Jay Cliburn wrote:
For reasons not yet clear to me, it appears the L1 driver has a bug or
the device itself has trouble with DMA in high memory. This patch,
drafted by Luca Tettamanti, is being explored as a workaround. I'd be
interested to know if it fixes your problem.
Yes, it certainly
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Duane Griffin wrote:
Add custom dentry hash and comparison operations for HFS+ filesystems
that are case-insensitive and/or do automatic unicode decomposition.
The new operations reuse the existing HFS+ ASCII to unicode conversion,
unicode decomposition and case
At Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:36:23 +0200 (CEST),
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
[1 text/plain; ISO-8859-2 (8bit)]
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Takashi Iwai wrote:
[..]
Sound it in not rocket science. In 99.9% cases you need well abstracted
API which ALSA doe not provide and this is real cause why so poor sound
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:39:18PM +0530, vignesh babu wrote:
Replacing (n (n-1)) in the context of power of 2 checks
with is_power_of_2
You might want to run
egrep -R '([a-zA-Z0-9_.]+) * *\(\1 *- *1\)' /usr/src/linux
This does
=
0. cat /etc/slackware-version
Slackware 11.0.0 (x86_64)
=
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:40:23PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 14:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
It was started in time when most cheap sound cards was without hw mixer.
And .. when today you use ALSA on sound card without hw mixer still all
this (past ?) problems are actual.
Hi,
On Monday 25 June 2007, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Takashi Iwai wrote:
[..]
Any plans for doing this ?
Did you count the number of devices that tree supports?
What is harder ? Bring ALSA API to the same level of functionalities as
OSS provides or port (FOSS) ALSA
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the winner is ...
f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit
commit f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL
At Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:47:50 +0200,
Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:40:23PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 14:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
It was started in time when most cheap sound cards was without hw mixer.
And .. when today you use ALSA on sound card
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:41:48PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
What's the purpose of the change?
Chopping small bits of utrace to mainline.
regset stuff looks reasonable and self-contained enough to start with.
However, regset part in utrace contain quite a few unused things, so
I'm leaving
Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote:
Jay Cliburn wrote:
For reasons not yet clear to me, it appears the L1 driver has a bug or
the device itself has trouble with DMA in high memory. This patch,
drafted by Luca Tettamanti, is being explored as a workaround. I'd be
interested to know if it fixes your
Paul Menage wrote:
On 6/22/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with input in bytes is that the user will have to ensure
that the input is
a multiple of page size, which implies that she would need to use the
calculator every time.
Having input in bytes seems pretty
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several
related things:
Looks good. We can get away with exporting a lot less of this to
userspace too, can't we?
Probably. What
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, restoring nmi.c to the v2.6.21 state does not fix the
nmi_watchdog=2 hang. I'll do a bisection run.
and after spending an hour on 15 bisection steps:
git-bisect start
git-bisect good
On Jun 25 2007 14:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
It was started in time when most cheap sound cards was without hw mixer.
And .. when today you use ALSA on sound card without hw mixer still all
this (past ?) problems are actual.
Huh? I have no problems with soft mixing...
Diverging from the
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
I am getting after initial successes some errors:
rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory
and
#ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192 on x86_64...
Missed to mention: the CPU is Pentium-4.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:41:58PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Sunday June 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#define PG_blocks 20 /* Page has block mappings */
+
I've only had a very quick look, but this line looks *very* wrong.
You should be using
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
I am getting after initial successes some errors:
rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory
and
#ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192 on
On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the winner is ...
f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit
commit f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed May
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
So, do you mean the soft-mixing is the biggest issue? That's just a
part of a design issue, and if we want to go to that way, the
impelemtation would be trivial, regardless on ALSA or not. Totally
irrelevant argument regarding
At Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:44:42 +0200,
Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
So, do you mean the soft-mixing is the biggest issue? That's just a
part of a design issue, and if we want to go to that way, the
impelemtation would be trivial,
On 6/25/07, Jay L. T. Cornwall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Cliburn wrote:
For reasons not yet clear to me, it appears the L1 driver has a bug or
the device itself has trouble with DMA in high memory. This patch,
drafted by Luca Tettamanti, is being explored as a workaround. I'd be
On 2007.06.25 08:49:05 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the winner is ...
f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit
commit
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:46:13AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
Rewrite the buffer layer.
Overall, I like the basic concepts, but it is hard to track the locking
rules. Could you please write them up?
I like the way you split out the assoc_buffers from the main fsblock
code, but the list setup is
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several
related things:
1. split linux/elf.h into pieces
This splits linux/elf.h into several pieces:
linux/elf.h - still the common elf header,
2007/6/25, Andrew A. Razdolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
wapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
This is a page alllocation failure, not Oops.
Did you get any problem after getting this message?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
This patch implements sys_fallocate() and adds support on i386, x86_64
and powerpc platforms.
Changelog:
-
Changes from Take3 to Take4:
1) Do not update c/mtime. Let each filesystem update ctime (update of
mtime will not be required for allocation since we touch only
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several
related things:
Looks good. We can get away with exporting a lot less of this to
userspace too, can't we?
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:36:23PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
ALSA still does not provides good soud devices virtualization for more then
one application. Each day I'm using bludy words when I'm try to use skype
which oppens /dev/mixer [...]
Not
This is the patch suggested by Martin Schwidefsky to support
sys_fallocate() on s390(x) platform.
He also suggested a wrapper in glibc to handle this system call on
s390. Posting it here so that we get feedback for this too.
.globl __fallocate
ENTRY(__fallocate)
stm %r6,%r7,28(%r15)
fallocate() on ia64
ia64 fallocate syscall support.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S 2007-06-11
Implement new flags and values for mode argument.
This patch implements the new flags and values for the mode argument
of the fallocate system call. It is based on the discussion between
Andreas Dilger and David Chinner on the man page proposed (by the later)
on fallocate.
Signed-off-by: Amit
Support new values of mode in ext4.
This patch supports new mode values/flags in ext4. With this patch ext4
will be able to support FA_ALLOCATE and FA_RESV_SPACE modes. Supporting
FA_DEALLOCATE and FA_UNRESV_SPACE fallocate modes in ext4 is a work for
future.
Signed-off-by: Amit Arora [EMAIL
--- Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security
module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the
overall security architecture.
Needlessly exported
Vasily Averin wrote:
+static int early_drop(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *orig)
+{
+ unsigned int i, hash, cnt;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ hash = hash_conntrack(orig);
+ cnt = NF_CT_PER_BUCKET;
+
+ for (i = 0;
+ !ret cnt i nf_conntrack_htable_size;
+
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote:
While there's lots of pain involved in developing an LSM
modern development environments (e.g. virtual machines)
have reduced the value of loadable modules for debug purposes.
lguest is pretty good for this. You can boot a kernel in approximately
This patch adds write support to the uninitialized extents that get
created when a preallocation is done using fallocate(). It takes care of
splitting the extents into multiple (upto three) extents and merging the
new split extents with neighbouring ones, if possible.
Changelog:
-
Changes
Hi all,
Any idea, how to proceed with this topic? Do you think that any of the
suggested solutions for documentation / translation of kernel messages
will have a chance to be included in the kernel?
I tried to summarize the outcome of this discussion...
There are two main issues:
* Translate
N O T E:
---
1) Only Patches 4/7 and 7/7 are NEW. Rest of them are _already_ part
of ext4 patch queue git tree hosted by Ted.
2) The above new patches (4/7 and 7/7) are based on the dicussion
between Andreas Dilger and David Chinner on the mode argument,
when later posted a man page
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
ALSA still does not provides good soud devices virtualization for more
then one application. Each day I'm using bludy words when I'm try to use
skype which oppens /dev/mixer after run galeon with flash plugin which
opens /dev/snd/pcm* or when I start GNOME session with
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
So, do you mean the soft-mixing is the biggest issue? That's just a
part of a design issue, and if we want to go to that way, the
impelemtation would be trivial,
On 2007.06.25 08:40:35 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, restoring nmi.c to the v2.6.21 state does not fix the
nmi_watchdog=2 hang. I'll do a bisection run.
and after spending an hour on 15 bisection steps:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:36:23PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
ALSA still does not provides good soud devices virtualization for more then
one application. Each day I'm using bludy words when I'm try to use skype
which oppens /dev/mixer [...]
Not true anymore:
skype 32381 gombasg mem
Hugh Dickins :
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:24:16AM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 07:39:33PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Please forward the original problem report.
Done.
Okay, that seems to
Hi, Roman!
Roman Zippel schrieb:
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several
related things:
Looks good. We can get away with exporting a lot less of
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 22:57 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
Hello Soeren,
[...]
Soeren pointed at some T60, T60p BIOS update and luckily, there is a
easy way
how to extract the microcode update and even convert it into the .txt
format as
microcode update utility
--- Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Casey Schaufler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Just hoping to avoid a change collision. If I have to deal
with this today it's easy, if it doesn't show up anywhere
until 2.6.28 I'm breezing, but if it all hits in two weeks I
have some scrambling
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... I don't agree much with the virtual relay device solution.
I once experimentally implemented an ALSA-OSS virtual kernel driver.
But, it just gives more complexity.
So instead you move the complexity in the library where it is
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 03:00:30AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
That was a given from the start. The spin that there was any chance
whatsoever it could possibly happen was just that. Even if Linus
could possibly consider this, others have made it pretty clear that
this was never an option
This patch implements -fallocate() inode operation in ext4. With this
patch users of ext4 file systems will be able to use fallocate() system
call for persistent preallocation.
Current implementation only supports preallocation for regular files
(directories not supported as of date) with extent
On 06/25/2007 01:36 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Please recall history of (for example) esound.
From esound README:
Esound is an audio mixing server that allows multiple
applications to output sound to the same audio device.
It was started in time when most cheap sound cards was without hw
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
ALSA still does not provides good soud devices virtualization for more then
one application. Each day I'm using bludy words when I'm try to use skype
which oppens /dev/mixer after run galeon with flash plugin which opens
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:41:44PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Sorry but skype does not for me after switching to ALSA (on skype cfg
level). Probably ALSA developers can explain why :
All above on fresh FC6 and 1.3.53 skype.
$ dpkg -l | grep skype
ii skype
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Clemens Koller wrote:
glibc provides its own version, so it doesn't has to be exported at all.
AFAIK the glibc folks want to rely more on the linux kernel headers
in the future and not provide more or less redundant headers anymore...
In this case it's more an ABI
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
And I now rather think that needs to stay, not be replaced by the
VM_BUG_ON Christoph was proposing for 2.6.23 (which earlier I acked).
Christoph responded to my page_mapping patch by looking at arch/arm,
and there finding a kmalloc in
On Monday 25 June 2007, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
The gadgetfs test program from http://www.linux-usb.org/gadget/
depends on it. I assume most other users of gadgetfs needs this header
too.
There's already a patch in the 2.6.23 queue which moves this
to linux/usb/gadgetfs.h and exports it from
Il giorno dom, 24/06/2007 alle 20.37 -0700, Casey Schaufler ha scritto:
--- Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Casey Schaufler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, for planning purposes, when ought I expect to have to start
dealing with this?
What is your specific concern or use
On Jun 25 2007 15:53, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Vasily Averin wrote:
+static int early_drop(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *orig)
+{
+unsigned int i, hash, cnt;
+int ret = 0;
+
+hash = hash_conntrack(orig);
+cnt = NF_CT_PER_BUCKET;
+
+for (i = 0;
+!ret cnt
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:51:38PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
Few dayas ago OSS source code was oppened uder CDDL for Solaris and GLPv2
for Linux:
http://www.opensound.com/press/2007/oss-gpl-cddl.txt
So this source without problems code can be integragrated in Linus tree
and after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is there some hope that at least the Linux kernel interface definition
files and
everything recursively included from these files will be rewritten in
vanilla
ANSI C?
this has been discussed many times and the
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cdrtools ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ offer support for an OS
dependent SCSI transport. Cdrtools cannot be compiled wihout support for
SCSI
transport, so it is impossible to use Sun Studio to compile cdrtools.
Why does this
Quoting Casey Schaufler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
--- Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security
module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the
On Monday, 25 June 2007 12:43, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
static int usermodehelper_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action,
void *ignored)
{
+ long retval;
+
On 6/24/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2007 07:03:39 Kay Sievers wrote:
On 6/24/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2007 08:49:47 Kay Sievers wrote:
On 6/22/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 16:36:37
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:43:32PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
static int usermodehelper_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action,
void *ignored)
{
+ long retval;
Hi Matt,
sorry for not answering your questions in the first place, i hope this
did not mean to make a bad impression
Matt Mackall schrieb:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
Hi Linus,
hi LKML,
i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the
I have not implemented FA_FL_FREE_ENOSPC and FA_ZERO_SPACE flags yet, as
*suggested* by Andreas in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/323 post.
If it is decided that these flags are also needed, I will update this
patch. Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 07:15:00PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this has been discussed many times and the answer is that the kernel is
not gong to change it's side of things to ANSI C.
I don't think that's entirely true with regard to the include files.
We have
--- Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the value is overrated. You would never want to do that
in a production environment, and in a debug environment you could
just as easily reboot and get some start-up testing out of the way.
And in a development environment you can
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:15:33PM +0200, Grozdan Nikolov wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2007 19:53, you wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 14:17 +0200, Grozdan Nikolov wrote:
[...]
Please CC me as I'm not subscribe to this mailing list,
Perhaps you should change that and find most answers for
On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other
comments. With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread
before writing any replies is just not possible.
Perhaps the list needs to be split up, e.g. [EMAIL
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
linux/elf-const.h - ELF constants, includable by asm code
BTW who's the maniac who tries to use this in asm code?
Many of these constants are pretty useless without the corresponding
structure definitions.
bye, Roman
-
To
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 04:59:06AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
Just one kernel version? The problem here is in every
kernel revision after 551c012d7eea3dc5ec063c7ff9c718d39e77634f
2.6.20-rc2,rc3,rc4,rc5,rc6,rc7 ... 2.6.20 ... 2.6.21 ... 2.6.22-rc5
noop:
Timing buffered disk reads: 254 MB
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:38 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The main problems are not really hard to fix..
- Most problems eem to be related to the fact that Linux does not
use C-99 based types in the kernel and the related type
On 06/25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:43:32PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Sadly, you can't use srcu/qrcu because it doesn't handle timeouts.
Interesting... So the thought is to have a synchronize_srcu_timeout()
or something similar that waited for a grace
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:02:01PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
Am I right in thinking you have three unrelated patches here?
I don't think so but you may be right nonetheless if my opinion.
The point is: the way we do development here is to break things down
into a series of simple,
On 06/25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 25 June 2007 12:43, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Second, call_usermodehelper's path should first increment the counter, and
only
then check usermodehelper_disabled,
It does this already.
Ah, sorry, I looked at this patch without seeing the
I assume you typoed and meant cleaned up kernel include files as
installed by make headers_install instead.
I am thinking about kernel include files that do correct preincludes for
type-cleanness and that work if you use them without #defining __KERNEL_
there is no __KERNEL__ in the make
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 17:17 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:38 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
A kernel include file that defines an interface to a user space program
should be self containing (that means that all includes for all
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
there is no __KERNEL__ in the make headers_install'd kernel headers.
not quite technically true, as unifdef isn't smart enough to factor
out __KERNEL__ if it's part of a larger, logical expression involving
the || operator. but that's being
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
A waste to store one? Waste of what? It isn't a waste of space; the
space would otherwise be unused. Waste of an instruction, perhaps.
Yes.
Of course, calling register_kernel_hw_breakpoint() with three extra
arguments is a waste of an
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
I added this on top of your patch to make it compile (and look a little
nicer).
With that, bptest worked nicely.
I'll merge this with the rest of the patch.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:56:36AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+static int bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct device *dev = data;
+
+ printk(bus notify called\n);
+
+ /* We are only intereted in device
On Monday 25 June 2007 09:48:41 Michael Holzheu wrote:
Hi all,
Any idea, how to proceed with this topic? Do you think that any of the
suggested solutions for documentation / translation of kernel messages
will have a chance to be included in the kernel?
Personally? No to the second
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[..]
In my experience OSS is a pile of crap compared to ALSA.
Could you say something more detailed about this compare ?
kloczek
--
---
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je
On 06/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 06/25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:43:32PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Sadly, you can't use srcu/qrcu because it doesn't handle timeouts.
Interesting... So the thought is to have a synchronize_srcu_timeout()
or
On 6/25/07, Johannes Weiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
this is what just hit the ring buffer when I was surfing with elinks on a
brand-new -rc6.
Johannes:
This is a known bogus warning. You can safely ignore it.
David, Ingo:
[ Ok, so we know that XFS wants to lock inodes in ascending
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this has been discussed many times and the answer is that the kernel is
not gong to change it's side of things to ANSI C.
I don't think that's entirely true
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:18:41AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
How do you know 165MB/s is correct?
It is the maximum value I measure. It's also the value that I
measure consistently with NCQ off, like with 2.6.18. Finally,
even before I bought this PC, I did some research and the RAID
with
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
database
Pim Zandbergen wrote
I reported this to GigaByte, and lo and behold, they sent me a fixed
BIOS within 48 hours.
Kudos to Taipeh!
They sent the BIOS image in a private message, so it might take a
while before it's available
on their website.
It is now, and it is described as Fix Vista boot
Impressive.
Jesse, can you touch base with Intel's BIOS department? Also, what are
the chances of that patch making it into 2.6.22-rc6/7 if it hasn't
already?
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Pim Zandbergen wrote
I reported this to GigaByte, and lo and behold, they sent me a
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other
comments. With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread
before writing any replies is just not
On 06/24/2007 04:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 22 June 2007 19:11, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/22/2007 11:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 22 June 2007 00:34, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I myself have argued that we should be focusing
On Jun 25 2007 09:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other
comments. With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
And I now rather think that needs to stay, not be replaced by the
VM_BUG_ON Christoph was proposing for 2.6.23 (which earlier I acked).
Christoph responded to my page_mapping patch by looking at
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so how about the following, different approach: anyone who has a tasklet
in any performance-sensitive codepath, please yell now.
The Siemens Gigaset ISDN base driver uses tasklets in its isochronous
data paths. These will be scheduled for each completion of
On 06/24/2007 11:43 PM, dave young wrote:
Hi,
I reconfig my kernel, boot and oops, EIP in __change_page_attr:166, I
tried 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 and 2.6.22-rc5 , same result.
Anyone has some clues?
here is my config file:
Where are the oops messages?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
In many situations the page struct passed to flush_dcache_page is
simply used to calculate the virtual address. So its mostly harmless.
Trouble starts when page attributes like the mapping is used.
Mostly harmless indeed. I don't understand why
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 00:33 -0400, James Morris wrote:
Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security
module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the
overall security architecture.
Needlessly exported LSM symbols have been unexported, to
501 - 600 of 829 matches
Mail list logo
