Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux - thanks and report

2003-09-20 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Hi, I figured I should report my experiences with my brand new digital camera and say thanks to everybody who provided input. In the end, I got a Nikon CoolPix 3100 at the Ben Gurion Duty Free shop for $399. I figured it was not a bad price, considering that most quotes on the net were in the

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux - thanks and report

2003-09-20 Thread Idan Sofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 20 September 2003 13:46, you wrote: Xine shows MOV's just fine in full screen mode. GPhoto does a fair job showing pictures but leaves much to be desired in terms of presentation capabilities, compared to the NikonView I tried on the XP

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux - thanks and report

2003-09-20 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt: An Olympus camera with similar technical characteristics cost around $530. The main difference, at least according to the shop assistant (not a great authority, I know), was that the Olympus had a sturdier and heavier metal body (Nikon is plastic). I figured that I

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread John Rabkin
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 07:35:29PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Hi, I am considering getting a digital camera (for amateur, not professional, use), with the obvious requirement that it will interact flawlessly with my Linux computers (desktops and laptop). I've searched TFW, found some

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread David Howard
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 19:35, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Hi, I am considering getting a digital camera (for amateur, not professional, use), with the obvious requirement that it will interact flawlessly with my Linux computers (desktops and laptop). [snipped] Info relevant to makes and models

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a physicist by training. ;-) Is the 2Mpx number anything deeper than

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Alex Shnitman
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:18, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a physicist by

GIMP [was Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux]

2003-09-12 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote: Quoth Geoffrey S. Mendelson: GIMP is an excelent photo editor. Photoshop is better because there are more features, more commercial plug-ins and better documentation. For Photoshop has more features than GIMP? From when? FYI, out

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a physicist by training. ;-) Yes, and I would gladly discuss the subject with anyone at any

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread linux-il
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the best way to use a digital camera is to treat the memory cards as film. You buy several of them acording to your needs and replace one when it gets full. What's wrong with dumping files onto a hard

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Alex Shnitman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, you haven't yet said anything about your budget... I think more information in that direction would help a lot. It is somewhat stretchable: I would very much prefer to get something under $300, but if a somewhat higher price gets me a

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Boaz Rymland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's going to be an ad, but they earned it - Go to Jugend Brothers (pronounced Yugend) at 5 Hayarkon St. in Tel-Aviv. They are a pro shop and their prices are fair and their advice is good (I could have bought my camera there for almost the same price as abroad, only

[OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Hi, I am considering getting a digital camera (for amateur, not professional, use), with the obvious requirement that it will interact flawlessly with my Linux computers (desktops and laptop). I've searched TFW, found some general info etc, not much about specific models. Could not try

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Oleg, I am considering getting a digital camera (for amateur, not professional, use), with the obvious requirement that it will interact flawlessly with my Linux computers (desktops and laptop). I found that the best way to use a digital camera is to treat the memory cards as film. You buy

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Hi, Just my two cents: forget about serial and stick to USB. Many cameras I have heard people use with linux look just like a USB storage to the OS. So what you need is to load usb-storage module and mount. be On 11 Sep 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Hi, I am considering getting a

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the best way to use a digital camera is to treat the memory cards as film. You buy several of them acording to your needs and replace one when it gets full. What's wrong with dumping files onto a hard disk from time to time? You

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread guy keren
On 11 Sep 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the best way to use a digital camera is to treat the memory cards as film. You buy several of them acording to your needs and replace one when it gets full. What's wrong withdumping

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
On Thursday 11 September 2003 19:35, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: I'm not much of a photographer, but I own a digital camera and connected quite a few of them to Linux. I have yet to find a single camera that works as a USB storage device that *doesn't* connect to Linux. I'm sure there such variants

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Geoffrey S. Mendelson: GIMP is an excelent photo editor. Photoshop is better because there are more features, more commercial plug-ins and better documentation. For home use, I doubt the $700 for Photoshop (plus a Windows PC or Mac) is worth it. I agree about Photoshop, but the

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Boaz Rymland
Might I join this OT frenzy? I've purchased a digital camera lately too. Below is the little I've found regarding local tutorials on purchasing such a camera:

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: What's wrong with dumping files onto a hard disk from time to time? You can re-use the memory, can't you? Sorry, I meant as you were shooting the pictures. It does not make sense to stop and dump them to a laptop in the middle of a trip, birthday party, etc. After the