On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
volunteers.
say no more.
Max K. wrote:
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
volunteers.
say no more.
I seriously considered masking the fact that it's a she to prevent
precisely these kind of remarks. I think we had enough bad taste and
self humiliation the last time this subject
Max K. wrote:
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
volunteers.
say no more.
OH look! Max has got a willie!
Way to go, Max. You are a truly Israeli male.
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I will flame anyone I want.
Official
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find
I may be a bit paranoid here, but I think there may be implications
you're not aware of.
what is some criminal element takes advantage of this list ? (wether sex
or property
crime, or even terrorists; remember the poor 16-yr old who got seduced
to ramalla
thru the internet, and then
Guy Baruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ?
cause something tells me you will, eventually ...
I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal
entity as far as I can tell) can be held responsible for financial
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ?
cause something tells me you will, eventually ...
I can see mas-hachnasa supina-ing his records, or interogating him.
I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal
entity
I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define
some variable, and it will be used in the next target, something
like this:
ppc :
ARCH = PPC
release:
ifeq ($(ARCH),PPC)
echo start ppc compiler with ppc flags
else
echo do something else
endif
And I
Michael Sternberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define
some variable, and it will be used in the next target,
Use recursive make:
ppc:
$(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Following some requests for lectures about Linux at Tel-Aviv University (
Ariel Biner Didi Bar-David talked about it over the mailing list) - it
comes to be true.
For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays.
The coming lectures appear on the web site:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find
Who is paying for this?
(sorry, the start of the thread didn't get to my mailbox)
I will gladly except this work.
Please see my references at http://www.uadm.com
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar
Michael Sternberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I run it with make ppc debug and wait to see
performing debug build for PPC
I misunderstood your question. It's simpler, actually:
make debug ARCH=PPC
will work - what's wrong with that?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Use recursive make:
ppc:
$(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
It does not work.
Here is a simple makefile:
ppc:
@ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
debug:
@ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH
release:
@ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH
I run it with make ppc debug and
Quoting Eddie Aronovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays.
At 18:00. Darn. I've been wishing to attend regular linux lectures, but you
know, not all Linux enthusiasts are unemployed. 18:00 on a weekday is not
feasible for anybody in the private
feasible for anybody in the private sector. If it was moved even a half hour
forward it would be more reasonable - allows one to get out of work and get to
TAU, if one is in TA/RG.
A full hour forward is even better, so that I don't have to miss my
Discrete Math lecture :-)
Alexander (aka
I'll definately be attending. However, I'd like to suggest re-arranging the priorities
a little :-)
Seems more logical, at least to me, to have printing and hardware issues before
development and the web server thing. Just a thought...
Eli
04/12/02 13:57:24, Eddie Aronovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did not try reinstalling RH7.3, but got it right anyway, although only with
mplayer.
The problem (for future reference, for google searches):
I installed xine, videolan::client (vlc), ogle and mplayer, all from
freshrpms.net, all for RedHat 8.0. All dependency problems where solved.
However,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Use recursive make:
ppc:
$(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
It does not work.
Here is a simple makefile:
ppc:
@ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
obviously, you did not read what oleg wrote - and modified his suggestion.
the above
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, guy keren wrote:
Makefiles should not be medled with. if you try to do something
complicated - most likely you'll fail, cause the language that gmake (and
the commercial 'make' variants) supports - are very very limited.
A chalange, then, ha?
(reading the gnu-make
guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Use recursive make:
ppc:
$(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
It does not work.
Here is a simple makefile:
ppc:
@ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
obviously, you did not read what oleg
21 matches
Mail list logo
