Intel 945GM: 2.6.25-rc3 report (with a possible regression)

Hi, this mail is to give feedback about the 2.6.25-rc3 kernel, on an Ubuntu 7.10 system, running on a Toshiba Satellite U305. Video is a Intel 845GM, and I run 915resolution at start to make X happy with the correct widescreen resolution. A lot of data is collected here (if more is needed, tell

Re: ndiswrapper tainting

On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 20:02 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > What are the chances that incorrect tainting of ndiswrapper will be > fixed in 2.6.25? > Please let's not turn it into another empty discussion. > > Seconded. Please. -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it!

Re: [Suspend-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off aftersuspend-to-disk. Screen becomes green.

On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:02 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Feb 21, 2008 1:52 AM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ahh. You're using the BIOS to re-initialize your video, aren't you? > > I don't know. Just pure simple "s2ram" without any options. Well, as far as I know, s2ram could

2.6.25-rc1/2 regression: first-time login into gnome fails

Hi, I have a very strange, but fully reproducible, regression with 2.6.25-rc1 -rc2. I have an ubuntu 7.10 fully updated. The first time after boot, when I login to gnome (through gdm) the login half-fails with a Setting Daemon error: failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-: conne

Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:30 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2008, Len Brown wrote: > > You might check if CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m is set and you can load the "video" > > module. > > While the sony may be non-standard and not load, your thinkpad may work. [...] > > We real

Re: [RFT] Port 0x80 I/O speed

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:31 +0100, Rene Herman wrote: > cc -W -Wall -O2 -o port80 port80.c On a laptop with a CoreDuo T2080/1.73GHz, but running on battery at 800 MHz (on-demand): (0)rukbat:~/tmp% for i in {1..10}; do sudo ./port80 done cycles: out 3575, in 2844 cycles: out 3589, in 2923 cycle

Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"

On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 22:34 -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote:. > >> > > I spoke too soon earlier, ndiswrapper builds and loads against current > > 2.6.24-rc3. Vmware and proprietary VPN software probably do not. Once again > > I don't > > give a damn, but the enterprise distro v

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

(Cc: trimmed a bit). On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: [...] > > A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or > > more, and that's on a fast dual-core machine with 4gigs of memory and > > 7200rpm disk

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

I jump in this discussion hoping to have some more insight on git and to report my experience as a tester. I consider myself as half-literate in this (I am here since 1991, more or less, and I am able to compile a kernel and even hand-apply a patch, although I am in no way a kernel programmer).

Re: 2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 14:52 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Please open new bug entry at bugzilla.kernel.org. > Your .config might be usefull. Done, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 Romano -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación t

2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

Hi, After the ACPI changes between 2.6.24-rc1 and -rc2 I have my logs "spammed" (every 2-3 seconds) by: [ 423.112903] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. [ 423.113020] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode [ 426.078972] ACPI: EC: mi

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:37 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > . > > Pierre, assuming Romano tests this patch successfully, please apply! > Hi, the patch below solves the problem with my SD card. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks! Romano

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd in a row; the ker

missing IBF_1 confirmations?

Hi, latest git (v2.6.24-rc1-748-g2655e2c) spams my logs with a message like: SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.474976] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.475838] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, sw

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > I do really suspect a software bug. > Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Romano BTW: I noticed that if I change EXTRAVERSION, doing a make rebuild almost all the kernel. Is it normal?

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > (first time) > > 000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e > > (fourth time) > > 000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e > >

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > It looks like a hardware problem to me. Maybe one version is more > optimized and puts more stress on the device ? I remember having > had comparable problems in the past with a CF connected to a > home-made IDE adapter on which the +5V wi

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

(Nick re-added to the Cc: list; sorry, I dropped you without noticing) On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:58 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Hi, > > I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is > busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six time

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

Hi, I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a row, and look: (0)rukbat:~/software/toshiba/lk2624-rc1-mmc2% sudo dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1c count=128 | od -h 128+0 records in 128+0 records out 128

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > Did you partition and format this card in the

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen to need it, simply tell me. dd gave no errors. And to double c

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 > > > > Ok, now this is a bit more telling. The filesystem is indeed corrupt > somehow as it references sectors wy outside the device (at roughly > 280 MB). Yes. The problem is, when I firstly mount

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 08:11 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the > internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't > actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the > card, I saw garbage filenames

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 [OOPS removed] > > > > Did any earlier kernels do this? In other words, do you believe that this > > is a bug which we added after 2.6.23 wa

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:28 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Data loss is never fun. I hope you didn't have anything important on the card. > Well. A cousin-in-law marriage, would hav

2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

Hi, I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1 eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far. This morning I put the card in, nothing happened, removed it. When I put i

2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

Hi, sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops. Config, dmesg etc are at: http://www.dea.icai.upcomillas.es/romano/linux/info/2624rc1_6/ [3.475386] Oops: [#1] SMP [3.475602] Process kacpi_notify (pid: 50, ti=c2122000 task=c210c030 task.ti=c2122000)

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

lem for me (at least, after 8 suspend/resume cycles). Thanks. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:33 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Don't call napi_disable if not configured. > And make sure that any misuse of napi_xxx in future fails > with a compile error. Will test as soon as possible (been without internet in the week end). Thanks. As a bonus, I tried more th

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:44 -0400, Joseph Fannin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > Denis V. Lunev wrote a patch for the NetworkManager thing a day or two > ago (which DaveM has queued). > > Since netlink is involved i

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > hm, this lockdep warning caused lockdep to turn itself off - hence we > > wont get to the really interesting warnings. We'll try to come up with a > > solution for this. > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y > CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y > CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y > CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y > > and please post the resulting dmesg output - does lockdep notice any > lockup reason? (your backtrace suggests some mutex stuff so i

2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

Hi, 2.6.23-rc1 fails for me. I have the sensation it is network-related, but I am not sure, so I send this message just to the list. This same failure was present in git-5734-gd85714d, I sent a message to the list but it seems it never arrived. I hope this will pass through. My system is a toshi

[REGRESSION] locks with v2.6.23-5734-gd85714d (suspend- or bio- related?)

Hi, I was testing yesterday release of kernel, and I have had a lot of problem with the new kernel. It boots ok, the first time it suspend/resume ok, and then at the second or third attempt to suspend, the suspend process will not go though (I suspend using s2ram -f -p -m); it will just lo

Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on ToshibaSatellite A40

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:01 +0200, Maciek Rutecki wrote: > Frans Pop pisze: > >> Unexpected, and potentially pretty serious. Something went wrong with > >> ACPI. Can you try to narrow down when it started happening? > > > > rc1 still had all 4 levels. I'll run a bisect between rc1 and rc6. > > I

Toshiba A305 hda-intel (Was: Re: easy alsa patches for the stablekernel?)

On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 01:42 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:59:07 +0200, > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > It's on git.kernel.org, perex/alsa.git tree mm branch. > You can find the information in the download wiki page of > alsa-project.org. &

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel/ lags a bit behind... > It's j

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

Takashi: good news! On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:48 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, > > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just one hand up: I haven

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > > Just one hand up: I haven't tested the patch pointed to by Andrew, will > > do asap, but it seems that contains the changes

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:44 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:16:33 -0700, > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:05:44 +0200 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Roger, could you try git-alsa patch in the latest mm together with > > > model=acer-aspiore

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 08:39 +0200, Patrick Mau wrote: > In addition I totally agree with Satyam's comment above: either > anybody is testing rc's these days, or people simply stopped reporting. > Hi, I had network-related locks with rc5, but refrained to post here because I am using ndi

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > or alternatively we could do what we do for suspend to RAM on other > platforms (PPC and APM) and just not use the freezer. As a data point, I am running with this patch on top of 2.6.21.2 the last 3+ weeks, with an average of 5/6 STR c

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > - The good (?) news. I have made 7 suspend/resume cycle (to ram, I > > haven't tested hibernation) with a 2.6.21.2 with that patch, applied > > m

Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle onIntel chipset

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:07 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Click on "raw"? e.g.: > > summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree > raw (parent: 1ea0975) > > Neare the top. Hmmm...yes, but if you click raw, you ave "500 internal error", and a raw html source (that is, content: header

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

'RTL-8139C' [ 371.247000] input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input9 [ 371.297000] ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] [ 371.359000] input: Sleep Button (CM) as /class/input/input10 [ 371.359000] ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SBTN] [ 371.402000] input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input11

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

verfirewalling, you know...) Romano -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the following disclaimer, it's attached by our otugoing server and I cannot shut it up. -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en l

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 15:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 25 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > Another naive doubt I have is: in 2.6.17.13, with additional patches > > http://zeus2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linu

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 21:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 24 May 2007 07:20, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can you compile those two modules with PCMCIA_DEBUG=4? > > Something like > > make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DPCMCIA_DEBUG=4 > Well, I have to give up for tonight... that make do not works (see the problem explained in other messages, some p

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:12 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > I really cannot see why it makes a difference. > If you use += (and :=) make will resolve EXTRA_CFLAGS when it see it. > Whereas with = make will resolve it only when actually referenced. > > But the way we use EXTRA_CFLAGS it should not

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Occasional lockups on resume is probably a separate issue, and it might > > well be a race, or even just firmware timing bugs. > > Btw, to solve the 60-second timeout problem, do you

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:14:08 +0200 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ntfs is being naughty. > > hm, lots of Makefiles commit the same sin. Sam, is this as busted as > I think it is? Hmmm..

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok. That was probably true even before you added the suspend ordering > > patch. > > Oh, no it apparently wasn't. I missed your other email that said > >"So, I tried to suspend w

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Can you compile those two modules with PCMCIA_DEBUG=4? > > Something like > > make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DPCMCIA_DEBUG=4 > > should do it. You might also enable CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG while you're at > it. And then the extra debugging ou

Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

(Changing subject to something more informative. You are lost, original thread is at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/38 ) On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 14:06 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Romano

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:01 +0200, Antonino Ingargiola wrote: > Hi, > > 2007/5/23, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [cut] > > Uf, I will try to find the time. I am on my way to try to compile > > 2.6.21.2 now. Problem is that a kernel compile "the ubuntu

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > It's not known, no, and yeah, that's scary (and 60 seconds is long enough > that most people would have grown bored and pushed the power button for >

"raw" format of gitweb does not work.

Try: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=kernel/power/main.c;h=b98b80ccf4373d980f080d1e468a5d68244acf36;hp=40d56a31245e96e7e70557faaea98de382286614;hb=52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056fe0786c28d0555;hpb=7b104bcb8e460e45a1aebe3da9b86aacdb4cab12 and then press "ra

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote:

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/38 > > Please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8456 > That seems to resemble the symptoms you d

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 09:19 +0200, Paolo Ornati wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:09:00 +0200 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Will try to reboot with clocksource=acpi_pm, althoughI think that this > > is the one I'm using. > > you ca

2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

Hi, I am trying to upgrade from my ubuntu kernel 2.6.17.3 to 2.6.21.1 and I have quite a bunch of problems with suspend/resume, both to disk and to ram. I have reported the s2ram problem in a separate message (search for a follow-up to the thread with subject "[patch 00/69] -stable review". http:

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

(resent, using gmail) On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 14:25 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > > > > What happened to: > > > > > > "Fix ACPI suspend / device suspend ordering problem" > > > 52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

(changing email. My employer server adds a stupid and malformed disclaimer, so that vger refuses the post. Oh well. I will no trim the quot to my original message so that it's here for anyone). On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Roman

Re: pcmcia ioctl removal

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:54:16PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: > relies on cardmgr anymore. > > > > I remember needing cardmgr few months ago on sa-1100 arm system. I'm > > not sure this is obsolete-enough to kill. > > Why didn't pcmciautils

Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:hang in atomic copy)

, sometime Nigel's) saved the day (yes, it's quite faster to use suspend-to-disk that doing shutdown, reboot, and re-open all the applications). So, please do not dismiss suspend-to-disk as "crap". It has its place under the sun. Romano -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PRO

Re: Linux 2.6.19

e: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-pcmcia/2006-August/003893.html Moreover, I wish to signal it as a candidate for 2.6.19.y line. Thanks, Romano -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the following disclaimer, it's attached by our otugoing server and I

Re: Linux 2.6.19

On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:21 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > You could send me and the kernel mailing list a note about it anyway, of > course. (And perhaps pictures, if your dachshund is involved. Not that > we'd be interested, of course. No. Just so that we'd know to avoid it next > time). :-)

Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:55 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 19 November 2006 19:21, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > In fact that's up to 30 seconds on a modern box, usually less than that. > > > > Right. If the machine boots qui

Re: try acpi -V & acpi -V & acpi -V (was Linux v2.6.13-rc3)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:30:18PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > It happens just sometime, bust repeating acpi -V & acpi -V in fast succession > it gives a 0% reading in few tries. Kernel is vanilla, no patch applied. > Sorry to reply to myself. The kernel is configured

try acpi -V & acpi -V & acpi -V (was Linux v2.6.13-rc3)

58 until charged Thermal 1: ok, 73.0 degrees C AC Adapter 1: on-line It happens just sometime, bust repeating acpi -V & acpi -V in fast succession it gives a 0% reading in few tries. Kernel is vanilla, no patch applied. HTH, Romano -- Romano Giannetti

Re: 2.6.12-rc2 in_atomic() picks up preempt_disable()

alls to __might_sleep() result in a stack trace. > > but you're not allowed to schedule when preempt is disabled! > Could it be related to this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111277325629959&w=2 -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia C

ACPI + preempt + swsusp (S4) still no go in 2.6.12-rc2

init=/bin/bash (with -rc1 kernel), same kind of problems. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin

Re: [ACPI] Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 and suspend2ram (and synaptics)

do not know where to start... Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:17:08AM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > and nothing more. Well, this was done with the double console, so that I > will try again as soon as I have a bit of time with just the serial console > on. Much better now. Configuration, dmesg at boot, etc are

Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:54:33PM +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:50 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > It happens exactly the same on my laptop, sony vaio whose configuration is > > > > http://www.dea.icai.upco.es/romano/linux/v

Re: 2.6.12-rc1 swsusp broken [Was Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:15:26AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:47:29 +0200, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > The bad news is that with 2.6.12-rc1 (no preempt) swsusp fails to go. > > Ok, I see you have an ALPS tou

Re: 2.6.12-rc1 swsusp broken [Was Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:15:26AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:47:29 +0200, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > The bad news is that with 2.6.12-rc1 (no preempt) swsusp fails to go. > > Ok, I see you have an ALPS tou

Re: [ACPI] Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 02:09:00PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote: > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 16:13, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > This is to report an issue with 2.6.11 and ACPI battery/ac. The resume is: > > acpi battery with preemptive kernel do not work, while the same kernel >

2.6.12-rc1 swsusp broken [Was Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel]

51.id4516 Well... what can I do now (apart doing some real work)? I can try to debug why 2.6.11 with preempt fail, or continue on 2.6.12? I am willing to help! Thank you for your help, Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engin

Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > >swsusp is not working for me with 2.6.12rc1. I compiled the kernel > >preempt, I am compiling now without preempt to test it. -mm3 has a > >similar behaviour. > > Tested with no-preempt -rc1-

Re: ALPS touchpad woes with 2.6.12rc1 and rc1-mm3

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:04:06AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:30:42 +0200, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In the kernels 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 my ALPS touchpad is not > > recognized b

Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Hi all, > >swsusp is not working for me with 2.6.12rc1. I compiled the kernel >preempt, I am compiling now without preempt to test it. -mm3 has a >similar behaviour. Tested with no-preempt -rc1-m

ALPS touchpad woes with 2.6.12rc1 and rc1-mm3

ttp://www.dea.icai.upco.es/romano/linux/config-2.6.12-rc1/laptop-config.html Perfectly working similar data is in: http://www.dea.icai.upco.es/romano/linux/config-2.6.11-rg/laptop-config.html Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spai

swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel

low) -> IRQ5 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0e.0 [A] -> GSI 9 (level, low) -> IRQ9 ...and nothing more. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsu

Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1

Sorry to resume an old thread, but... On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:52:39PM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 > During Easter I had time to test a bit more the patch and I found a very bad issue between acpi keys, preempt and suspend. It's

Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1

dvocating pushing the patch http://bugme.osdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=4516&action=view ,please? It fixed a very bad regression in hotkey event from 2.6.9... Thanks! -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416

Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

the same on my laptop, sony vaio whose configuration is http://www.dea.icai.upco.es/romano/linux/vaio-conf/laptop-config.html Next week is Easter holyday here, I will try to connect my Psion casio as serial terminal and see if I can catch something. Romano -- Romano Giann

Re: 2.6.11: suspending laptop makes system randomly unstable

gged/unplugged" seems more or less random delayed. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&

Re: 2.6.11: suspending laptop makes system randomly unstable

n http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [ACPI] Call for help: list of machines with working S3

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:54:38PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Romano Giannetti schrieb: > > > > I tried with my Sony Vaio FX701. No luck. It goes S3 ok, but it will never > > come back (blank screen, HDD led fixed on). > > > > I am wishing to help

Re: [PATCH, new ACPI driver] new sony_acpi driver

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:41:59PM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:14:12PM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 > > Strange indeed. > > First thing to test is to disable sonypi (either rebuild a kernel >

Re: [ACPI] Call for help: list of machines with working S3

ll never come back (blank screen, HDD led fixed on). I am wishing to help, imply tell me what I have to do. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this l

Re: [ACPI] Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

tating that I need to reboot to have the "good old /dev/sda1" which is in the fstab working. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH, new ACPI driver] new sony_acpi driver

op. Probably it's completely unraleted, but if you have time to have a look, it is on bugzilla too: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 Thanks! Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext

Re: [ACPI] Repost: BUG 2.6.11-rc1: ACPI keys events: only "arrive" after 8 of them.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:05:28PM +0100, Karol Kozimor wrote: > Thus wrote Romano Giannetti: > > I'm stymied. If anyone can help me with this, or simply tell me how to > > have more data on this, I will try to obtain all the data I can. > > I'm us

Repost: BUG 2.6.11-rc1: ACPI keys events: only "arrive" after 8 of them.

nfig-2.6.11rc1.txt Thank you in advance, Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1

ixed the > ALPS detection, so the score for this patch is now 3 success reports and 0 > problem reports. I also think the patch should be included before 2.6.11 > final. > You can add another success. Sony Vaio FX701. Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comil

2.6.11-rc1: ACPI keys events: only "arrive" after 8 of them.

nfig-2.6.11rc1.txt Thank you in advance, Romano -- Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: Disturbing news..

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:57:47AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > Now the binary can do much less harm than before, or am I missing something? > > It have no access to real user data, but can use the system library and

  1   2   >