On Wed 2018-10-17 09:19:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> allowed.
>
> Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
> experien
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 08:21:02AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:31:35AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM Josh Triplett
> > wrote:
> > > it does, however, ensure that the listed cases *are*,
> > > and helps people know that they're
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 02:13 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
>
> Thi
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 08:49:15AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 08:21 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > People in underrepresented and commonly marginalized groups,
> > especially those more commonly overlooked, don't always know if a
> > given group has taken their particula
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 08:21 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> People in underrepresented and commonly marginalized groups,
> especially those more commonly overlooked, don't always know if a
> given group has taken their particular group into account or given
> any thought to it. Explicit inclusion hel
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> One could consider adding something like "discrimination factors such as",
> or maybe "or any other discrimination factors not listed here" to the
> original text. Or a simple "regardless of, for example, ...".
These sound like perfe
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:31:35AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factor
On 10/17/2018 02:13 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
allowed.
This impression is, in fact,
On 10/17/2018 02:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your comments!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM Josh Triplett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
impression th
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your comments!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted fa
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> allowed.
This impression is, in fact, false, as has already been discussed
elsew
Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
allowed.
Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
experience for everyone", period.
Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Condu
Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018, 15:16:12 schrieb Josh Triplett:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:55:04PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 10/07/18 01:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > > impression that discrimination based on
On 07/10/18 11:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> allowed.
>
> Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
> experience for ev
On 10/10/18 15:33, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Josh Triplett :
>>> The words removed by this patch are a political statement.
>>
>> Choosing not to say those words is a political statement.
>
> The situation is not symmetrical. Choosing the protected classes
> in the CoC is a *change* in its implied
Josh Triplett :
> > The words removed by this patch are a political statement.
>
> Choosing not to say those words is a political statement.
The situation is not symmetrical. Choosing the protected classes
in the CoC is a *change* in its implied politics.
It's a change that is, obviously from
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:55:04PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/07/18 01:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
> >
> > Avoid any ambigu
Em Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:55:04PM -0700, Frank Rowand escreveu:
> On 10/07/18 01:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
> >
> > Avoid any amb
On 10/07/18 01:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> allowed.
>
> Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
> experience for ev
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:42:47PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > In any case, this is not the appropriate place for such patches, any
> > more than it's the place for patches to the GPL.
>
> I disagree. We had the GPLv2 or GPLv3 discussion on the kernel mailing
> list. The syscall clarification was d
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:30 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> FTR, I've submitted my patch earlier today, too:
> https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/issues/610
Will be clarified in the (external-to-Linux) FAQ.
Quoting Coraline: "However, any adopting project is free to modif
> In any case, this is not the appropriate place for such patches, any
> more than it's the place for patches to the GPL.
I disagree. We had the GPLv2 or GPLv3 discussion on the kernel mailing
list. The syscall clarification was discussed on the list. The
EXPORT_SYMBOL and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL stuff
> -Original Message-
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Monday, 8 October 2018 17:12:05 EEST tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josh Triplett
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, 7 October 201
Hi Tim,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:12 PM wrote:
> > From: Josh Triplett
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > Prov
Hi Tim,
On Monday, 8 October 2018 17:12:05 EEST tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Josh Triplett
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:5
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Triplett
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Providing an
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 04:35:14AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
Hi Josh,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 1:35 PM Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > >
Hi Josh,
On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > al
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> allowed.
>
> Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-f
Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
allowed.
Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
experience for everyone", period.
Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Condu
32 matches
Mail list logo
