1. When your Web site contains a blog (which may not be a problem for
Geoff's friend's Web site), the local copy upload method is not
feasible, unless designed to skip the blog part.
2. The local copy upload method does not alert you when vandalism has
actually occurred.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at
Hi Geoffrey,
I think the problem here is a business and ethical issue and not a
technical issue. The technical reality is as Omer states. That is, it
takes time and technical ability (in other words, money) to keep web sites
safe. Your friend needs to understand this and either find the money
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about Finding porn links in
hacked web pages:
He is not technicaly inclined at all, and does not have the ability
to check his pages without going to each one in a browser and looking
at the page source. He has thousands of pages and runs the
Leonid Podolny wrote:
Hi,
My employer considers purchasing a subscription to some linux journals.
I mean, paper (aka hardcopy) ones. The intended public is developers,
not sales/management, so it must be sufficiently technical. Can someone
recommend something specific?
Knowing what you guys
If you looking something nice Linux related for lobby, I could gift
you: a poster of Linux kernel:
http://www.linuxdriver.co.il/kernel_map_poster
On Jan 28, 2008 12:31 PM, Leonid Podolny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Leonid Podolny wrote:
Hi,
My employer considers
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:31:34PM +0200, Leonid Podolny wrote:
Absolutely. Some 4-5 years ago, when I had a pleasure of working with
Tzafrir, he told me about LWN and I am a happy subscriber ever since.
And it is dirt cheap for the quality of a content it provides.
However, as I understand,
Hi Geoff,
Any of these comparison suggestions are fine, but they miss the point. If
the site is hacked, the hacker can come back every day, or hour and
reinstall his links. You can be sure he already has an automated process.
You need to find the source of the break in and then plug it. After
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Leonid Podolny wrote:
Hi,
My employer considers purchasing a subscription to some linux
journals. I mean, paper (aka hardcopy) ones. The intended public is
developers, not sales/management, so it must be sufficiently
technical. Can someone recommend something
Hi Guys,
I assume there is a simple answer to this.
How do I get all of my linux workstation (all running the same version of
CentOS 4) to use the same yum cache?
Thanks,
-tom
054-244-8025
Hi,
Few days a go my rsync server stop respond.
When I tried to figure out way, I discover that rpc.statd is listen to
port 873.
Killing the rpc.statd process bypass the problem.
I'm using an updage CentOS 4.*
rsync start via xinetd.
Do you have any idea how it happen?
Thans,
Addady
Hi Tom,
My suggestion would be something like this:
1. On one of your machines, set-up a YUM server with all the packages.
See here how to do this: http://sial.org/howto/yum/
2. Point your workstations (instructions on the same page URL) to that server
3. Make sure that server download the
Hi all!
The Tel Aviv Linux club will gather again on Sunday, 3-February-2008 to hear
Sagiv Barhoom's presentation about Linux Scripting - Bash vs. Perl - head to
head. This presentation is given by popular demand due to input from the
Welcome-to-Linux series. We will meet at 18:30 at Schreiber
Rami Addady wrote:
Few days a go my rsync server stop respond.
When I tried to figure out way, I discover that rpc.statd is listen to
port 873.
Killing the rpc.statd process bypass the problem.
I'm using an updage CentOS 4.* rsync start via xinetd.
Do you have any idea how it happen?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008, Tom Rosenfeld wrote about Re: Finding porn links in
hacked web pages:
Hi Geoff,
Any of these comparison suggestions are fine, but they miss the point. If
the site is hacked, the hacker can come back every day, or hour and
reinstall his links. You can be sure he already
Hi all,
A while back I asked three Asterisk questions. Two of those were
successfully answered by the list members, but one remains:
I have four internal extensions connected to a TDM400 card using four
FXS modules (channels 1-4). I also have two Bezeq lines connected to a
second TDM400
Hi Ehud,
This sounds great and simple!
Can I use this to combine the existing cache from several machines, or will
it only work if I do it from scratch?
Thanks,
-tom
On Jan 28, 2008 5:43 PM, Ehud Karni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:00:06 Tom Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi Guys,
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 16:38 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi,
It's always fun to play with a distribution that on one side has the
latest tech, but on the other side, ditches you on the side after few
months (and only giving you choice to upgrade, or be left without
updates)
I'm using
Hi,
It's always fun to play with a distribution that on one side has the
latest tech, but on the other side, ditches you on the side after few
months (and only giving you choice to upgrade, or be left without
updates)
I'm using Fedora Core 6 on my main web server, and today I found out
that the
I am using Centos 4 and keepcache does not seem to exist yet.
It looks like it always keeps the cache.
On Jan 28, 2008 7:36 PM, Ehud Karni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:12:34 Tom Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi Ehud,
This sounds great and simple!
Can I use this to combine the
On 28/01/2008, Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's always fun to play with a distribution that on one side has the
latest tech, but on the other side, ditches you on the side after few
months (and only giving you choice to upgrade, or be left without
updates)
I'm using Fedora
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:00:06 Tom Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi Guys,
I assume there is a simple answer to this.
How do I get all of my linux workstation (all running the same version of
CentOS 4) to use the same yum cache?
Hetz gave you the better, school solution.
I have a simpler solution that
Damn :)
Well dunno, asterisk version btw... ?
On Monday 28 January 2008 18:36:21 Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Noam Rathaus wrote:
Hi,
I once had a similar issue, the TDM card was badly shipped, the modules
weren't the right one I thought they were.. i.e. FXS instead of FXO or
the other way
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:48 +0200, Rami Addady wrote:
Hi,
Few days a go my rsync server stop respond.
When I tried to figure out way, I discover that rpc.statd is listen to
port 873.
Killing the rpc.statd process bypass the problem.
I'm using an updage CentOS 4.*
rsync start via
Noam Rathaus wrote:
Hi,
I once had a similar issue, the TDM card was badly shipped, the modules
weren't the right one I thought they were.. i.e. FXS instead of FXO or the
other way around, resulting in a card having FXS with another 3 FXO (or the
other way) which caused Asterisk to confuse,
[...]
I installed Centos 5 on my home server and I update it frequently.
But Centos 5 is not for home use - its distribution does not have
media programs (like LVM, I wanted it for media streaming). So for
home/media use, may be Fedora (now 8) is better for your needs (few
RPMs are available
Hi,
Thank you for the answers, I didn't have time to check it yet, but I
will try VESA.
It should be an ATI (I don't remember by hart the exact version).
I installed there IceWM (I didn't thought to work with something
heavier then that).
Ido
On Jan 27, 2008 4:51 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL
Hi
I would prefer to maintain a local copy of the web + once a day (using cron)
to upload it to the web server
(or even better, maintain a SVN server that hold the local copy of the web)
Shahar
- Original Message -
From: Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:38:21 Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I'm using Fedora Core 6 on my main web server, and today I found out
that the security updates are no longer available for Fedora Core 6.
Worse: ATRPMS, FreshRPMS are no longer maintained for FC6 which means
that if I want the latest security
Hi,
I once had a similar issue, the TDM card was badly shipped, the modules
weren't the right one I thought they were.. i.e. FXS instead of FXO or the
other way around, resulting in a card having FXS with another 3 FXO (or the
other way) which caused Asterisk to confuse, and nothing to work
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:50 +0200, Oren Held [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myself:
But Centos 5 is not for home use - its distribution does not have
media programs (like LVM, I wanted it for media streaming). So for
home/media use, may be Fedora (now 8) is better for your needs (few
RPMs are
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:12:34 Tom Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi Ehud,
This sounds great and simple!
Can I use this to combine the existing cache from several machines, or will
it only work if I do it from scratch?
Yes, you can. Just copy all the sub directories from /var/cache/yum to
a common
I recommend you to try Google Groups. It is highly customizable list
server, and has good web access for archiving and even posting if permitted.
ronys wrote:
I'm looking for a mailing list server that is meant to serve a few hundred
users. The catch is that these are non-technical users who
My suggestion is to install a caching http proxy (e.g. squid) somewhere
on your network, and make yum go through it. As long as you all of your
CentOS hosts use the same mirror (and not a different mirror each time),
the caching http proxy will return files from its cache.
IIRC, you need
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:19:38PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
A while back I asked three Asterisk questions. Two of those were
successfully answered by the list members, but one remains:
I have four internal extensions connected to a TDM400 card using four
FXS modules
34 matches
Mail list logo
