and what's with pine+imap? (was: Re: Suggentions for server side spam control)

2003-12-31 Thread guy keren
i tried checking for the possibility to have spam filtering with the following configuration: remote mail server, accessed using 'pine', via an imap server. - thus, i cannot install a spam-filter on the remote server. - the local procmail is never activated, and thus seems to be un-useable

Re: and what's with pine+imap? (was: Re: Suggentions for server side spam control)

2003-12-31 Thread guy keren
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Alon Altman wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, guy keren wrote: i tried checking for the possibility to have spam filtering with the following configuration: remote mail server, accessed using 'pine', via an imap server. - thus, i cannot install a spam-filter on the

RE: and what's with pine+imap? (was: Re: Suggentions for server sidespam control)

2003-12-31 Thread Arik Baratz
-Original Message- From: guy keren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] i'm beginning to think i'm asking for the imposible - to filter the letter, i need to first download it. however, i should be able to filter out by the message headers that _are_ downloaded by imap, thus eliminating a

Re: and what's with pine+imap?

2003-12-31 Thread Gil Freund
How about an imap proxy? SpamAssasign has such a feature, IIRC. This means that you Pine will connect to an IMAP server in localhost which will then query the remote IMAP server. guy keren wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Alon Altman wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, guy keren wrote: i tried checking

Re: and what's with pine+imap? (was: Re: Suggentions for server side spam control)

2003-12-31 Thread Baruch Even
* guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031231 23:22]: i tried checking for the possibility to have spam filtering with the following configuration: remote mail server, accessed using 'pine', via an imap server. is there any solution, _WITHOUT_ replacing the mail client, and without reverting to