Re: [ACPI] [2.6.12-rc2][suspend] Suspending Thinkpad: drive bay light in S3 mode stays on

2005-04-11 Thread Shawn Starr
was designed to do all of this so why shouldn't the driver do S3 suspend if it hooks into it already? Shawn. --- Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 16:03 -0400, Shawn Starr wrote: I notice in Linux and in XP the drive bay light remains on while the laptop is in suspend

Re: Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop)

2005-04-11 Thread Shawn Starr
looses the functionality until then. I'm thinking 2 years but some say thats too long :) Now that I look at it, I don't need to put it into a CONFIG option as its already a module :-) even better. Shawn. On April 11, 2005 20:09, Rob Landley wrote: On Wednesday 06 April 2005 05:22 pm, Shawn Starr

RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Shawn Starr
Shouldn't IPMI be using /sys instead /proc? I thought we're trying to cleanup /proc? --- List: linux-kernel Subject:RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module From: Date: 2005-04-08 15:53:54 Message-ID: [Download message RAW] The message

RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Shawn Starr
Shouldn't IPMI be using /sys instead /proc? I thought we're trying to cleanup /proc? --- List: linux-kernel Subject:RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module From: Chris_Poblete () Dell ! com Date: 2005-04-08 15:53:54 Message-ID:

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Shawn Starr
Yeah, I can do that, I don't need angry programmers chasing after me :-) Shawn. --- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG > option marked as Deprecated? :) > > Actually it should probably go through > >

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Shawn Starr
Yeah, I can do that, I don't need angry programmers chasing after me :-) Shawn. --- Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Actually it should probably go through

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Shawn. > > > Do you know if /proc/acpi/sleep will be deprecated in > > favour of /sys/power/state? If so, this thread will be > > moot ;) > > No idea, deprecating it would be ok with me. > >Pavel

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I'm working o --- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > I've noticed something strange with issuing > 'standby' to the system: > > > > when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state, > nothing happens, not even a log or > > system activity to attempt standby mode. > > > > However,

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I'm working o --- Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing standby to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo 1 to

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Shawn. Do you know if /proc/acpi/sleep will be deprecated in favour of /sys/power/state? If so, this thread will be moot ;) No idea, deprecating it would be ok with me. Pavel pgpGfWAs0n7J0.pgp

[2.6.12-rc1] suspend to Disk success - T42 laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello Pavel, I can now suspend to disk on the laptop with 2.6.12-rc1. There is no failures anymore. It resumes perfectly. Thank you. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello, I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo "1" to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) and aborts:

[2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello, I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing standby to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo 1 to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) and aborts:

[2.6.12-rc1] suspend to Disk success - T42 laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello Pavel, I can now suspend to disk on the laptop with 2.6.12-rc1. There is no failures anymore. It resumes perfectly. Thank you. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[2.6.11.5][BUILD] i2c.h breakage in 2.6.12-rc1 + -mm only

2005-03-23 Thread Shawn Starr
include/linux/i2c.h:58: error: array type has incomplete element type include/linux/i2c.h:197: error: array type has incomplete element type /usr/local/src/sources/r300_driver/drm/linux-core/radeon_drv.h:274: confused by earlier errors, bailing out I see further back you fed the gcc 4.0 compile

[2.6.11.5][BUILD] i2c.h breakage in 2.6.12-rc1 + -mm only

2005-03-23 Thread Shawn Starr
include/linux/i2c.h:58: error: array type has incomplete element type include/linux/i2c.h:197: error: array type has incomplete element type /usr/local/src/sources/r300_driver/drm/linux-core/radeon_drv.h:274: confused by earlier errors, bailing out I see further back you fed the gcc 4.0 compile

Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

2005-03-06 Thread Shawn Starr
. That's why I was wondering about why this tree doesn't except trivial changes. Thanks, Shawn. On March 6, 2005 00:06, you wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:16:10AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > Sounds great, I can be a QA resource for what machines I have. > > > > How d

Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

2005-03-06 Thread Shawn Starr
. That's why I was wondering about why this tree doesn't except trivial changes. Thanks, Shawn. On March 6, 2005 00:06, you wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:16:10AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: Sounds great, I can be a QA resource for what machines I have. How do people get involved in QAing

Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

2005-03-04 Thread Shawn Starr
Sounds great, I can be a QA resource for what machines I have. How do people get involved in QAing these releases? What other help? Shawn. > List: linux-kernel > Subject:Linux 2.6.11.1 > From: Greg KH > Date: 2005-03-04 17:53:02 > Message-ID: <20050304175302.GA29289 ()

Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

2005-03-04 Thread Shawn Starr
How does this fit into Rusty's trivial patch bot? This process will fold that into a formal method now? Shawn. > List: linux-kernel > Subject:[RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree > From: Greg KH > Date: 2005-03-04 22:21:46 > Message-ID:

Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

2005-03-04 Thread Shawn Starr
How does this fit into Rusty's trivial patch bot? This process will fold that into a formal method now? Shawn. List: linux-kernel Subject:[RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree From: Greg KH greg () kroah ! com Date: 2005-03-04 22:21:46

Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

2005-03-04 Thread Shawn Starr
Sounds great, I can be a QA resource for what machines I have. How do people get involved in QAing these releases? What other help? Shawn. List: linux-kernel Subject:Linux 2.6.11.1 From: Greg KH greg () kroah ! com Date: 2005-03-04 17:53:02 Message-ID:

SELinux and sysfs

2005-02-26 Thread Shawn Starr
Perhaps in future, maybe SELinux could take advantage of sysfs to modify some policies? Is this doable? Sure, we still need some flat files for static configurations, but what about dynamic ones? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

SELinux and sysfs

2005-02-26 Thread Shawn Starr
Perhaps in future, maybe SELinux could take advantage of sysfs to modify some policies? Is this doable? Sure, we still need some flat files for static configurations, but what about dynamic ones? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

[2.6.11-rc3] - Slow boot up

2005-02-05 Thread Shawn Starr
>From -rc2 to -rc3 I noticed a serious slowdown during initial bootup, it takes the system a lot longer to probe devices. Anyone else noticed this? I have a T42 laptop, I will be testing this on another system to see if this is noticed as well. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

[2.6.11-rc3] - Slow boot up

2005-02-05 Thread Shawn Starr
From -rc2 to -rc3 I noticed a serious slowdown during initial bootup, it takes the system a lot longer to probe devices. Anyone else noticed this? I have a T42 laptop, I will be testing this on another system to see if this is noticed as well. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement - again...

2005-01-29 Thread Shawn Starr
Description: Cleanup some cluttered macros, add error checking for fan divisor value set. Signed-off-by: Sytse Wielinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: Cleanup some cluttered

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement - again...

2005-01-29 Thread Shawn Starr
Description: Cleanup some cluttered macros, add error checking for fan divisor value set. Signed-off-by: Sytse Wielinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: Cleanup some cluttered macros, add error checking

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement -

2005-01-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Description: Cleanup some cluttered macros, add error checking for fan divisor value set. Approved-by: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Sytse Wielinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement -

2005-01-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Description: Cleanup some cluttered macros, add error checking for fan divisor value set. Approved-by: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Sytse Wielinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Greg KH [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

2005-01-26 Thread Shawn Starr
Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make sense. 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) --- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:57:35AM -0500, Shawn > Starr wrote: > > static inline unsigned char FAN_TO_REG(unsigned &

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

2005-01-26 Thread Shawn Starr
Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make sense. 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) --- Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:57:35AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: static inline unsigned char FAN_TO_REG(unsigned rpm, unsigned div

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit

2005-01-25 Thread Shawn Starr
: +32.38°C (hot: limit = +60°C, hyst = +65°C) : (os: limit = +54°C, hyst = +56°C) Driver works with changes applied. Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Note to self, dont use Kmail for raw diff files ---

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien)

2005-01-25 Thread Shawn Starr
: +32.38°C (hot: limit = +60°C, hyst = +65°C) : (os: limit = +54°C, hyst = +56°C) Driver works with changes applied. Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/i2c/chips/lm80.c 2005

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien)

2005-01-25 Thread Shawn Starr
: +32.38°C (hot: limit = +60°C, hyst = +65°C) : (os: limit = +54°C, hyst = +56°C) Driver works with changes applied. Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/i2c/chips/lm80.c 2005-01-26 02:04

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit

2005-01-25 Thread Shawn Starr
: +32.38°C (hot: limit = +60°C, hyst = +65°C) : (os: limit = +54°C, hyst = +56°C) Driver works with changes applied. Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Note to self, dont use Kmail for raw diff files --- linux-2.6.11-rc2

Kernel HOWTO update?

2001-07-04 Thread Shawn Starr
Section: 7.6 You forgot to run LILO, or system doesn't boot at all You might want to update the following line: "Using LILO with big drives (more than 1024 cylinders) can cause problems. See the LILO mini-HOWTO or documentation for help on that." This isn't true anymore unless your using an

Kernel HOWTO update?

2001-07-04 Thread Shawn Starr
Section: 7.6 You forgot to run LILO, or system doesn't boot at all You might want to update the following line: Using LILO with big drives (more than 1024 cylinders) can cause problems. See the LILO mini-HOWTO or documentation for help on that. This isn't true anymore unless your using an

Re: The Joy of Forking

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
Fork nothing, stop taking stupidity. The kernel SOURCES may be 26MB but that does NOT mean you have to use every driver! Shawn. On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rick Hohensee wrote: > > > > Rick Hohensee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > 2.4.5 is 26 meg now. It's time to consider forking the kernel. Alan

Re: EXT2 Filesystem permissions (bug)?

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
oh ;) I never noticed that info before, then again 2 hours of sleep might be the cause :) On 25 Jun 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > By author: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > >

EXT2 Filesystem permissions (bug)?

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
Is this a bug or something thats undocumented somewhere? dT and drwSrwSrwT are these special bits? I'm not aware of +S and +T Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
ote: > On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > > > read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42 > > > read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
: On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote: read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42 read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs

EXT2 Filesystem permissions (bug)?

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
Is this a bug or something thats undocumented somewhere? dT and drwSrwSrwT are these special bits? I'm not aware of +S and +T Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: EXT2 Filesystem permissions (bug)?

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
oh ;) I never noticed that info before, then again 2 hours of sleep might be the cause :) On 25 Jun 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel Is this a bug or something thats undocumented

Re: The Joy of Forking

2001-06-25 Thread Shawn Starr
Fork nothing, stop taking stupidity. The kernel SOURCES may be 26MB but that does NOT mean you have to use every driver! Shawn. On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rick Hohensee wrote: Rick Hohensee [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 2.4.5 is 26 meg now. It's time to consider forking the kernel. Alan has

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
, 18 Jun 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: > > Two things: > > 1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 -> > 2.4.6pre3 > > 2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result. > > 3) I now have gcc 3.00 and going to rebuild 2.4.6-pre2 and see if r

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
re3 modifications. I hope ReiserFS *MAINTAINS* compatability from slightly older revisions, or even migrates systems over to handle new issues. Shawn. On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:58:57PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote: > > When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 & pre

Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 & pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed. This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs. Anyone else notice this? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed. This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs. Anyone else notice this? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
modifications. I hope ReiserFS *MAINTAINS* compatability from slightly older revisions, or even migrates systems over to handle new issues. Shawn. On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Olivier Galibert wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:58:57PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote: When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 pre3 I noticed some

Re: Linux 2.4.6-pre3 breaks ReiserFS mount on boot

2001-06-18 Thread Shawn Starr
, 18 Jun 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: Two things: 1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 - 2.4.6pre3 2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result. 3) I now have gcc 3.00 and going to rebuild 2.4.6-pre2 and see if reiserfs panics if it doesn't there's

Re: Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T

2001-06-11 Thread Shawn Starr
s) but I've been compiling and loading the > module for a while now with 2.4.x. > > FWIW, > -- > Ken. > > On Monday, June 11, 2001, at 03:42 PM, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > > How good is the linux kernel driver for the Intel gigabit Ethernet > > NIC (copper) with

Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T

2001-06-11 Thread Shawn Starr
How good is the linux kernel driver for the Intel gigabit Ethernet NIC (copper) with the TL82543GC chipset? The card says it's a "PRO/1000T" server adapter, and it looks like the part number A19845-003. The sales guy who is promoting it says this is apparently a new card and he claims he can

Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T

2001-06-11 Thread Shawn Starr
How good is the linux kernel driver for the Intel gigabit Ethernet NIC (copper) with the TL82543GC chipset? The card says it's a PRO/1000T server adapter, and it looks like the part number A19845-003. The sales guy who is promoting it says this is apparently a new card and he claims he can get

Re: Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T

2001-06-11 Thread Shawn Starr
and loading the module for a while now with 2.4.x. FWIW, -- Ken. On Monday, June 11, 2001, at 03:42 PM, Shawn Starr wrote: How good is the linux kernel driver for the Intel gigabit Ethernet NIC (copper) with the TL82543GC chipset? The card says it's a PRO/1000T server adapter

Kernel 2.4.6-pre2 patch buglet

2001-06-09 Thread Shawn Starr
Is it me or does this patch forget to change the kernel version? ;-) make menuconfig reports pre1 still.. oh well no biggie.. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Kernel 2.4.6-pre2 patch buglet

2001-06-09 Thread Shawn Starr
Is it me or does this patch forget to change the kernel version? ;-) make menuconfig reports pre1 still.. oh well no biggie.. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: 2.4.6-pre1 unresolved symbols

2001-06-05 Thread Shawn Starr
Thanks, Patch applied. On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > I have noticed unresolves symbols for the netfilter modules. this occurs > > durning depmod -a. > > Note they are the same unresolved symbol. > > Ingo Molnar has

Re: 2.4.6-pre1 unresolved symbols

2001-06-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I have noticed unresolves symbols for the netfilter modules. this occurs durning depmod -a. Shawn. On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, George Bonser wrote: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.6-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.o > depmod: do_softirq > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols

Re: 2.4.6-pre1 unresolved symbols

2001-06-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I have noticed unresolves symbols for the netfilter modules. this occurs durning depmod -a. Shawn. On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, George Bonser wrote: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.6-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.o depmod: do_softirq depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in

Re: 2.4.6-pre1 unresolved symbols

2001-06-05 Thread Shawn Starr
Thanks, Patch applied. On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: Shawn Starr wrote: I have noticed unresolves symbols for the netfilter modules. this occurs durning depmod -a. Note they are the same unresolved symbol. Ingo Molnar has posted a patch for this, entitled [patch

Re: compile failure in 2.4.5-pre4

2001-05-21 Thread Shawn Starr
Ok, so the code was easy to fix ;p On Mon, 21 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 101 16:38:45 +1000 (EST), > Allan Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >drivers/ide/ide-pci.c:711 > > if (!IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d->devid, DEVID_CS5530) > > for (i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) >

Re: compile failure in 2.4.5-pre4

2001-05-21 Thread Shawn Starr
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586-c -o ide-pci.o ide-pci.c ide-pci.c: In function `ide_setup_pci_device': ide-pci.c:712: parse error before `hwif' make[3]: ***

Re: compile failure in 2.4.5-pre4

2001-05-21 Thread Shawn Starr
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586-c -o ide-pci.o ide-pci.c ide-pci.c: In function `ide_setup_pci_device': ide-pci.c:712: parse error before `hwif' make[3]: ***

Re: compile failure in 2.4.5-pre4

2001-05-21 Thread Shawn Starr
Ok, so the code was easy to fix ;p On Mon, 21 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: On Mon, 21 May 101 16:38:45 +1000 (EST), Allan Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: drivers/ide/ide-pci.c:711 if (!IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid, DEVID_CS5530) for (i = 0; i 1000; ++i) printf(I must scan

Mail admin notice

2001-05-20 Thread Shawn Starr
My emails may bounce between 3AM -> 8AM Est time, @Home is doing some fiber upgrades and i dont have a second MX server (as I am the domain/dns/mail etc). Please bear with bounces until then. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Mail admin notice

2001-05-20 Thread Shawn Starr
My emails may bounce between 3AM - 8AM Est time, @Home is doing some fiber upgrades and i dont have a second MX server (as I am the domain/dns/mail etc). Please bear with bounces until then. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: kernel.org: 2.4.5-pre4 missing ChangeLog info - scratch that

2001-05-19 Thread Shawn Starr
It's in ChangeLog but not patch-2.4.5.log. Shawn. On Sat, 19 May 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: > Someone add the changelog info to kernel.org? > > merci. > > Shawn. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me

kernel.org: 2.4.5-pre4 missing ChangeLog info

2001-05-19 Thread Shawn Starr
Someone add the changelog info to kernel.org? merci. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

kernel.org: 2.4.5-pre4 missing ChangeLog info

2001-05-19 Thread Shawn Starr
Someone add the changelog info to kernel.org? merci. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: kernel.org: 2.4.5-pre4 missing ChangeLog info - scratch that

2001-05-19 Thread Shawn Starr
It's in ChangeLog but not patch-2.4.5.log. Shawn. On Sat, 19 May 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: Someone add the changelog info to kernel.org? merci. Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Mail boucing...

2001-04-24 Thread Shawn Starr
Sorry if my mail has been bouncing. I've been experimenting with some configurations and I am moving tomorrow so my domain/IP will be changing. Whoever, deleted me from list, thanks. Please don't block sh0n.net though from posting. I'll read myself when my new IP is added to my domain. Thank

Mail boucing...

2001-04-24 Thread Shawn Starr
Sorry if my mail has been bouncing. I've been experimenting with some configurations and I am moving tomorrow so my domain/IP will be changing. Whoever, deleted me from list, thanks. Please don't block sh0n.net though from posting. I'll read myself when my new IP is added to my domain. Thank

Serious Latency problems : 2.4.4-pre5

2001-04-20 Thread Shawn Starr
Note: I'm not on this mailing list (for now, domain IP is changing). Please email directly 1) I've noticed very high CPU load 3.00 running ./configure alone 2) some gnome applications (Gnome Mailcheck broke with 2.4.4-pre5) 3) Resolving local domains takes an awful long time (though netscape)

Serious Latency problems : 2.4.4-pre5

2001-04-20 Thread Shawn Starr
Note: I'm not on this mailing list (for now, domain IP is changing). Please email directly 1) I've noticed very high CPU load 3.00 running ./configure alone 2) some gnome applications (Gnome Mailcheck broke with 2.4.4-pre5) 3) Resolving local domains takes an awful long time (though netscape)

Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
You should be ok :) On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. > > > Thanks, > Jeff > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
You should be ok :) On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote: Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. Thanks, Jeff [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the future?

2001-04-03 Thread Shawn Starr
I've had 0, Ziltch problems with ReiserFS at the moment. It's solid for me. On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > If I get the DVD stuff working, then I won't need NT anymore, i.e. > I will have an empty disk. > > What is your impression about ReiserFS? Does it work? Is it

Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the future?

2001-04-03 Thread Shawn Starr
I've had 0, Ziltch problems with ReiserFS at the moment. It's solid for me. On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, If I get the DVD stuff working, then I won't need NT anymore, i.e. I will have an empty disk. What is your impression about ReiserFS? Does it work? Is it stable

Re: Strange lines in dmesg

2001-03-30 Thread Shawn Starr
Na, thats ok, that's just a dumping of debug info :) Not to worry. On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Denis Perchine wrote: > Hello, > > I got the following lines in dmesg: > > freesibling > task PCstack pid father child younger older >

Re: Strange lines in dmesg

2001-03-30 Thread Shawn Starr
Na, thats ok, that's just a dumping of debug info :) Not to worry. On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Denis Perchine wrote: Hello, I got the following lines in dmesg: freesibling task PCstack pid father child younger older init

Re: [WISHLIST] Addition of suspend patch into 2.5?

2001-03-29 Thread Shawn Starr
o grab the laptop and travel. > Id' like to see this working nice in 2.6. > > Best regards, > r > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:43:08 +0100 > > From: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Shawn Starr &l

Re: [WISHLIST] Addition of suspend patch into 2.5?

2001-03-29 Thread Shawn Starr
Id' like to see this working nice in 2.6. Best regards, r On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:43:08 +0100 From: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED], lkm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WISHLIST] Addition of suspend patch into 2

Re: Disturbing news..

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
dont know what). Even if it's user level, this cant affect files with root permissions (unless root is running them or suid). Any idea? On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:16:02AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:16:02 -

Re: Disturbing news.. Idea

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Why not make a new file permission? to deny a ELF binary the ability to modify the ELF entry point? like +p if the file had +p (by default) the kernel would deny the ELF binary the ability to modify files. Shawn. On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: > > http://news.cnet.com/news/

Disturbing news..

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5329436.html?tag=lh Isn't it time to change the ELF format to stop this crap? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Kernel QA

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
I disagree, 2.4.x is "stable" and as such we need as many people to use the kernels to see whats wrong with them. 2.4 *DOES* Work, I've had very small problems (ok, the thread hanging issue was a big one) but other then that It's been solid. It depends on the hardware. Shawn. On Tue, 27 Mar

Re: Kernel QA

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
I disagree, 2.4.x is "stable" and as such we need as many people to use the kernels to see whats wrong with them. 2.4 *DOES* Work, I've had very small problems (ok, the thread hanging issue was a big one) but other then that It's been solid. It depends on the hardware. Shawn. On Tue, 27 Mar

Disturbing news..

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5329436.html?tag=lh Isn't it time to change the ELF format to stop this crap? Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Disturbing news.. Idea

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Why not make a new file permission? to deny a ELF binary the ability to modify the ELF entry point? like +p if the file had +p (by default) the kernel would deny the ELF binary the ability to modify files. Shawn. On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200

Re: Disturbing news..

2001-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
dont know what). Even if it's user level, this cant affect files with root permissions (unless root is running them or suid). Any idea? On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:16:02AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:16:02 -0500 (EST) From

Re: CDROM and harddisk fighting over DMA

2001-03-20 Thread Shawn Starr
Some CDROMS can do this, My old Acer 12x cdrom was fighting with DMA with my new Fujitsu drive, I disabled the cd-rom and no more DMA errors ;-) You might also be able to fix this by rearranging the CD-ROM and drives: move the CD-ROM off the HD's IDE chain and put it separate (if its not

Re: CDROM and harddisk fighting over DMA

2001-03-20 Thread Shawn Starr
Some CDROMS can do this, My old Acer 12x cdrom was fighting with DMA with my new Fujitsu drive, I disabled the cd-rom and no more DMA errors ;-) You might also be able to fix this by rearranging the CD-ROM and drives: move the CD-ROM off the HD's IDE chain and put it separate (if its not

2.4.3-pre4: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000fb

2001-03-19 Thread Shawn Starr
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas? Shawn. ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default) -m /boot/System.map (specified) Intel

2.4.3-pre4: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000fb

2001-03-19 Thread Shawn Starr
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas? Shawn. ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default) -m /boot/System.map (specified) Intel

2.4.3-pre4: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000fb

2001-03-18 Thread Shawn Starr
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas? Shawn. ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default) -m /boot/System.map (specified)

2.4.3-pre4: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000fb

2001-03-18 Thread Shawn Starr
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas? Shawn. ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default) -m /boot/System.map (specified)

Re: Odd error message..

2001-02-28 Thread Shawn Starr
hehe, your not the only one getting that :) I get it from the sg.o module. (it appears). Aaron Sethman wrote: > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed. > > I get many of these across the console when testing a network application > that. Basically the client opens up a bunch of connections

Re: Odd error message..

2001-02-28 Thread Shawn Starr
hehe, your not the only one getting that :) I get it from the sg.o module. (it appears). Aaron Sethman wrote: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed. I get many of these across the console when testing a network application that. Basically the client opens up a bunch of connections to

<    1   2   3   4   >