On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 20:23:07 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:58 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> > On 6/5/20 5:59 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > >> Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through
> > >> someone else's tree
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:58 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 6/5/20 5:59 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through
> >> someone else's tree then.
> >
> > Do you know if it's needed to un-break sh4? If so we should push to
Hi Rich!
On 6/5/20 5:59 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through
>> someone else's tree then.
>
> Do you know if it's needed to un-break sh4? If so we should push to
> get whoever has jurisdiction over it to include it; otherwise I'm
>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:47:34PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 6/5/20 5:43 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> Can you include the patch as well?
> >
> > This one is outside arch/sh and I'm not sure it's permissible to go up
> > through my tree. I was also under the impression that only
On 6/5/20 5:43 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Can you include the patch as well?
>
> This one is outside arch/sh and I'm not sure it's permissible to go up
> through my tree. I was also under the impression that only part 1 was
> needed to fix the immediate problem on sh and tha part 2 was for
>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:38:18PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Rich!
>
> On 6/2/20 3:33 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> [PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh=158429470120959=2
> >>
> >> OK.
> >
> > Included in -mm.
>
> I just had a look at your
Hi Rich!
On 6/2/20 3:33 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr
https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh=158429470120959=2
>>
>> OK.
>
> Included in -mm.
I just had a look at your tree and it looks you forgot to merge the second
patch of the series, see:
>
On 6/3/20 9:27 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 6/2/20 3:33 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Hmm, it looks like Andrew Morton just pulled most of these into -mm,
>> apparently independently of me getting them in my for-next a few hours
>> ago, since his versions lack my signed-off-by. That's ok
Hi Rich!
On 6/2/20 3:33 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> Hmm, it looks like Andrew Morton just pulled most of these into -mm,
> apparently independently of me getting them in my for-next a few hours
> ago, since his versions lack my signed-off-by. That's ok though, as
> long as they go up. Some details
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:49:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:33:32 -0400 Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > Hmm, it looks like Andrew Morton just pulled most of these into -mm,
> > apparently independently of me getting them in my for-next a few hours
> > ago, since his versions
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:33:32 -0400 Rich Felker wrote:
> Hmm, it looks like Andrew Morton just pulled most of these into -mm,
> apparently independently of me getting them in my for-next a few hours
> ago, since his versions lack my signed-off-by. That's ok though, as
> long as they go up. Some
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:13:00PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:08:09AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
> > > the purpose of being the canonical
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:13 PM Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:08:09AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > [PATCH next] sh: remove call to memset after dma_alloc_coherent
> > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh=157793031102356=2
>
>
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:08:09AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
> > the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
> > due to policies around pgp
Hi Rich!
On 6/1/20 4:55 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> Yes, I'll try to get my tree ready for next/PR use tomorrow.
Great, really looking forward.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin -
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:03:13AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>
On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
>>> due to
On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:08 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
> > the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
> > due to policies around pgp keys and
On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing
> mine. This is all really silly since there
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:53:38PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing
> mine. This is all
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 07:30:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > It is in active use. Please do not act on such a request. I would be
> > much quicker to ack things that actually need ack if I weren't CC'd on
> > hundreds of
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 06:14:51PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> To follow up, I see that there was a patch series of yours (3/24) I
> missed ack'ing fairly recently. At first glance it looks good.
Well, I need a formal ACK, or even better have the arch maintainer
pick it up, as that is how
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> It is in active use. Please do not act on such a request. I would be
> much quicker to ack things that actually need ack if I weren't CC'd on
> hundreds of random non-arch-specific changes that don't need it, but I
> understand that's
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:32:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello Rich!
>
> On 5/29/20 12:14 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > To follow up, I see that there was a patch series of yours (3/24) I
> > missed ack'ing fairly recently. At first glance it looks good. It
> > happened to arrive
Hello Rich!
On 5/29/20 12:14 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> To follow up, I see that there was a patch series of yours (3/24) I
> missed ack'ing fairly recently. At first glance it looks good. It
> happened to arrive while I was getting over being horribly sick with
> what I thought was covid19. If
On 5/28/20 5:14 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> Aside from that, the open source & open hardware J-core models are
> still active and in development, with the latest release having been
> made this month, and the J32 with MMU nearly complete and pending
> release, contingent mostly on integration and
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:46:00PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > [adding Linus]
> >
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:46:00PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [adding Linus]
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
> > trying to get upstream for a year again, and they would conflict,
On 5/28/20 12:55 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/28/20 7:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> [adding Linus]
>>
>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
>>> trying to get upstream for a
On 5/28/20 7:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [adding Linus]
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
>> trying to get upstream for a year again, and they would conflict,
>> so I could look into
[adding Linus]
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
> trying to get upstream for a year again, and they would conflict,
> so I could look into rebasing them first.
So for years now it has been
Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
trying to get upstream for a year again, and they would conflict,
so I could look into rebasing them first.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:19:47AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The following changes since commit
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
