Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
Hi, thanks for the answer (and allow me to thank following commenters to whom I reply soon as well). Please see some comment below. 2012/2/5 Jonathan Ben Avraham y...@tkos.co.il Hi Boaz, The time is not ripe. Don't waste your energy. Your school principal will not know what you are talking

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
Ori, While technically you might be correct - I'll take your word for it - this argument is hardly a relevant or helping to convince her. If I say that to her, in the best case she'll reply what the hell are you talking about Boaz? The system currently works, everyone are getting their weekly

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Etzion Bar-Noy
Because most households in israel do not buy their office... It would be stupid to assume they do. Moreover - the school headmaster does not assume that either. He/she knows most people just have their office installed, and they care nothing about it. Ez On Feb 5, 2012 9:12 AM, Nadav Harapos;El

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote: I believe my Android can read Microsoft Office documents out of the box :( But it's true, with all these non-Microsoft devices around, Microsoft's stranglehold on the word processor document seems to be coming to an

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
What are the school's arguments for not accepting a PDF? The unsurmountable difficulty of installing acroread on the teachers' computers? Or is acroread so hopelessly behind the times that it does not allow marking and annotating? If the latter, then OOO... I think the principal should agree that

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, Etzion Bar-Noy wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: Because most households in israel do not buy their office... I was hoping that even if this is true, and everybody knows this is true, no school principal would dare raise

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:04:07 +0200 From: Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org To: Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il Cc: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il, Jonathan Ben Avraham y...@tkos.co.il Subject: Re: Preparing to convince to shift to

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
It is not reasonable to ask everyone to install Acroread, or anything else that is not available by default when you buy a computer from Office Depot. You would have to send out an instruction sheet and call a parents meeting to explain why this is necessary. You think that they will do this

Re: Cat on (RAM) steroids

2012-02-05 Thread Eli Billauer
Well, the real reason is that the buffers in the kernel are allocated as DMA memory. So it's not just a matter of getting hold of a lot of memory, but a lot of memory which is continuous in its physical space. Or more precisely, a lot of continuous buffers which are fairly large. One could, of

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Etzion Bar-Noy wrote: Because most households in israel do not buy their office... It would be stupid to assume they do. Moreover - the school headmaster does not assume that either. He/she knows most people just have their office installed, and they care

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, Boaz Rymland wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: I bet it cannot read my teacher's document! Before you go and complain about some supposed facts, I think you should verify that they are really correct facts. Is OpenOffice

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Why? Forget Linux. Do Macs come with Word pre-installed (today)? How much does an Office license cost (e.g., if one runs it in WINE)? It's almost irrelevant. Most Macs come with an Apple Office suite (Pages, etc) which has little to

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, Boaz Rymland wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: I bet it cannot read my teacher's document! Before you go and complain about some supposed

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Mordechai Behar
I had a similar experience. I recently switched to a different college in a renewed attempt to gain my undergraduate in Compsci. Much to my chagrin I discovered that this college, which bills itself as being a technological college, is firmly entrenched in the Microsoft field. I tried talking to

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:14 PM, geoffrey mendelson geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote: With the high price of Macs here many parents just buy cheap PC's with Windows bundled Well, whatever the bar chart of different HW/OS sightings may be in Israel, this IMHO utterly fails as an argument

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
I wouldn't say Linux as it confused people (worked in university, don't think that it would work at school). But you can to with tablet (iPad/android). Those cost money to open word and still have a lot of issues if they do. PDF works but is not editable. Not sure if there is an editable

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote: I am ignorant of today's school procedures - whatever happened to your homework is exercises 15.1 through 15.8 in your manual? Or write down your homework at the end of the class? Or handouts? Why emailing is

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Now, I would assume that most on the parents in this discussion are qualified professionals with reasonably well paying jobs, and I would not be surprised if most had multiple computers at home, etc. Let's face it, it's not a

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:44:21AM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote: Google docs is a good but not the best alternative. Google is yet-another-corporate that even if more public friendly, not a fully M$-Office substitute. In other words: while an account at Google does not cost money,Google Docs is

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Eh, reading comprehension failure on my part again: the OP's problem is not with home assignments but with school-wide distribution such as weekly schedule. This renders the Word requirement - or even a computer requirement - even less

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
Hi, On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, geoffrey mendelson wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: It depends. I can't speak to it directly, my Hebrew level is such that a crayon would be enough, but my son who is in high school was told by the school to use

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, geoffrey mendelson wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: student/home version of office (Word and Execel but no Outlook (scheduling/email) and Access (database)) which can be found on sale for as low as 300 NIS for a three

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
2012/2/5 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com of course the whole reason to this thread and me contacting the principal is the fsck'ed up document. The document appears badly in LibreOffice and Google docs (imported). I verified this since sept. 1st till now, on a weekly basis. Yes, OO does

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
On 05/02/2012 12:14, geoffrey mendelson wrote: On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Why? Forget Linux. Do Macs come with Word pre-installed (today)? How much does an Office license cost (e.g., if one runs it in WINE)? It's almost irrelevant. Most Macs come with an Apple

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
I fully agree. Having *whatever* percentage of distributed material requiring *whatever* percentage of students to spend hundreds (or even tens) of NIS on HW/SW in order to cooperate is *totally unacceptable*especially in light of no-cost alternatives (SW only of course. HW will still be needed).

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote: 2012/2/5 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com of course the whole reason to this thread and me contacting the principal is the fsck'ed up document. The document appears badly in LibreOffice and Google docs

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
On 05/02/2012 12:45, Mordechai Behar wrote: I had a similar experience. I recently switched to a different college in a renewed attempt to gain my undergraduate in Compsci. Much to my chagrin I discovered that this college, which bills itself as being a technological college, is firmly

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
On 05/02/2012 13:57, Nadav Har'El wrote: Hi, On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, geoffrey mendelson wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: It depends. I can't speak to it directly, my Hebrew level is such that a crayon would be enough, but my son who is in

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:44:21AM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote: Google docs is a good but not the best alternative. Google is yet-another-corporate that even if more public friendly, not a fully M$-Office substitute.

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
On 05/02/2012 14:14, Nadav Har'El wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, geoffrey mendelson wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: student/home version of office (Word and Execel but no Outlook (scheduling/email) and Access (database)) which can be found on

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread sammy ominsky
On 05/02/2012, at 03:40, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Why? Forget Linux. Do Macs come with Word pre-installed (today)? How much does an Office license cost (e.g., if one runs it in WINE)? Microsoft publishes a full Office suite for Mac. Unfortunately its Hebrew capability is literally unusable.

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Micha wrote: That is not so true any more with today's kids. I don't have a kid at that age yet, but good friends of ours do and I think that about half their class are using macs (and iPods and ipads). Their child actually has to use the mother's computer half the

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Micha
On 05/02/2012 16:20, geoffrey mendelson wrote: On Feb 5, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Micha wrote: That is not so true any more with today's kids. I don't have a kid at that age yet, but good friends of ours do and I think that about half their class are using macs (and iPods and ipads). Their child

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Meir Michanie
Another issue is that at schools the kids are asked to use a site named 'ofek' which it doesn't run under linux and my kids are force to run windows in vmware,... another site that kids have access for free if they login through ofek is brainpop. It's hard to explain to your kids to suffer their

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
Even if true my point is different: my computer cannot be installed with that claimed free software from MS. My laptop runs linux and that's not somthing that is going to change, even if offered free windoze and office. Sent from my mobile phone I didn't check it and don't know how it applies

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: implementations. However relying on in-line remarks in the PDF file, which is, AFAIK, supported only by the Adobe reader, is not a good idea. I think okular handles it (RW) without a hitch. Unless you mean something

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
2012/2/5 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com on Word-HTML I think that's not the best solution. I agree. I use the opposite (HTML-doc) suggestion when i need to send something to someone who absolutely must have a Word doc, that's why i thought of it. What I didn't realize when I typed my

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote: On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:44:21AM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote: Google docs is a good but not the best alternative. Google is yet-another-corporate

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Mordechai Behar
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Micha mi...@post.tau.ac.il wrote: On 05/02/2012 14:14, Nadav Har'El wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, geoffrey mendelson wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: student/home version of office (Word and Execel but no

Re: Cat on (RAM) steroids

2012-02-05 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il wrote: Besides, I have a faint memory of a limitation on the total RAM allocatable inside the kernel. Was it 512MB? Has this limitation vanished? You can reserve more memory for kernel side processing using echo size_in_kb

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Mordechai Behar
2012/2/5 Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org 2012/2/5 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com on Word-HTML I think that's not the best solution. I agree. I use the opposite (HTML-doc) suggestion when i need to send something to someone who absolutely must have a Word doc, that's why i

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:14:09 + Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote: On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:44:21AM +0200, Boaz Rymland wrote:

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: right, but don't forget that to in order to read only a document, you don't need a google account - just a publicly readable document who's link you've got, AFAIK. That's of course hardly a full solution but I'm

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, Micha wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: I didn't check it and don't know how it applies to school children, but I was told that as a student with a valid student ID you can get a free license for MS software, renewed

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: This doesn't make any sense. Like I said, virtually everyone in the country either has school-aged children, or can easily find one - so who *won't* get a free MS license if this was the deal? Why does that not make sense? The licenses are

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 15:40:05 +0200 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote: 2012/2/5 Boaz Rymland boaz.ryml...@gmail.com of course the whole reason to this thread and me contacting the principal is the

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012, Micha wrote about Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats: I didn't check it and don't know how it applies to school children, but I was told that as a student

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Boaz Rymland wrote: yuck! So it was ok for SUN to buy StarOffice and give it away in order to reduce MS/Office sales? OpenOffice's free price and open source was a marketing tool too. Before you go you must be anti FOSS on me, bear in mind there were many

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Boaz Rymland
Nobody said that M$ is the root of evil and Sun is the source of all good. Even if the tactics and ways of M$ and Sun are equally ugly, and I really can't answer on that, the key difference is that Sun is pushing a product that first and foremost promotes open standards and that is *good*. As

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:26:51PM +0200, geoffrey mendelson wrote: On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Boaz Rymland wrote: yuck! So it was ok for SUN to buy StarOffice and give it away in order to reduce MS/Office sales? OpenOffice's free price and open source was a marketing tool too.

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oron Peled
On Sunday, 5 בFebruary 2012 15:52:45 Micha wrote: I can't seem to change page numbering (i.e suppress page numbering on some pages) or change head/footer format. One thing that microsoft does ok (but messes up a whole lot of others in return). Huh? Page-styles are your friends. You can defined

Re: Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats

2012-02-05 Thread Oron Peled
On Sunday, 5 בFebruary 2012 19:37:05 Shlomi Fish wrote: I believe recent versions of Microsoft Office support ODT (I don't know how perfectly). At least I saw it in their file formats' drop box. Stay away from this, it's a trap. Their implementation (unsurprisingly) generates ODF that isn't

Headers for network applications : include netinet/* or linux/*

2012-02-05 Thread Lev Olshvang
Morning Dear Listers, I am looking for the right solution for following problem. I came recently across some of multicast setsockopt() calls that have their structures defined in /usr/include/linux/ directory. But you cannot leave without arpa/net functions such as htons() and alike. But