On Mon, 22 May 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
ssh needs to generate a host key on installation, and do it in /mnt/etc
instead of /etc if done in the CD install stage. does it do that
correctly?
No. The installer runs chrooted at that stage.
The issue is a bit different. For some strange reason
commercial. I
suspect there is a difference in encription, and I don't know which
is shipped by KRUD.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Inventions ... cannot, in nature, be a subject of property."
T. Jefferson.
=
of US.
Besides, there are 2 versions, commerciall and non-commercial. I
suspect there is a difference in encription, and I don't know which
is shipped by KRUD.
if it was that simple redhat and everybody would have sold it
too. Mandrake, which is in France, doesn't include it on the CD
either
Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if it was that simple redhat and everybody would have sold it
too. Mandrake, which is in France, doesn't include it on the CD
either. there ARE legal problems with it.
I suspect it's licensing (not GPL, free for "non-commercial" use)
that precludes
not be a problem with shipping it outside of US.
Besides, there are 2 versions, commerciall and non-commercial. I
suspect there is a difference in encription, and I don't know which
is shipped by KRUD.
The ssh packages come in two versions: a "us" one, that us
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
The ssh packages come in two versions: a "us" one, that users RSAREF, and
an "international" one, that doesn't.
and neither is allowed to be exported from the USA. although they were
first IMported to begin with, doesn't matter (yes, weird law)
ssh1
guess that each one has its own
advantages. If you ask me, I would say that KRUD's advantages are:
1. More up-to-date (KRUD is based on the April 2000 versions of the
various packages, while Mandrake 7 is based on MUCH older versions).
2. For RH lovers, KRUD is more synchronized with RH (it's
Does anybody have any experience with this distro? Is it better/safer
to install and use the latest version of it in comparison with the
original RH6.2?
--
Eli Marmor
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word
On Fri, May 19, 2000, Eli Marmor wrote about "KRUD":
Does anybody have any experience with this distro? Is it better/safer
to install and use the latest version of it in comparison with the
original RH6.2?
I don't know this distribution. Can you give us a reference? Krud.com an
EM Does anybody have any experience with this distro? Is it better/safer
EM to install and use the latest version of it in comparison with the
EM original RH6.2?
I Installed 6.0 from KRUD, IIRC. The same as RH only some RPMS are updated
(from RH updates, I guess) and some are added (don't
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2000, Eli Marmor wrote about "KRUD":
Does anybody have any experience with this distro? Is it better/safer
to install and use the latest version of it in comparison with the
original RH6.2?
I don't know this distribution. Can you give us a
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
Anyway, the link is http://www.tummy.com/krud/
I'm looking over it, and I'm not too sure what they do "better". they
include a few useful RPMs like ssh and ssl that can't come from RHAT
(and I have no idea how they can ship it on CD to non-US de
wrote:
Anyway, the link is http://www.tummy.com/krud/
I'm looking over it, and I'm not too sure what they do "better". they
include a few useful RPMs like ssh and ssl that can't come from RHAT
(and I have no idea how they can ship it on CD to non-US destinations,
but they
:-)
and there is also PHP Firewall Generator http://phpfwgen.sourceforge.net/
and for that you need to install PHP too, right?
we only need something simple for beginners. installing php is not in
that category.
but the point is right, there are FREE alternatives. so, still: what's
so great about KRUD
14 matches
Mail list logo
