49, Oron Peled wrote:
Sorry for the lame question, but what are magic numbers? Before working on the
raw device, I though it would be a good idea to know what I'm doing. Googling
for [magic numbers ext3 fdisk] leads to zillions mailing list archives, so
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:28:36PM +0200, b g wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:49, Oron Peled wrote:
Sorry for the lame question, but what are magic numbers? Before working on the
raw device, I though it would be a good idea to know what I'm doing. Googling
for [magic numbers ext3
45 matches
Mail list logo
