Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Broke md as module. I guess this is one way to fix it. Linus Torvalds wrote: Last pre-kernel - I'll do the real test9 before I fly off to Germany on Tuesday. Linus --- - pre8: - initialize to zero - put it in the .bss instead - no extended dumb serial driver

Re: aic7xxx problem with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Torben Mathiasen
On Mon, Oct 02 2000, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: :- "Pierfrancesco" == Pierfrancesco Caci [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now I'm going to try the test9-pre7 stuff :-) Tested. It works as a module now. Didn't try to actually _use_ the scanner. What was the problem, then ? The scsi

2.4.0-test9-pre8 -- Build failure when Athlon build is set to use SMP.

2000-10-02 Thread Miles Lane
Note that, yes, I ran make oldconfig and make clean before attempting to build the SMP version of the kernel. gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -fno-strict-aliasing

2.2.18ac14 yamaha debug output removal patch.

2000-10-02 Thread Rob Landley
The new driver works fine on the box here, produces all sorts of debug gorp to the console though. Most of the unnecessary printk's are commented out, these are the three I've been seeing while playing around with mpg123 and some mp3 files... Other than that, it worked for me... Rob ---

Re: Corruption on database

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Markus, Markus Döhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We're currently in the process switching our SAP R/3 systems over to linux. Database is SAPDB (former ADABAS). The size is about 125 GB. For storing RAW DEVSPACES are used (2 x RAID-5, 1 x RAID-1). We have problems with the database under

Re: Getting fullspeed from Speedstep processors.

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
Is it possible to run these intel 'speedstep' processors at full speed? Its up to the SMM mode firmware to manage the processor. THe kernel changes just make our delay loops cope with suprise cpu speed changes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
fyi you can compile with egcs with using "gcc -V`egcs-version`" for mandrake when you have the egcs package installed. If you want mandrake builds to auto detect the compiler and use that one then can you send me a diff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-02 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you want mandrake builds to auto detect the compiler and use that one then can you send me a diff Actually for 7.2 i change our egcs package to add a kgcc script (which call gcc with the egcs compiler) to be compatible with your last changes on 2.2.18,

test9-pre7 still truncate/ext2 corruption/system hang bugs

2000-10-02 Thread Linux Now
I've had reproduceable and repeatable problems with test9 -most of them- that always leave my laptop stuck. Only sysrq-o seems to respond. It seems it is related to the truncate proble that arised in test7 series. When I'm reading my email in an xterm with pine and I expunge a mailbox, if I'm

block_truncate_page bug?

2000-10-02 Thread Ben Fennema
I'm getting calls to end_buffer_io_bad caused by block_truncate_page. The path that is causing it is a update page with no buffers, so create_empty_buffers gets called. (w/ all the buffers io set to end_buffer_io_bad). Since the page is uptodate, the buffer is set to be update and the b_end_io

IDE patches for 2.2.17

2000-10-02 Thread Mike A. Harris
Well, I've applied the IDE patches for 2.2.17, and everything appears to be working with my VIA board much better now. I'm not sure it is totally optimal yet though. My CDROM's are on the second channel, and I don't much care about them. Can I configure it somehow to optimize it for single

Re: Anyone working on multi-threaded core files for 2.4 ?

2000-10-02 Thread James Cownie
Can someone explain why core dumping can't be done in userspace? ... There must be a good reason Unix and Linux don't do this ... but I haven't thought of it yet. Anyone care to enlighten me? The problem, I believe, is that once a process has reached the point where it has been delivered a

reset/reboot with test8 and above

2000-10-02 Thread Norbert Preining
Hello! I know this may not be the right place but I tried in a lot of different places: Following problem: I have a nvidia card, the nvidia drivers 0.9-5 an ALi MoBo (P5A-B). I have test7 running wonderful. When I start X under test8 - test9-pre7 it reboots immediately. Nothing in the

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:16:44AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 07:51:13PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: Hoping for security just by having more PID's is a bit naive. *1* It is strange that people do not really seem to understand the case for a 32-bit pid_t.

Re: block_truncate_page bug?

2000-10-02 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Ben Fennema wrote: I'm getting calls to end_buffer_io_bad caused by block_truncate_page. The path that is causing it is a update page with no buffers, so create_empty_buffers gets called. (w/ all the buffers io set to end_buffer_io_bad). Since the page is uptodate,

Re: serial driver problems?

2000-10-02 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Ben Marsh wrote: I have a Banksia iTra8 8 port internal ISA modem card (UART 16654) for dial up access. To get the modem card to work I was told to replace serial.c and SerialP.h from 2.2.x kernel source (used 2.2.14-12) and compile a kernel. Hum. Tytso has his serial

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
If you read my entire post, rather than just the part that you quoted, you'll see that I argue FOR, not against, a larger pid_t, based on just these grounds; I know that sooner or later, we'll need those extra processes. Well, my 486 won't... S/390 folks run 70,000 sessions active within the

Alan, are you out there?!

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
I'm sorry, this is TOTALLY irrelevant to any discussions on this list, but... Alan, I've sent you a couple of e-mail concerning v2.0.39 lately (sunday and friday if I'm not all wrong), did you receive them? If not, it seems I too got caught by your filtering... /David _

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:27:16 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S/390 folks run 70,000 sessions active within the same 60 second period off one big box. Not on Linux (yet ;)) but its worth bearing in mind. FYI, OS/390 Unix System Services uses a halfword for the maximum number of

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:27:16 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S/390 folks run 70,000 sessions active within the same 60 second period off one big box. Not on Linux (yet ;)) but its worth bearing in mind. FYI, OS/390 Unix System Services uses a halfword for the maximum number

Re: set_current_state() vs current-state

2000-10-02 Thread Manfred
Andrea wrote: In short you need set_current_state(x) when you do something that relies on the ordering like: set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) if (event_happened_meanwhile) break; schedule(); Btw, even if the code is protected with a

[PATCH-2.2.18] compile fix for netdevice.h

2000-10-02 Thread willy tarreau
Hi Alan, with the ethernet frame diverter in 2.2.18, netdevice.h breaks compilation of user space progs because of an include of net/divert.h. The following one-liner patch fixes it. BTW, in the 2.2.18pre14 main Makefile, the "CC = " statement should be replaced with "CC := ". On my box, the

Re: [PATCH] fix for VM test9-pre7

2000-10-02 Thread ehrhardt
Hi, On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:42:47AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: --- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:09:18 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.cMon Oct 2 00:19:41 2000 @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@ static void refill_freelist(int size) { if

Re: Corruption on database

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Rohland
Christoph Rohland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not think that this is Linux kernel related. There was a bug in the SAPDB kernel with raw devices. Actually I have to correct myself :-( I do not know what's happening. The fixed error was _not_ about this problem. We will investigate further

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:32:40AM -0400, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: This would make more sense wouldn't it. I guess it doesn't help to look right before heading off to bed. Please note that my patch still has problems: It doesn't work with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM both =y.

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 11:47:41AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: Thus, "Hoping for security" is meaningless. But "Hoping for more security by having more PID's" is quite reasonable. If I am local user on your system then I can break in using a wraparound. If that takes 2147483647

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:32:40AM -0400, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: This would make more sense wouldn't it. I guess it doesn't help to look right before heading off to bed. Please note that my patch still has problems: It doesn't work with

PATCH 2.4.0.9.8: support for external module building

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linus, The attached patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre8 greatly improves support for maintaining open source modules outside the kernel. This patch changes linux/Makefile to export all important Make settings with each kernel build, so that external modules can then pick up that info and build with

Re: [KBUILD] PATCH 2.4.0.9.8: support for external module building

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:06:08AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linus, The attached patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre8 greatly improves support for maintaining open source modules outside the kernel. This patch changes linux/Makefile to export all important Make settings with each kernel build,

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:01:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Christoph Hellwig sent me a better patch, with Cc: to Linus, so I hope this will be fixed in test9. *nudge* Here's hoping that one of you guys will post the patch, since it's quite useful and I don't see it on lkml

Re: [KBUILD] PATCH 2.4.0.9.8: support for external module building

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Could you change module.mak to use a new-style syntax (obj-foo). We'd like to get rid of the old *_OBJS stuff as soon as possible. (Or let Olaf do it ;). module.mak? That is just the file that contains the build settings. In any case I don't

problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Richard Polton
Hi, I am using 2.4.0-test8 on an i686 laptop. I find that netscape-4.72 keeps locking up. I am not able to kill the process at all (without a reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is running in either). I have been advised that RvR's memory patches will fix this but I

2.4.0-test9-pre8, usb, unresolved symbols

2000-10-02 Thread f5ibh
Hi! While doing modprobe hid or modprobe usb-uhci, I get the following unresolved symbols. Config is P200MMX, 64Mb SDRAM. -- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look -- unusual then possibly you have very old versions) Linux debian-f5ibh 2.4.0-test9 #1 lun oct 2 14:44:11 CEST 2000

Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

2000-10-02 Thread Daniel Phillips
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: Robert Redelmeier writes: Daniel Phillips wrote in part: One thing to keep in mind in all of this is: nobody is testing the reliability of their journalling or any other kind of filesystem just by running it. To test these things you have to

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Last pre-kernel - I'll do the real test9 before I fly off to Germany on Tuesday. - pre8: - quintela: fix the synchronous wait on kmem_cache_shrink(). This should fix the mmap02 lockup.

Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

2000-10-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:33:54PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: The tricky part of the crash simulator would be recovering the resources the filesystem was using and convincing the VFS to let go of the the partition. If you could return the system to a stable state you could do many, many

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Petko Manolov
Richard Polton wrote: Hi, I am using 2.4.0-test8 on an i686 laptop. I find that netscape-4.72 keeps locking up. I am not able to kill the process at all (without a reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is running in either). I have been advised that RvR's memory

Re: Anyone working on multi-threaded core files for 2.4 ?

2000-10-02 Thread James Cownie
Queueing the tcores in the mm_struct could work though. Add a prctl [1] that enables tcore core dumping. When tcore core dumping is enabled every core dump that would dump a mm_struct with reference count 1 does not actually dump it, but just queues a structure (tqueue) with its registers/

hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
Greetings, In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or am I maybe missing something else?) diff -urN

Re: 2.2.18pre14 msdos mounted filesystems now in uppercase?

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
- opts-small_letter = 0; + opts-small_letter = 1; opts-iocharset = NULL; *debug = *fat = 0; then msdos mounts work as they used to but vfat mounts are also affected. I suspect someone didn't consider all the possibilities. In any event, breaking long-standing

Re: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or am I maybe missing something else?) If this change

Re: Anyone working on multi-threaded core files for 2.4 ?

2000-10-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:10:10PM +0100, James Cownie wrote: Queueing the tcores in the mm_struct could work though. Add a prctl [1] that enables tcore core dumping. When tcore core dumping is enabled every core dump that would dump a mm_struct with reference count 1 does not actually

test9-pre8 doesn't compile Reiserfs-3.6.17

2000-10-02 Thread Steven Cole
I just tried out 2.4.0-test9-pre8, and Reiserfs-3.6.17 didn't get compiled during the make. Up through test9-pre7 (pre2, pre5), this has worked smoothly. In all cases, I apply the linux-2.4.0-test8-reiserfs-3.6.17-patch after the test9-preX patch. I initially configured using make xconfig,

makefile bash2 typo (Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13)

2000-10-02 Thread Clayton Weaver
[] Another problem in Makefile. I guess this change between pre 12 and 13 is a typo: CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \ - else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash; \ + else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash2; \ else echo sh; fi

Re: Where to obtain the latest test kernels

2000-10-02 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
i thought they were versus 2.2.17pre20 ? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if

PROBLEM: PPPD CRASH

2000-10-02 Thread Lucien Rocha
[2.] The problem is described in 5., i only got this problem with this new kernel. Before i upgrade i was using kernel 2.2.14cl and ppp runs nice, but i got problems with sound VIA-chipset(like in docs), then, i decided to upgrade, with this kernel(2.2.17) my sound works fine, but ppp

Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

2000-10-02 Thread Daniel Phillips
Andi Kleen wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:33:54PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: The tricky part of the crash simulator would be recovering the resources the filesystem was using and convincing the VFS to let go of the the partition. If you could return the system to a stable state

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 01:34:03AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Last pre-kernel - I'll do the real test9 before I fly off to Germany on Tuesday. - pre8: - quintela: fix the synchronous wait on kmem_cache_shrink(). This should fix

Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13

2000-10-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Where does the idea that the kernel 'needs' a special compiler come from ? I have been under the impression that that is just Mostly from the sad fact that it does. what we were trying to get away from . I am reminded of other os's that required their

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
Warnings on build with v2.4.0test9pre8 (with Rik van Riel's extra fixes): parport_pc.c:2283: warning: `parport_pc_superio_info' defined but not used sg.c: In function `exit_sg': sg.c:1321: warning: implicit declaration of function `sg_proc_cleanup' page_alloc.c: In function `__alloc_pages':

Re: makefile bash2 typo (Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13)

2000-10-02 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:47:54AM -0700, Clayton Weaver wrote: What is the second "fi" for? The first "if". Tim. */ PGP signature

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: Warnings on build with v2.4.0test9pre8 (with Rik van Riel's extra fixes): parport_pc.c:2283: warning: `parport_pc_superio_info' defined but not used .config dependent I think. sg.c: In function `exit_sg': sg.c:1321: warning: implicit

Re: sigtimedwait with a zero timeout

2000-10-02 Thread James Antill
Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are not late. In fact you are the first who have responded to my linux-kernel messages at all. Yes, I am well aware of sigwaitinfo. sigwaitinfo blocks infinitely if there is no queued signals and is the opposite of sigtimedwait with a zero

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:26:20AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: Warnings on build with v2.4.0test9pre8 (with Rik van Riel's extra fixes): parport_pc.c:2283: warning: `parport_pc_superio_info' defined but not used .config dependent I think.

Re: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 09:24:58AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs lurking in the code... This change also broke CMD646 IDE on alpha lx164. CMD646: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 58 CMD646: chipset revision 1 CMD646: chipset

Re: [PATCH] fix for VM test9-pre7

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:42:47AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: --- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:09:18 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c Mon Oct 2 00:19:41 2000 @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@ static void

Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 05:17:46PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Actually there's another compiler (codepro or how is it called), made by SGI(?) for merced, available under gpl, and hving all gcc extensions, including __asm__(). SGI Pro64 - it's IA64 only and uses the gcc frontends. But I doubt

Re: iounmap() - can't always unmap memory I've mappedt

2000-10-02 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:24:43 +0100 (BST) Unfortunately, this mapping is a requirement for our product. I'd hate to have to create my own pte's and do it all manually. If you are doing it at boot time as Id expect then you may need to -

[PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

2000-10-02 Thread willy tarreau
Hi Alan, 2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will see later why (unknown references to

Re: Alan, are you out there?!

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
This should help to analyse the mail-problem, hopefully (again I ask the rest of the kernellist to forgive me for bringing off-topic matters to this list, but I can't seem to be able to communicate with Alan any other way at the moment): Running /var/spool/mqueue/q3/e92Aogi17072 (sequence 1 of

Re: iounmap() - can't always unmap memory I've mappedt

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
Anyway, my original question has not yet been answered: why is it that I can ioremap() any physical page by simply setting one bit, but I cannot always iounmap() it? Why can't iounmap() simply undo what ioremap() did? The fact you can doesn't mean you should. You need to be sole owner of

Re: [PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. loops_per_jiffy*HZ overflows at 2GHz for an int. If the alpha is using ulong for this I guess it works fine at 64bits. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: test9-pre8 doesn't compile Reiserfs-3.6.17

2000-10-02 Thread Claudius Link
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:32:45AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote: I just tried out 2.4.0-test9-pre8, and Reiserfs-3.6.17 didn't get compiled during the make. Up through test9-pre7 (pre2, pre5), this has worked smoothly. With me that was a simple makefile problem linux/fs/Makefile changed

Re: makefile bash2 typo (Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13)

2000-10-02 Thread Andreas Schwab
Tim Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:47:54AM -0700, Clayton Weaver wrote: | | What is the second "fi" for? | | The first "if". Btw, the Bourne language also has `elif': CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \ elif [ -x

PROBLEM: 2.2.17 hangs when attempting to mount atapi cdrom Teac CD-540E

2000-10-02 Thread Serge Gavrilov
[1.] 2.2.17 hangs when attempting to mount atapi cdrom Teac CD-540E [2.] My kernel was compiled with flags CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y My cdrom Teac CD-540E supports UDMA mode2. When I try to mount /cdrom kernel hangs. If I invoke hdparm -d0 /dev/hdc

Re: [PATCH] fix for VM test9-pre7

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Rik, the shm swapping still kills the machine(8GB mem) the machine with somthing like '__alloc_pages failed order 0'. When I do the same stresstest with mmaped file in ext2 the machine runs fine but the processes do not do anything and vmstat/ps lock up on these processes. Greetings

Re: test9-pre8 doesn't compile Reiserfs-3.6.17

2000-10-02 Thread Steven Cole
On 2000-10-02 Claudius Link wrote: With me that was a simple makefile problem linux/fs/Makefile changed quit a bit. So you have to add the line subdir-$(CONFIG_REISERFS_FS)+= reiserfs somewhere (for example after "subdir-$(CONFIG_JFFS_FS) += jffs") then it works fine. Right,

Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

2000-10-02 Thread Andreas Dilger
Albert Cahalan write: Robert Redelmeier writes: Daniel Phillips wrote in part: One thing to keep in mind in all of this is: nobody is testing the reliability of their journalling or any other kind of filesystem just by running it. To test these things you have to crash/interrupt the

buffer_head.b_blocknr is unsigned long, not int

2000-10-02 Thread Matt_Domsch
Throughout linux/fs/buffer.c, the struct buffer_head member b_blocknr has integer values put into it, while it's defined to be an unsigned long in fs.h. For architectures where sizeof(int) != sizeof(long), calls to bread() could potentially do the wrong thing if the disk has more than 2^41

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Petko Manolov wrote: Richard Polton wrote: I am using 2.4.0-test8 on an i686 laptop. I find that netscape-4.72 keeps locking up. I am not able to kill the process at all (without a reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is running in either). I

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.17 hangs when attempting to mount atapi cdrom Teac CD-540E

2000-10-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Oct 02 2000, Serge Gavrilov wrote: [1.] 2.2.17 hangs when attempting to mount atapi cdrom Teac CD-540E [2.] My kernel was compiled with flags CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y My cdrom Teac CD-540E supports UDMA mode2. When I try to mount

Re: test9-pre7 doesn't recognize HiSax ISDN card

2000-10-02 Thread Karsten Keil
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:08:10AM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: The subject tells everything: ... 28x481 23:49:14 penny kernel: fb0: MATROX VGA frame buffer device Oct 1 23:49:14 penny kernel: pty: 512 Unix98 ptys configured Oct 1 23:49:14 penny kernel: ISDN subsystem Rev:

Re: Meaning of blk_size

2000-10-02 Thread Daniel Phillips
Andries Brouwer wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 02:33:20AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote: [you sounded as if you noticed a discrepancy somewhere - so I expected: foo.c uses this in line 123 but bar.c uses that in line 666.] No, I'm just

Re: iounmap() - can't always unmap memory I've mappedt

2000-10-02 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:18:59 +0100 (BST) Anyway, my original question has not yet been answered: why is it that I can ioremap() any physical page by simply setting one bit, but I cannot always iounmap() it? Why can't iounmap() simply

Re: [PATCH] fix for VM test9-pre7

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On 2 Oct 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: the shm swapping still kills the machine(8GB mem) the machine with somthing like '__alloc_pages failed order 0'. When I do the same stresstest with mmaped file in ext2 the machine runs fine but the processes do not do anything and vmstat/ps lock up

2.4.0-test9-pre8 on SPARC build failure

2000-10-02 Thread Horst von Brand
This PCI stuff was discussed before... pcic.c: At top level: pcic.c:39: redefinition of `pcibios_present' /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test/include/linux/pci.h:562: `pcibios_present' previously defined here make[1]: *** [pcic.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory

TODO list for new VM (oct 2000)

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
[MM TODO list, updated for october 2000] --- Here is the TODO list for the new VM. The only thing really needed for 2.4 is the OOM handler and a fix for the highmem deadlock. The page-mapping-flush() callback is really wanted by the journaling filesystem folks. The rest are mostly extra's that

Re: TODO list for new VM (oct 2000)

2000-10-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
Why do you apparently ignore the fact that page-out write-back performance is horribly crappy because it always starts out doing synchronous writes? I pointed out previously in a private email that page_launder() must be buggy as it stands now, you seem to have ignored that part (and the

Re: TODO list for new VM (oct 2000)

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Why do you apparently ignore the fact that page-out write-back performance is horribly crappy because it always starts out doing synchronous writes? Because it is fixed in the patch I mailed yesterday? regards, Rik -- "What you're running that

Re: Oops at bootup with 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread really [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--test9-pre8 blows up at boot, somewhere around the ALI5X3 init. Here's the oops, with ksymoops decode. Copied by hand, hope it's correct: Darn. Made 3 typos in transcription: ALI5X3: IDE controller on PCI buss 00 dev 78 ^ Process swapper (pid: 2,

Re: TODO list for new VM (oct 2000)

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Why do you apparently ignore the fact that page-out write-back performance is horribly crappy because it always starts out doing synchronous writes? Because it is fixed in the patch I mailed yesterday?

Re: PIDs limited to 15 significant bits

2000-10-02 Thread Adam Sampson
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 10:48:41PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: I see you don't remember the original post. It argued in favor of a large PID space "because the output of ps wouldn't look nice otherwise"!!! (the poster wanted output sorted by start time without using --sort=start to ask

Linux 2.2.18pre15

2000-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
Bug squash number three. ARM, Alpha and x86 should be completely sorted for the loops_per_sec change. S/390 merge yet to be done. PPC and Sparc still won't build. Alan Stuff left to do for 2.2.18final - loops_per_jiffy for non x86, Alpha, ARM - Merge the S/390 stuff and make

Re: PROBLEM: PPPD CRASH

2000-10-02 Thread Clifford Kite
Please don't post attachments except for unique documents such as program sources. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Lucien Rocha wrote: |[2.] The problem is described in 5., i only got this problem with this |new kernel. Before i upgrade i was using kernel 2.2.14cl and ppp runs |nice, but i got problems

Re: Meaning of blk_size

2000-10-02 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote: These days I have as background activity the construction of the corresponding patch for 2.4. Maybe we can start 2.5 without these arrays and with large device numbers. I started something like this a few months ago, I was at the point to boot

Linux 2.4 kernel wiki for October

2000-10-02 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy
The October 2000 Kernel Wiki Challenge is ... "The most misunderstood part about in Linux 2.4 is " 1) Fill in the blanks, short and sweet, in your own words. 2) Go to http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net/wiki/?KernelWiki find the appropriate subsection of the Wiki covering your area

Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.8: Fix IDE...

2000-10-02 Thread really [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My previous patch was a fix, but (brown paper bag time) standard IDE devices no longer called chipset init. People either had no IDE, or were stuck in legacy mode. This fixes it. This fixes the bootup oops with 2.4.0-test9-pre8 i reported on lkml an hour or 2 ago. b [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] fs/Makefile error in test9pre8 (dquot.o left behind)

2000-10-02 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. When I compile a test9pre8 kernel with quota support I get a lot of link errors regarding quota stuff. The patch below fixes this by correcting what seems to be a mailer/mime error: --- linux-240test9-pre8-clean/fs/Makefile Mon Oct 2 21:07:54 2000 +++ linux/fs/Makefile Mon Oct 2

Re: SA_INTERRUPT

2000-10-02 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Comments? When that is done, please don't call __sti() directly and use some macro that can be overridden by the architectures. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: sigtimedwait with a zero timeout

2000-10-02 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
James Antill wrote: If you want to return imediatley (and there might not be data) the answer given is usually... sigqueue( ... ); sigwaitinfo( ... ); If the above will still schedule, then Linus might be more likely to take a patch (I'd guess that he'd look at sigtimedwait() to be

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread TimO
Rik van Riel wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Petko Manolov wrote: Richard Polton wrote: I am using 2.4.0-test8 on an i686 laptop. I find that netscape-4.72 keeps locking up. I am not able to kill the process at all (without a reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is

Inter-device-driver communication?

2000-10-02 Thread Timur Tabi
Could someone tell me what is the preferred method of having two drivers communicate with each other? I know a driver can send an ioctl to another driver, but since both drivers exist in kernel space, and the kernel is monolithic, I figured that direct calls from one driver to another is not

Re: SA_INTERRUPT

2000-10-02 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 09:45:36PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: When that is done, please don't call __sti() directly and use some macro that can be overridden by the architectures. What do you have in mind while making this suggestion? The irq highlevel layer is pretty much architectural

2.2.17 3Com bug

2000-10-02 Thread hdcool
Hello, I ran RedHat 6.2 and tried all sorts of kernels.. no problem at all. I ran kernel 2.2.17 and everytime MS-Windows has booted(I run a dual-boot sys) my networkcard (eth0=dhcp=3c59x.o) doesn't want to connect to the internet. First I thought this was my isp his fault or my redhat was

Re: Inter-device-driver communication?

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote: Could someone tell me what is the preferred method of having two drivers communicate with each other? I know a driver can send an ioctl to another driver, but since both drivers exist in kernel space, and the kernel is monolithic, I figured that direct

Re: Inter-device-driver communication?

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote: ** Reply to message from Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] on For driver-driver communication, it is totally dependent on what you need to communicate. It could be something as simple as a small, shared module protected by a spinlock, or something more

Re: [PATCH-2.2] Bonding Driver Enhancements + Security fix

2000-10-02 Thread Thomas Davis
Willy TARREAU wrote: Hello Thomas ! I've slightly enhanced the bonding code : - MII link checking with automatic slave enabling/disabling : Now the bond interface monitors all its MII-compliant slaves and disables the ones which have a dead link, and enables those which

Re: Login prompt auto-regen

2000-10-02 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 13:35:47 -0600 From: Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Login prompt auto-regen Alan, Your mail server is getting errors at address [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I am

Re: Login prompt auto-regen

2000-10-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Thanks Jeff "Mike A. Harris" wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 13:35:47 -0600 From: Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Login prompt auto-regen Alan, Your mail server

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:26:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:01:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Christoph Hellwig sent me a better patch, with Cc: to Linus, so I hope this will be fixed in test9. *nudge* Here's hoping that one of you guys will post the

  1   2   3   4   >