On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote:
I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's supposed to be a sort of
Meta-Format for binary streamed media so if you wanted to put video in Ogg
you could. I also undestood that the video enhancements are already in the
making. Anybody who knows
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Oron Peled wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:53:29 +0200
Mark Veltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 October 2002 19:23, you wrote:
MPEG-2 --- maybe RealNetwork new open source technology??? who
knows?
I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's
07/10/02 01:31:04, Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
áéåí øàùåï, 6 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 19:38, Dvir Volk ëúá:
I highly doubt it's legal. I've looked in fraunhofer's site, which
refered me to an mp3 licensing site, that said:
snip
From that QA it seems to me that developers are required to get a
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 01:31:04 +0200
Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is unlike the GIF issue where Unisys wants you to buy a license if your
GIFs were not created by a licensed software - even if the files were not
created by you.
Licensing terms may be modified at a moments notice.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 19:23, you wrote:
MPEG-2 --- maybe RealNetwork new open source technology??? who
knows?
I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's supposed to be a sort of
Meta-Format for binary streamed media so if you
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:53:29 +0200
Mark Veltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 October 2002 19:23, you wrote:
MPEG-2 --- maybe RealNetwork new open source technology??? who
knows?
I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's supposed to be a sort of
Meta-Format for binary
04/10/02 13:39:57, Mark Veltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is so strange ? MP3 is a COPYRIGHTED format. A german research
institution holds the copy right and has started to sue companies who
distribute mp3 players without paying them royalties (since they can't sue
the users themselves
04/10/02 15:58:09, Amir Tal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 October 2002 11:28 am, voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS
04/10/02 14:11:16, Oleg Kobets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, you can easily d/l the missing rpm from xmms website.
Oleg.
And is THAT legal ?? Those libraries use a technology which is
patented, how is that allowed ???
Eli
There's so many different worlds
So many different suns
And we
]]On Behalf Of voguemaster
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Linux-IL
Subject: Re: xmms rh8
04/10/02 14:11:16, Oleg Kobets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, you can easily d/l the missing rpm from xmms website.
Oleg.
And is THAT legal ?? Those libraries use a technology which
xmms.org were registered.
http://mp3licensing.com/licensees/index.asp
-Original Message-
From: voguemaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Linux-IL
Subject: Re: xmms rh8
04/10/02 14:11:16, Oleg Kobets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, you can
On Friday 04 October 2002 19:10, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002, voguemaster wrote about Re: xmms rh8:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS
áéåí øàùåï, 6 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 19:38, Dvir Volk ëúá:
I highly doubt it's legal. I've looked in fraunhofer's site, which
refered me to an mp3 licensing site, that said:
snip
From that QA it seems to me that developers are required to get a license,
but not users - you are expected to use a
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:39:57 +0300
Mark Veltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 October 2002 14:28, you wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
Eli
What is so strange ? MP3 is a COPYRIGHTED format. A german
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS ??
This makes me think twice about this release..
Eli
04/10/02 04:40:42, Amir Sela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Friday 04 October 2002 11:28 am, voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS
?? This makes me think twice about this release..
who uses
mp3 technology to pay them per product sold.
Besides, you can easily d/l the missing rpm from xmms website.
Oleg.
- Original Message -
From: voguemaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux-IL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: xmms rh8
Honestly I
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
On Friday 04 October 2002 11:28 am, voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS
?? This
On Friday 04 October 2002 14:13, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
General discomfort of the fact that mp3 is a problematic by a patents, and
that the patent holder can change the license terms at any desirable
moment? Probably.
Patented technologies are doomed to dissapear.
As we all switched to png and
Patented technologies are doomed to dissapear.
Indeed, but only because every patent has its expiration date...
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS ??
This makes me think twice about this release..
RedHat already had to pull off all
* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - *
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at
http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ilya Konstantinov
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:20 PM
Cc: Linux-IL
Subject: Re: xmms rh8
voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I
AT they did it because of piracy issues. you can always get the
AT plugin's and add them manually.
Just a second. Is it real RH statement that mp3 format equals piracy
(which means, unofrtunately, that RH management has completely lost his
mind) or it is what you personally think?
--
[EMAIL
On Friday 04 October 2002 02:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT they did it because of piracy issues. you can always get the
AT plugin's and add them manually.
Just a second. Is it real RH statement that mp3 format equals piracy
(which means, unofrtunately, that RH management has completely
at
http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ilya Konstantinov
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:20 PM
Cc: Linux-IL
Subject: Re: xmms rh8
voguemaster wrote:
Honestly I don't quite get
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002, voguemaster wrote about Re: xmms rh8:
Honestly I don't quite get it.
How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS ??
This makes me think twice about this release
Hi list:
I installed rh8 and xmms was unable to play mp3,
running rpm -ql xmms I saw that libmpeg123.so and libmpeg123.la was
missing from the packet. So I copied from another machine running rh7.3
Isn't it weird?
--
QOTD:
I tried buying a goat instead of a lawn tractor; had to return
On Thursday 03 October 2002 23:56, Meir Michanie wrote:
Hi list:
I installed rh8 and xmms was unable to play mp3,
running rpm -ql xmms I saw that libmpeg123.so and libmpeg123.la was
missing from the packet. So I copied from another machine running rh7.3
Isn't it weird?
From
28 matches
Mail list logo
