to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd.
Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, city.holon, Gush-Dan, country.israel
58495
Phone: +972-03
so he can actually halt the machine (for instance by running an
installation process which removes critical files) or render the machine
unbootable. In Linux he could just launch applications and not hurt anyone
but himself. Quite an improvement.
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research
at the Nobel
prize awards...:)
Cheers,
Mark
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd.
Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, city.holon, Gush-Dan, country.israel
58495
Phone: +972-03-5581310
Fax: +972-03-5581310
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http
On Saturday 06 September 2003 21:47, you wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure I am using the correct terminology. I am looking for a
tool that can download HTML pages and content given a URL as starting
point. On MS I used teleport pro (Got a license) What tool is available
on Linux?
David!
On the cmd
Hello all!
I wanted to see how to the following ideas will fly with the open source
crowd in view of SCO latest outrageous behaviour:
0. Make clean ./configure fail on SCO systems by modifying autoconf.
User could still compile but not by default (special flags
to ./configure
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:01:41PM +0300, Arik Baratz wrote:
But there are other implications to this form of activism. Soon some guy who doesn't
like some country will add a clause to the O/S license banning use in that
country... Not a good precedent.
The owner of a project is entitled
developer who is the right person to run the Linux kernel
project. If only the world had a 100 more traitors like him!!!
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd.
Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon, Gush-Dan, Israel 58495
Phone: +972-03-5508163
Fax
,
Mark
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd.
Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon, Gush-Dan, Israel 58495
Phone: +972-03-5508163
Fax: +972-03-5508163
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.veltzer.org
OpenSource: CPAN, user: VELTZER, mailto:[EMAIL
because they are written better). In any case you can hire
a kernel hacker to write a device driver for just about anything these days,
or, if you have enough weight, try to convince the hardware manufacturor to
write one.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Name: Mark Veltzer
Title: Research
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:56 am, you wrote:
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
Too much in favour of BSD as compared to Linux...:). Almost all the points are
history today and it only goes to show the fast rate of Linux progress...
On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:00 pm, you wrote:
Not expressing any constructive opinion, your paragraph here is just saying
that BSD guys are more professional.
That depends on your definition of professional. If professional is careful
up to the point of stagnation then professional is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all!
Can anybody recommend any that are known to work well under Linux ?
BTW: same goes for scanners:)
Is the Linux hardware database up to date ? (meaning is the info there any
good ?)
Cheers,
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 November 2002 01:31, you wrote:
Comments welcome.
Just one comment: Great stuff. Since most distros come with PPPoE and not
PPTP it makes installing Bezeq ADSL a little easier for newbie Linux users.
Thanks for writing the document.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 11:44, you wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:11:50AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
We've had a thread recently about ccache and potential pitfalls. johnm
on advogato has discovered one such pitfall. The details:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all!
I have a standard Alcatel modem for Bezeq ADSL and I wanted to know if it can
be used to send faxes in any way ?
Thanks,
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all!
I have a standard Alcatel modem for Bezeq ADSL and I wanted to know if it can
be used to send faxes in any way ?
Thanks,
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 October 2002 01:51, you wrote:
yeah, yeah, heard you the first time...
Sorry about the double post. Problem with my email client.
ofcourse you can use your line for faxes, it's a standard SL (albeint
DSL) and still works as POTS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 14:27, you wrote:
Sorry for being rude, but ...
This is the storry
Several weeks ago, I updated RH7.3 to 8.0 version using update all
option. Even though I didn't asked the installation program to remove any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 14 October 2002 12:37, you wrote:
Hi,
What would be the way to backup an entire system ?
I have a server which I need too backup, a complete
backup setups, *-conf, data, everything and then to
easily rebuild the entire server back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 14 October 2002 13:08, you wrote:
I think that he didn't look for backup tools, but asked what's wrong
with a dumb copy, and if a dumb copy can be used instead of tools like
Ghost and mindi/mondo.
Since this question bothers me too,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 12 October 2002 21:41, you wrote:
Hi List,
I tend to concur with Oded,
The first problem is that Linux advocates usually do not understand just
how unusable and inappropriate Linux is for the average person, which
leads to the second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 00:13, you wrote:
On Monday 07 October 2002 16:01, Alon Barzilai wrote:
mount -t iso9660 -o ro 1.iso /mnt/disk1
mount -t iso9660 -o ro 2.iso /mnt/disk1
This is called union mount. Linux does not have this feature (I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 19:23, you wrote:
MPEG-2 --- maybe RealNetwork new open source technology??? who
knows?
I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's supposed to be a sort of
Meta-Format for binary streamed media so if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux-il and Linux-kernel as fairly close on my contacts list...:)
Sorry...:(
Regards,
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 28 September 2002 02:07, you wrote:
Basically, it competes with make for
dependency tracking. It seems to try to do it in a smart way, but
having two tools trying to outsmart each other seeds doubt in my mind.
This doubt may have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here are my thoughts on the matter (as if anyone cares what they are...:):
1. No commercial company has EVER produced a portable kernel (a real portable
kernel - no branches like solaris or windows on alpha). This is probably due
to the patience
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 September 2002 21:50, you wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here are my thoughts on the matter (as if anyone cares what they
are...:):
1. No commercial company
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 September 2002 22:17, you wrote:
NB: marked OT with respect to the actual topic of the thread. Not entirely
OT for the list, I suppose.
Mark Veltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... and I will continue feeding trolls who contribute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 12:32, you wrote:
the statistical chance that such a case will happen, is
almost zero. So when it happens, it's exciting.
The statistics become much higher when you realize that:
1. Redhat wants to change the buggy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 18:01, you wrote:
Wrong in both terms:
1. GCC 2.96 to me seems very stable these days - and I have more then
enough compile expirience with it (I use 2.96 only up until few days ago).
It had few problems when it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 September 2002 01:41, you wrote:
Hi fellows..
I was wondering if someone could share his/her experience with vanilla
kernel 2.4.19
I have used so far (in the last few months at least) RedHat's 2.4.18
kernel, but it seem my board
31 matches
Mail list logo
