Hi,
I live in Givatayim, and connected to the internet through HOT Bezeqint.
Also, the connection to Bezeqint is without VPN (aka. חייגן)
Apparently, I have some packet loss too. It appears like the packet loss are
occurring exactly in the connection between HOT and Bezeqint.
The following is
After having seen some E-mail messages about this subject, I decided to
run my own tests.
I found that when mtr'ing Israeli hosts, I get packet loss. When
mtr'ing international hosts (www.yahoo.com, www.google.com, zak.co.il
[hosted outside of Israel], I get less packet loss than when mtr'ing
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:32:28AM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
I found that when mtr'ing Israeli hosts, I get packet loss. When
mtr'ing international hosts (www.yahoo.com, www.google.com, zak.co.il
[hosted outside of Israel], I get less packet loss than when mtr'ing
Israeli hosts. Weird!
Not
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:25:19PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Valery Reznic wrote:
Below is important part
If the header of a file isn?t recognized
(the attempted execve(2)
returned ENOEXEC), these functions will
execute the
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I happenned to stumble on this question recently.
prctl(2) has PR_SET_NAME. An even simpler solution, that may work on non-Linux
too and may be good enough, is softlink.
From the prctl man page:
CONFORMING TO
This call is Linux-specific. IRIX has a prctl()
Hi,
Not at all. Remember that the packets have to go through gateways.
So I wonder, are those ISP's using Cisco's 1XXX/2XXX routers which
makes those packet loss?
An ISP should have a very fast equipment which shouldn't loose packet
like nuts. Thats unacceptable these days, specially when it
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:59:12AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
So I wonder, are those ISP's using Cisco's 1XXX/2XXX routers which
makes those packet loss?
An ISP should have a very fast equipment which shouldn't loose packet
like nuts. Thats unacceptable these days, specially when it comes to
Hi fellow list members,
A client of mine recently moved from H-DSL to timsoret (fractional E1)
with Netvision in Jerusalem. The client retained the same IP addresses.
Following the move we noticed that a large fraction of the SYN packets
from remote addresses do not get through to the external
The Unix team in Netvision (I think it's called Mahleket ha-system).
I don't have their phone or email unfortunately.
Hetz
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Jonathan Ben Avraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi fellow list members,
A client of mine recently moved from H-DSL to timsoret (fractional
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
What should we do next?
apt-get install hping2 (or hping3, if you prefer)
RTFM the --traceroute option. It should probably go something along the
lines of:
hping2 ip -S -p port num -M0 --traceroute
Whenever it gets stuck, press ^Z to make it skip that hop.
Do
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
What should we do next?
Oh, and I almost forgot.
When you talk to tech support, if after 10 minutes on the line you
realize that the rep will not or cannot help you, ask for a supervisor.
In most cases, if the rep cannot help you, the
I would say, give them with כפית בפה what to do. Put a capture filter
with source dest, run ping and wireshark. Either they are dumb or
don't want to do anything.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Unix team in Netvision (I think it's called Mahleket
I found out that in my case they blocked all ports except 8010. So
there is no need for QOS. But I am going to tell them.
As for hot, they use some cisco routers and some jerky
routers/switches like Juniper Networks M10 or M320 router or similar
versions of juniper.
In my case there is major
13 matches
Mail list logo
