Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > Is there a limit? > I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size. > Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel > before 2.4

Re: dvd mounting troubles

2000-10-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rick Haines wrote: > It works fine in Win2k. After reading Andre's comment I think it could > be a udf problem as well because iso9660 cd's work fine. In fact, after > mounting an iso9660 cdr I can now mount dvd's every try. I tend to agree that it is FS layer and not so

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread David Ford
Andreas Dilger wrote: > Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > X, and any other big friendly processes, could participate in > > memory balancing operations. X could be made to clean out a > > Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > Anyway, there is/was an API in PTX to say (either from in-kernel or through > > some

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + Winchip2/2A processor family == hang on boot

2000-10-09 Thread Frank de Lange
Hi Dave, I tried the patch, but the result is the same... Uncompressing Linux..., now booting the kernel..., NOTHING These Winchips need all the help they can get, so if you know something else I might try... Cheers//Frank -- W ___ ## o o\/ Frank de

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan? I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Andreas Dilger
> Rik van Riel wrote: > > > How about SIGTERM a bit before SIGKILL then re-evaluate the OOM > > > N usecs later? > > > > And run the risk of having to kill /another/ process as well ? > > > > I really don't know if that would be a wise thing to do > > (but feel free to do some tests to see if

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:44:34 +0200 From: Jorg de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> attached you will find my patch again Patch applied, thanks for being so patient. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

RAID setup

2000-10-09 Thread Anil kumar
Hi, I want to setup RAID. I am working on kernel version 2.2.12. I am using RAID patches available. I create a RAID configuring file called /etc/raidtab #mkraid /dev/md0/*md0 is the device I am selecting*/ After this when I check /proc/mdstat , I find

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Philipp Rumpf
> If init dies the kernel hangs solid anyway Init should never die. If we get to do_exit in init we'll panic which is the right thing to do (reboot on critical systems). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

spurious 8259A interrupt?

2000-10-09 Thread Daniel Lange
Periodically, I get the following error with the 2.4.0test9 kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. I did not receive this error with the 2.0.36 kernel that came stock on my slack installation. However, 2 things have been changed; I configured the PAS16 to use IRQ7 (I don't recall its exact

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Philipp Rumpf
> (but I'd be curious if somebody actually manages to > trick the OOM killer into killing init ... please > test a bit more to see if this really happens ;)) In a non-real-world situation, yes. (mem=3500k, many drivers, init=/bin/bash, tried to enter a command). Since the process in question

[PATCH]: fixing swapon memory leak against 2.4.0-test10-pre1

2000-10-09 Thread Juan J. Quintela
Hi Linus I just resend this patch (the first time I forgot to put the [PATCH] field). It fixes a leak in swapon reported by marcelo quite time ago. Later, Juan. > "marcelo" == Marcelo de Paula Bezerra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi sorry for the delay (this problem has

RE: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> > Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver, > > which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker > > buttons, any-old-kind-of buttons, toaster buttons, etc. > > > > OTOH, if you want just some basic USB mouse & keyboard support, > > you don't have to use the

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > how about registering the full path (or inode number of the executable?), > the owner, and an optional high water mark of memory consumption, over > which the process is considered to be leaking memory and gets added to the > algorithm of processes

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread lamont
how about registering the full path (or inode number of the executable?), the owner, and an optional high water mark of memory consumption, over which the process is considered to be leaking memory and gets added to the algorithm of processes to kill? this is because while normally i want to

Re: When do release linux-2.0.39

2000-10-09 Thread Seiichi Nakashima
> > Dear. > > > > I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine. > > I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39, > > > > when do relese linux-2.0.39? > > Well, I'm still investigating some problems that some users are > experiencing. However, if I can't resolve those within a reasonable > time, I'll release

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:25:38PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > echo "init" > /proc/sys/oom-ignore > > echo "httpd" >> /proc/sys/oom-ignore > > echo "parallel-fft" >> /proc/sys/oom-ignore > > etc... > > I'd be concerned with the security

Re: dvd mounting troubles

2000-10-09 Thread Rick Haines
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Rick Haines wrote: > > I'm having real trouble mounting a dvd (udf filesystem) in my Pioneer > > 104S drive. It usually failes with: > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/dvd, > >or

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:25:38PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jochen Striepe wrote: > > What about a user-defined list of "wishes"? The administrator should be > > enabled to enforce that specific processes are to be terminated only as a > > last resource (syslogd), or

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jochen Striepe wrote: > Hi, a question regarding the OOM process killer... > > Hmm, sometimes daemon-like processes (e.g. web servers) only need root > privileges to open a network port<1024 - you may start them as non-root > if they do not need such a privileged port.

Oops with USB mouse

2000-10-09 Thread Adam Huffman
This has suddenly started happening tonight. Also happens with test9 and test10-pre1 but they lock-up hard, to the extent that Atl-SysRQ+B is needed, box doesn't respond to pings etc. The only thing that's changed recently is the addition of a new PS/2 keyboard. My first Oops report so

Re: linux-2.4.0-test9

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:19:20 -0700 From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Seems to me that if you want to play games and be sure that they stay played, that you'd have to put all the variables into a struct. Indeed, I've hacked this up and will send the fix to linus.

Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger

2000-10-09 Thread richardj_moore
>Hence, yes I can provide an interface from the kernel to log a trace event >with a variable length buffer, but I don't think that taking away the statically >defined trace points is the right thing to do. (I might have gotten this >completely wrong, though ... My presumption about your

Re: 3dfx voodoo5 framebuffer patch...(w/actual patch this time)

2000-10-09 Thread Aaron Botsis
whoops. Here's a resend with the actual patch attached. :) one of those days I guess? Attached is a patch to include 3dfx voodoo5 framebuffer support. Looking for comments. Doesn't do much other than check for the voodoo5 device id. It also doesn't do anything voodoo5 specific. (voodoo5 is

Re: [OT] Linux running on an AMD Duron-700Mhz

2000-10-09 Thread Michael Meding
Hi there, redhat 6.2 will (should) install on this system. Maybe you have to use the upgraded driver / update disk and maybe you have to use text install. However, the installed kernel will fail during boot because it tries to disable the cpuid serial number on your system (of course there isn't

Re: When do release linux-2.0.39

2000-10-09 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:08:13AM +0900, Seiichi Nakashima wrote: > Dear. > > I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine. > I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39, > > when do relese linux-2.0.39? Well, I'm still investigating some problems that some users are experiencing. However, if I can't resolve

When do release linux-2.0.39

2000-10-09 Thread Seiichi Nakashima
Dear.   I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine. I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39,   when do relese linux-2.0.39?  

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Harold Oga
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:19:37PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: >I'm not sure this is correct -- the options that this if conditional >controls are the Keyboard and Mouse _Boot_Protocol_ support, which is >separate form the regular HID support -- I believe it's for motherboards >which can boot

Re: Window Scale Option broken in 2.2.x

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
See Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt, section "tcp_mem". Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[OT] Linux running on an AMD Duron-700Mhz

2000-10-09 Thread Graham TerMarsch
First, my apologies for an OT request here. We recently upgraded one of our machines here to a Duron 700Mhz running on a QDI mainboard, and haven't been able to get a few recent Linux distros to install reasonably on it. RH6.2 installs but chokes constantly whenever we exit the X-server

Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List

2000-10-09 Thread Decklin Foster
Mitchell Blank Jr writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 4. Boot Time Failures > [...] > > * IBM Thinkpad 390 won't boot since 2.3.11 (See Decklin Foster for > >more info) > > I _highly_ suspect that this is not a 2.4 bug but is instead user error. > I've seen it several times.

Re: 2.4-9 kernel: APIC error on CPU

2000-10-09 Thread Gnea
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:29:53 +0200, Lars Callenbach blurted forth: > Hallo, > > I´m trying the 2.4-9 kernel and sometimes it crashes. I haven´t found any hint for >the crashes but I´ve got messages like the following one in /var/log/messages: [snip] > Perhaps someone can explain what

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Miles Lane
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote: > Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver, > which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker > buttons, any-old-kind-of buttons, toaster buttons, etc. > > OTOH, if you want just some basic USB mouse & keyboard support, > you don't have

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
> > I didn't realize USB had this level of functionality. > > Hrm... I wonder if anyone out there is making USB Toasters That would > be really nice -- have a nice snack waiting for me when I get home, etc. ;) I remember someone made a /dev/coffee to control their coffe machine. Do a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Updated 2.4 TODO List

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:17:01PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > . OOPS in usb-storage from the error-recovery handler. {CRITICAL} > (Matthew Dharm; [EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is fixed as of test9. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Miles Lane
Matthew Dharm wrote: > > I'm not sure this is correct -- the options that this if conditional > controls are the Keyboard and Mouse _Boot_Protocol_ support, which is > separate form the regular HID support -- I believe it's for motherboards > which can boot from a USB keyboard. > > Can somone

[PATCH] 2.4.0-test10-pre1

2000-10-09 Thread Keith Owens
Every nit needs picking. Index: 0-test10-pre1.1/Makefile --- 0-test10-pre1.1/Makefile Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:24:51 +1100 kaos (linux-2.4/B/c/27_Makefile 1.1.2.2.2.4.1.7.1.3.1.5.2.5 644) +++ 0-test10-pre1.1(w)/Makefile Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:33:03 +1100 kaos +(linux-2.4/B/c/27_Makefile

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:31:08AM -0700, James Simmons wrote: > > Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver, > > which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker > > buttons, any-old-kind-of buttons, toaster buttons, etc. > > I didn't realize USB had this level

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Jens, > > DVD should always use UDF? This may explain what we are seeing as well. Yes, that is the preferred way of doing it. -- * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

RE: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
> Not needed. This is a misunderstanding. Maybe that needs > some work (in Help maybe), but not this patch. Yes please. It can be very misleading. > Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver, > which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker > buttons,

[RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Byron Stanoszek
What I'd personally like to see in the OOM should cover the following scenarios, theoretically: 1. User does a malloc() bomb. This should be caught instantly and killed when there is no memory left to allocate. This covers tons of low-sized mallocs() as well as a timed delay infinite

RE: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Not needed. This is a misunderstanding. Maybe that needs some work (in Help maybe), but not this patch. You have the first USB option ("Support for USB") set to Y, right? Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver, which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads,

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jorg de Jong wrote: > your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug > a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this > bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback > on why ? the address

Re: test [PATCH] new vgacon and vga16fb Part II

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
Oops. Sorry folks. My patch was too big to be posted on the mailing list. Uncompressed it is 63K. Here it is compressed. >Hi! > > This patch places code common to both vgacon and vga16fb into a common >file (vga.c). The utlimate goal is to have the ability to go from vgacon >to fbcon and back.

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> This patch fixes a minor config error for drivers/usb/Config.in. When you > select USB Human Interface Device (HID) support I assume you should be > able to select a USB mouse and/or USB keyboard. With the current Config.in you can't. HIDBP is an alternative the existing code is correct. -

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread Matthew Dharm
I'm not sure this is correct -- the options that this if conditional controls are the Keyboard and Mouse _Boot_Protocol_ support, which is separate form the regular HID support -- I believe it's for motherboards which can boot from a USB keyboard. Can somone on the linux-usb-devel mailinglist

[CFT][PATCH] ext2 directories in pagecache

2000-10-09 Thread Alexander Viro
New variant of ext2 patch is available. Patch is against -test9 and -test10-pre1 and it lives on ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro/ext2-patch-9e.gz Interface between namei.c and dir.c remains the same, dir.c got serious cleanup compared to the previous version. Handling of records with

[PATCH] drivers/usb/Config.in

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
This patch fixes a minor config error for drivers/usb/Config.in. When you select USB Human Interface Device (HID) support I assume you should be able to select a USB mouse and/or USB keyboard. With the current Config.in you can't. --- Config.in.orig Tue Oct 10 00:10:06 2000 +++ Config.in

test [PATCH] new vgacon and vga16fb

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
Hi! This patch places code common to both vgacon and vga16fb into a common file (vga.c). The utlimate goal is to have the ability to go from vgacon to fbcon and back. At present you can't do this. This will allow for easier debugging in the future for fbdev drivers. - To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Jim Gettys
"Albert D. Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 19:13:25 -0400 (EDT) > > >> From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> One of the biggest bitmaps is the background bitmap. So you have a > >> client that uploads it to X and then goes away. There's nobody to > >>

3dfx voodoo5 framebuffer patch...

2000-10-09 Thread Aaron Botsis
Attached is a patch to include 3dfx voodoo5 framebuffer support. Looking for comments. Doesn't do much other than check for the voodoo5 device id. It also doesn't do anything voodoo5 specific. (voodoo5 is apparently backward compatible to the voodoo3) But I changed some of the code to make it

kmap_high/flush_tlb_all/smp_call_function problem

2000-10-09 Thread Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
We are running some fairly intensive tests with XFS and with HIGHMEM on an X86 machine with 4G of memory and 4 cpus. The linux-kernel version is test8. The code also contains Stephen Tweedie's highmem-kiobuf. What we see is that after a while of running, smp_call_function getting stuck in the

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:07:32PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > If the oom killer kills a thing like init by mistake > That only happens in the "random" OOM killer 2.2 has ... [OOM killer war] Hi there, before you argue endlessly about the "Right OOM Killer (TM)", I did a small patch to

Re: Tux 2 patents

2000-10-09 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Tim, I forwarded this one to the lawyers. Thanks Jeff Timothy Roscoe wrote: > > For what it's worth, the system was called "Jackdaw" and was written by > Mike Challis. It was in extensive use on the University's MVT/MVS/MVSXA > mainframe for many years as the database for holding user

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Is there a limit? > > I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size. > > That seems reasonable > > > Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel > > before 2.4 for expanded DVD support. > > You should be

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Jim Gettys writes: > >> From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> One of the biggest bitmaps is the background bitmap. So you have a > >> client that uploads it to X and then goes away. There's nobody to > >> un-count to by the time X decides

RE: Updated 2.4 TODO List

2000-10-09 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Hi Ted, Here's an updated USB 2.4 TODO list. The new entries (changes) are marked with '+'. ~Randy USB Status/Problems in 2.4.0-test9 2000-October-09 1. Should [already] Be Fixed . hid joystick handling (patch from Vojtech) (2.4.0.9.4)

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Jim Gettys writes: >> From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> One of the biggest bitmaps is the background bitmap. So you have a >> client that uploads it to X and then goes away. There's nobody to >> un-count to by the time X decides to switch to another background. > > Actually, the big

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Kenn Humborg
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:55:33AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:45:18PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote: > > Simple. Each interrupt stack is, say, 8 pages. You have an array > > of N interrupt stacks. Then you calculate > > > >cpu_id = (sp & ~(INT_STACK_SIZE-1)) >>

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, bert hubert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:38:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > So the process that gave X the bitmap dies. What now? Are we going to > > depend on X un-counting the resources? > > > > I'd prefer just X having a higher "mm nice level" or

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyway, there is/was an API in PTX to say (either from in-kernel or through > > some user machinations) "I Am a System Process". Turns on a bit in the > > proc struct (task struct) that made it exempt

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:45:18PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote: > Simple. Each interrupt stack is, say, 8 pages. You have an array > of N interrupt stacks. Then you calculate > >cpu_id = (sp & ~(INT_STACK_SIZE-1)) >> (PAGE_SHIFT + 3); > > Actually, I'd put the interrupt stack and any other

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> > I dont actually know a CPU that doesnt have one in SMP mode. Its just often > > behind an I/O interface that is slower than ideal > > Where would you put it for IA32 ? I don't know any free MSR that could > be abused for that, and acessing MSRs is insanely slow anyways. Any > other ideas ?

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:44:58 +0200 From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:41:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > I dont actually know a CPU that doesnt have one in SMP mode. Its just often > behind an I/O interface that is slower than ideal Where

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Jens, DVD should always use UDF? This may explain what we are seeing as well. Jeff Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > You should be burning these disks UDF formatted > > > > But the original DVD was an iso9660 image, also where are tools for doing > > UDF?

Re: 2.4.0-test9 [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctls

2000-10-09 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 07:22:38PM +0200, Alain Knaff wrote: > > The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores floppy ioctl functionality, > > which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7. It now tests for fake > > ioctl's,

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Kenn Humborg
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:36:35AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:30:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I think I'll go for the 'current is in a well-known register' > > > approach and see how this goes... > > > > Failing that the 2.0 approach will work, current is a global

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:41:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > The problem is where to get the cpuid from (see how smp_processor_id > > is currently defined ;) When you don't have a hidden register in the > > CPU you're screwed. > > [x86-64 has one btw] > > I dont actually know a CPU that

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > You should be burning these disks UDF formatted > > But the original DVD was an iso9660 image, also where are tools for doing > UDF? Most likely bridged iso9660/udf. But just use UDF -- grab the UDF off the cvs tree, it comes with tools to make UDF

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> The problem is where to get the cpuid from (see how smp_processor_id > is currently defined ;) When you don't have a hidden register in the > CPU you're screwed. > [x86-64 has one btw] I dont actually know a CPU that doesnt have one in SMP mode. Its just often behind an I/O interface that

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:38:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So the process that gave X the bitmap dies. What now? Are we going to > depend on X un-counting the resources? > > I'd prefer just X having a higher "mm nice level" or something. I wonder how many megabytes we can fill with all

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Andre, Here's the info you called about today. The DVD next door is a SCSI (I thought it was an ATAPI device, but it's SCSI). The other burner with the speed=8 problem is the MATSHITA and it is an ATAPI device. Here's the technical info. This is the drive that returned all the packet

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I think I'll go for the 'current is in a well-known register' > > approach and see how this goes... > > Failing that the 2.0 approach will work, current is a global in uniprocessor > and a #define to an array indexed by cpu id in smp You can also still

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:30:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I think I'll go for the 'current is in a well-known register' > > approach and see how this goes... > > Failing that the 2.0 approach will work, current is a global in uniprocessor > and a #define to an array indexed by cpu id in smp

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyway, there is/was an API in PTX to say (either from in-kernel or through > some user machinations) "I Am a System Process". Turns on a bit in the > proc struct (task struct) that made it exempt from death from a variety > of sources, e.g. OOM,

Re: No SCSI burning problem - ZIP reading problem

2000-10-09 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:37:38PM +, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > I'm having some serious problems with parallel port ZIP with latest > 2.4.0-test9 kernel > Oct 9 16:57:23 dual kernel: Detected scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, > channel > Oct 9 16:57:24 dual kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> > You should be burning these disks UDF formatted > > But the original DVD was an iso9660 image, also where are tools for doing > UDF? I dont know where the DVD format building tools are, but the isofs code won't handle > 4Gig. I guess you could rewrite bits of it to do so if you needed the

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> I think I'll go for the 'current is in a well-known register' > approach and see how this goes... Failing that the 2.0 approach will work, current is a global in uniprocessor and a #define to an array indexed by cpu id in smp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

test10-pre1

2000-10-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
Largely VM balancing and OOM things (get rid of the VM livelock that existed in test9), and USB fixes. And a number of random driver fixes (SMP locking on network drivers, what not). Linus - - pre1: - Roger Larsson: ">=" instead of ">" to make the VM not get stuck.

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Is there a limit? > > I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size. > > That seems reasonable > > > Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel > > before 2.4 for expanded DVD support. > > You should be

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Kenn Humborg
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:04:30AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On 9 Oct 2000 11:08:36 -0700, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds) wrote: > >Note that there are alternative approaches. For example, you could make > >the interrupt stack be in the same multi-page as the regular stack, and > >switch

Re: MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> Is there a limit? > I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size. That seems reasonable > Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel > before 2.4 for expanded DVD support. You should be burning these disks UDF formatted - To unsubscribe

MAX iso9660 size?

2000-10-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
Is there a limit? I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size. Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel before 2.4 for expanded DVD support. Cheers, Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[linux-fbdev] Re: Why 2 cli in vga_vesa_blank?

2000-10-09 Thread James Simmons
> > While working on vgacon I noticed their are 2 cli() in vga_vesa_blank > > that are excuted one after another. Is their are a reason for this or > > shoudl it be just one cli()? > > If you look at vgacon.c you still see remains of what the code used to > look like. Now comapare with

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Gerrit . Huizenga
At Sequent, we found that there are a small set of processes which are "critical" to the system's operation in that they should not be killed on swap shortage, memory shortage, etc. This included things like init, potentially inetd, the swapper, page daemon, clusters heartbeat daemon, and

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Jim Gettys
> From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:50:51 -0700 (PDT) > To: Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Rik van Riel

[linux-fbdev] Re: Why 2 cli in vga_vesa_blank?

2000-10-09 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 08:56:29PM -0700, James Simmons wrote: > While working on vgacon I noticed their are 2 cli() in vga_vesa_blank > that are excuted one after another. Is their are a reason for this or > shoudl it be just one cli()? If you look at vgacon.c you still see remains of what

Re: Calling current() from interrupt context

2000-10-09 Thread Keith Owens
On 9 Oct 2000 11:08:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds) wrote: >Note that there are alternative approaches. For example, you could make >the interrupt stack be in the same multi-page as the regular stack, and >switch them both at task-switch time - just allocate four pages instead >of

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Aaron Sethman wrote: > I think the run time should probably be accounted into to this > as well. Basically start knocking off recent processes first, > which are likely to be childless, and start working your way up > in age. I'm almost getting USENET flashbacks ... ;)

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
> > across AF_UNIX sockets so the mechanism is notionally there to provide the > > credentials to X, just not to use them > > The problem is that there is no way to keep track of them afterwards. If you use mmap for your allocator then beancounter will get it right. Every resource knows which

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Aaron Sethman
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, James Sutherland wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > > so dns helper is killed first, then netscape. (my idea might not > > > > make sense though.) > > > > > > It makes some sense, but I don't think OOM is

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Jim Gettys wrote: > > > On Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:38:10 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > > > The problem is that there is no way to keep track of them afterwards. > > > > So the process that gave X the bitmap dies. What now? Are we going

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Jim Gettys
On Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:38:10 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > The problem is that there is no way to keep track of them afterwards. > > So the process that gave X the bitmap dies. What now? Are we going to > depend on X un-counting the resources? > X has to

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > I'd prefer just X having a higher "mm nice level" or something. > > Which it has, because: > > 1) CAP_RAW_IO > 2) p->euid == 0 Oh, I agree, but we might want to generalize this a bit so that root could say "this process is important" and then

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Jim Gettys
> > Sounds like one needs in addition some mechanism for servers to "charge" > clients for > > consumption. X certainly knows on behalf of which connection resources > > are created; the OS could then transfer this back to the appropriate client > > (at least when on machine). > > Definitely -

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > consumption. X certainly knows on behalf of which connection resources > > > are created; the OS could then transfer this back to the appropriate client > > > (at least when on machine). > > > > Definitely -

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > consumption. X certainly knows on behalf of which connection resources > > are created; the OS could then transfer this back to the appropriate client > > (at least when on machine). > > Definitely - and this is present in some non Unix OS's. We do pass

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > Would this complexity /really/ be worth it for the twice-yearly OOM > > situation? > > the only reason i suggested this was the init=/bin/bash, 4MB > RAM, no swap emergency-bootup case. We must not kill init

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Sounds like one needs in addition some mechanism for servers to "charge" clients >for > > consumption. X certainly knows on behalf of which connection resources > > are created; the OS could then transfer this back to the appropriate

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, David Ford wrote: > Not if "init" is a particular program running on a router floppy for > example. The system may be designed to be a router and the userland > monitor/control program is the only thing that runs and consumes 90% of the > memory. If a forked or spawned

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >