On 2023/10/9 22:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 18:58:27 +0800
Yajun Deng wrote:
C compiler decides to inline or not, depending on various factors.
The most efficient (and small) code is generated by this_cpu_inc()
version, allowing the compiler to inline it.
If you
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 20:42 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 19:23:04 -0500, Sean Christopherson
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC
> > > >
> > > Later the hosting process could migrated/reassigned to another cgroup?
> > > What to do when the new cgroup is OOM?
> > >
> >
> > You addressed in the documentation, no?
> >
> > +Migration
> > +-
> > +
> > +Once an EPC page is charged to a cgroup (during allocation), it
Hi Sean
On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 19:23:04 -0500, Sean Christopherson
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Kai Huang wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> +/**
> + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC out-of-memory handling on target LRU
> + * @lru: LRU that is low
> + *
> + *
On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:18:00 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 20:04 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 18:45:06 -0500, Huang, Kai
wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson
> >
> > Introduce the OOM path for
On Tue, 2023-10-10 at 00:50 +, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 17:23 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC out-of-memory handling on
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 20:04 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 18:45:06 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > From: Sean Christopherson
> > >
> > > Introduce the OOM path for killing an enclave with a reclaimer that is
> > >
On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 18:45:06 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson
Introduce the OOM path for killing an enclave with a reclaimer that is
no
longer able to reclaim enough EPC pages. Find a victim enclave, which
will be
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 17:23 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC out-of-memory handling on target LRU
> > > + * @lru: LRU that is low
> > > + *
> > > + *
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:18:59 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully
> merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead
> code paths.
>
> Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl()
>
> @@ -332,6 +336,7 @@ void sgx_isolate_epc_pages(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lru,
> size_t nr_to_scan,
> * sgx_reclaim_epc_pages() - Reclaim EPC pages from the consumers
> * @nr_to_scan: Number of EPC pages to scan for reclaim
> * @ignore_age: Reclaim a page even
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC out-of-memory handling on target LRU
> > + * @lru: LRU that is low
> > + *
> > + * Return: %true if a victim was found and kicked.
> > + */
> > +bool
> +static inline struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *epc_cg_lru(struct sgx_epc_cgroup
> *epc_cg)
> +{
> + if (epc_cg)
> + return _cg->lru;
> + return NULL;
> +}
>
It's legal to return NULL EPC cgroup for a given EPC page, i.e., when the
enclave isn't assigned to any cgroup. But ...
> +/**
> + * sgx_epc_cgroup_lru_empty() - check if a cgroup tree has no pages on its
> lrus
> + * @root:root of the tree to check
> + *
> + * Return: %true if all cgroups under the specified root have empty LRU
> lists.
> + * Used to avoid livelocks due to a cgroup having a non-zero charge
Hello RT-list!
I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.197-rt96 stable release.
This release is just an update to the new stable 5.10.197 version
and no RT-specific changes have been performed.
You can get this release via the git tree at:
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> Introduce the OOM path for killing an enclave with a reclaimer that is no
> longer able to reclaim enough EPC pages. Find a victim enclave, which
> will be an enclave with only "unreclaimable" EPC pages left
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 18:49:43 +0200
Rodolfo Zitellini wrote:
> Hi!
> I’ve been working on a new LocalTalk interface driver for the last couple
> months, do you think it would be possible to at least postpone the removal of
> LT a bit?
>
> It is a driver for an open source device called TashTalk
Hello RT-list!
I'm pleased to announce the 4.14.326-rt155 stable release.
This release is an update to the new stable 4.14.326-rt155
version and no RT-specific changes have been performed.
You can get this release via the git tree at:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:33:53 -0700 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > We do have sympathy for these folks, we are mostly volunteers after
> > all. At the same time someone's under-investment should not be causing
> > pain to those of us who _do_ build test stuff carefully.
>
> This is a bit over the
On 10/7/23 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
From: Joe Mason
Add a device tree for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (curtana) phone, based on
sm7125-xiaomi-common.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Joe Mason
Signed-off-by: David Wronek
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile| 1 +
On 10/7/23 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
Enable the UFS found on the SM7125 Xiaomi smartphones.
Signed-off-by: David Wronek
---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio
Konrad
Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
include the correct headers.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10
On 10/7/23 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
Add the UFS and QMP PHY nodes for the Qualcomm SC7180 SoC.
Signed-off-by: David Wronek
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 70
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:43:43 -0700 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On a related topic, this is comically stale as WERROR is on by default for
> > both
> > allmodconfig and allyesconfig, which work because
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:43:43 -0700 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Setting WERROR for random subsystems make life really hard
> > for subsystems which want to build-test their stuff with W=1.
> > WERROR for the entire kernel now exists and can be used
>
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:04 PM Wilczynski, Michal
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/9/2023 2:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:40 AM Wilczynski, Michal
> > wrote:
> >>
[cut]
> >> Yeah we could add platform device without removing acpi device, and
> >> yes that would introduce
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Setting WERROR for random subsystems make life really hard
> for subsystems which want to build-test their stuff with W=1.
> WERROR for the entire kernel now exists and can be used
> instead. W=1 people probably know how to deal with the global
> W=1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:49, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann
>>
>> The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully
>> merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead
>> code paths.
>>
>> Notably, this removes one of the two callers of
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:54:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Setting WERROR for random subsystems make life really hard
> for subsystems which want to build-test their stuff with W=1.
> WERROR for the entire kernel now exists and can be used
> instead. W=1 people probably know how to deal
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully
> merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead
> code paths.
>
> Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl()
> callback that was abused for
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:42:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Now that vdso_install does not depend on any in-tree build artifact,
> it no longer invokes a compiler, making no-compiler-targets the same
> as no-sync-config-targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
> ---
>
> Makefile | 13
У чт, 2023-07-20 у 17:30 +0100, Valentin Schneider пише:
> objtool now warns about it:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exc_page_fault+0x2a: Non __ro_after_init
> static key "kvm_async_pf_enabled" in .noinstr section
>
> The key can only be enabled (and not disabled) in the __init function
>
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:37:14 +0800
Jinyu Tang wrote:
> When we want to know what happened in kernel when our app
> has more latency than we hope, but the larger latency of
> our app may be lower than other process in the syetem.
> We feel sad after waiting a long time but only get other
>
On Monday 2023-10-09 17:14, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>Let me add more context to my question.
>
>I am interested in the timing when
>'pkg-config --print-variables kmod | grep module_directory'
>is executed.
>
>1. Build a SRPM on machine A
>2. Copy the SRPM from machine A to machine B
>3. Run
When we want to know what happened in kernel when our app
has more latency than we hope, but the larger latency of
our app may be lower than other process in the syetem.
We feel sad after waiting a long time but only get other
process sched_wakeup trace.
This Patch can let us only trace target
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:19:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The ndo_do_ioctl function has no actual callers, and doesn't do much here,
> so just remove it entirely as preparation for removing the callback pointer
> from net_device_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:19:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, and can just be removed,
> especially since this is a staging driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/dot11d.c |
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, so the three implementation here
> is useless but only works as a way to identify the device in the notifiers,
> which can really be removed as well.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, and can just be removed,
> especially since this is a staging driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c|
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 8:42 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> You cannot run this code because arch/csky/Makefile does not define the
> vdso_install target.
>
> It appears that this code was blindly copied from another architecture.
Yes, I do that. Thx for pointing it out.
Acked-by: Guo Ren
>
>
On 07.10.23 00:01, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 14:52 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 05.10.23 20:31, Vishal Verma wrote:
<..>
@@ -2167,47 +2221,28 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
if (rc)
return rc;
+
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:07 PM Michal Suchánek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:34:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:31:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On 07.10.23 10:55, Huang, Ying wrote:
Vishal Verma writes:
The MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY flag for hotplugged memory is restricted to
'memblock_size' chunks of memory being added. Adding a larger span of
memory precludes memmap_on_memory semantics.
For users of hotplug such as kmem, large amounts
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:51:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
> Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > > Fixes typo in a function
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 18:58:27 +0800
Yajun Deng wrote:
> > C compiler decides to inline or not, depending on various factors.
> >
> > The most efficient (and small) code is generated by this_cpu_inc()
> > version, allowing the compiler to inline it.
> >
> > If you copy/paste this_cpu_inc() twenty
From: Arnd Bergmann
All of the references to the callback pointer are gone, so remove the
pointer itself before we grow new references to it.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst | 8
include/linux/netdevice.h | 7 ---
2 files
From: Arnd Bergmann
This function has no callers, and for the past 20 years, the request_firmware
interface has been in place instead of the custom firmware loader.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c | 72 --
1 file changed, 72
From: Arnd Bergmann
The ioctl handler has no actual callers in the kernel and is useless.
All the functionality should be reachable through the regualar interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap.h | 1 -
From: Arnd Bergmann
The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, so the three implementation here
is useless but only works as a way to identify the device in the notifiers,
which can really be removed as well.
Looking through the exported functions, I found a bunch more that have
no callers,
From: Arnd Bergmann
The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, and can just be removed,
especially since this is a staging driver.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c| 1 -
drivers/staging/rtl8712/osdep_intf.h | 2 -
From: Arnd Bergmann
The .ndo_do_ioctl functions are never called, and can just be removed,
especially since this is a staging driver.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/dot11d.c | 41 --
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/dot11d.h | 2 -
From: Arnd Bergmann
The ndo_do_ioctl function has no actual callers, and doesn't do much here,
so just remove it entirely as preparation for removing the callback pointer
from net_device_ops.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c | 21 -
1
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:40:53 +0800
wuqiang wrote:
> On 2023/9/23 17:48, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > Hi Wuqiang,
> >
> > Sorry for replying later.
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:52:51 +0800
> > "wuqiang.matt" wrote:
> >
> >> The object pool is a scalable implementaion of high
From: Arnd Bergmann
The old .ndo_do_ioctl() callback is never called any more, instead the
driver should set .ndo_eth_ioctl() for the phy operations.
Fixes: fd3040b9394c5 ("net: ethernet: Add driver for Sunplus SP7021")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
From: Arnd Bergmann
The ieee802154 socket implementation is the last remaining caller of the
netdevice ioctl callback. In order to completely remove this, add a custom
pointer to the existing wpan_dev specific operations structure. Since that
structure is currently only used to wrap the 'create'
From: Arnd Bergmann
The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully
merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead
code paths.
Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl()
callback that was abused for getting device
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023, at 20:52, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:00:30 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> The COPS Appletalk support is very old, never said to actually work
>> properly, and the firmware code for the devices are under a very suspect
>> license. Remove it all to clear
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:34:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:31:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
wuqiang wrote:
> Hello Masami,
>
> Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed. ages[] is
> introduced the way like 2-phase commit to keep consitency and must be kept.
>
> Thinking of the following 2 cases that two cpu nodes are operating
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant
> > > ---
> > >
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 19:44:45 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -118,6 +72,7 @@ static struct dentry *create_file(const char *name,
> > umode_t mode,
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!S_ISREG(mode)))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent);
>
> Nit: This
Hello Kris,
Thank you for your contribution and for having your thought shared with me.
Allow me to begin this conversation by explaining what came to mind when
I decided to propose a patch that creates aliases.
The objective was to address a specific problem I was facing while
minimizing any
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "masahiroy"
> An: "linux-kbuild"
> CC: "linux-kernel" , "linux-arm-kernel"
> ,
> linux-c...@vger.kernel.org, "linux-parisc" ,
> linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org,
> linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, "linux-um" ,
> "loongarch" ,
> "sparclinux" , "x86" ,
>
On 10/9/2023 2:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:40 AM Wilczynski, Michal
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> Thanks a lot for a review, to both of you ! :-)
>>
>> On 10/7/2023 12:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 12:41 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Now that vdso_install does not depend on any in-tree build artifact,
it no longer invokes a compiler, making no-compiler-targets the same
as no-sync-config-targets.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
Makefile | 13 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git
Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:
1. Code duplication
Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.
Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
'make ARCH=parisc vdso_install' has never worked. It attempts to
descend into arch/parisc/kernel/vdso/, which does not exist.
The command just fails:
scripts/Makefile.build:41: arch/parisc/kernel/vdso/Makefile: No such file or
directory
The second line is also meaningless because parisc does
You cannot run this code because arch/um/Makefile does not define the
vdso_install target.
It appears that this code was blindly copied from another architecture.
Remove the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/x86/um/vdso/Makefile | 12
1 file changed, 12
You cannot run this code because arch/csky/Makefile does not define the
vdso_install target.
It appears that this code was blindly copied from another architecture.
Remove the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/csky/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 10 --
1 file changed, 10
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM Michal Suchánek wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:31:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > >
> > > The default MODLIB value is composed of two variables and the hardcoded
> > > string
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:40 AM Wilczynski, Michal
wrote:
>
>
> Hi !
>
> Thanks a lot for a review, to both of you ! :-)
>
> On 10/7/2023 12:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 12:41 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 9:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
> >>
On 2023/10/9 18:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:43 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9 17:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9 16:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:43 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/10/9 17:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2023/10/9 16:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet
On 2023/10/9 17:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9 16:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
'this_cpu_read
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/10/9 16:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> >>>
> 'this_cpu_read +
Hello Masami,
Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed. ages[] is
introduced the way like 2-phase commit to keep consitency and must be kept.
Thinking of the following 2 cases that two cpu nodes are operating the same
objpool_slot simultaneously:
Case 1:
NODE 1:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:31:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > The default MODLIB value is composed of two variables and the hardcoded
> > string '/lib/modules/'.
> >
> > MODLIB =
On 07/10/2023 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
> Document the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (curtana) smartphone, which is based
> on the Qualcomm SM7125 SoC.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 07/10/2023 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
> Document the QMP UFS PHY compatible for SC7180
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wronek
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git
>
On 07/10/2023 15:58, David Wronek wrote:
> Document the compatible for the UFS found on SC7180.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wronek
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi !
Thanks a lot for a review, to both of you ! :-)
On 10/7/2023 12:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 12:41 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 9:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 09:47:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On 2023/10/9 16:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
'this_cpu_read + this_cpu_write' and 'pr_info + this_cpu_inc' will make
the trace work well.
They all have
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> The default MODLIB value is composed of two variables and the hardcoded
> string '/lib/modules/'.
>
> MODLIB = $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)/lib/modules/$(KERNELRELEASE)
>
> Defining this middle part as a variable was rejected on the basis that
>
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:14 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> >
> >> 'this_cpu_read + this_cpu_write' and 'pr_info + this_cpu_inc' will make
> >> the trace work well.
> >>
> >> They all have 'pop'
On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
'this_cpu_read + this_cpu_write' and 'pr_info + this_cpu_inc' will make
the trace work well.
They all have 'pop' instructions in them. This may be the key to making
the trace work well.
Hi all,
I
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng wrote:
> 'this_cpu_read + this_cpu_write' and 'pr_info + this_cpu_inc' will make
> the trace work well.
>
> They all have 'pop' instructions in them. This may be the key to making
> the trace work well.
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need your help on percpu and
86 matches
Mail list logo
