Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()

2016-02-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, February 22, 2016 10:54:46 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote: > > The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 > > ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > > --- > > drivers/cpuf

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()

2016-02-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote: > The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 > ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >

[PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()

2016-02-21 Thread Eric Biggers
The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/c