On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Marty Fouts wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > 3) some ISP systems yield
From: Marty Fouts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:30:33 -0700
> -Original Message-
> From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:30:33PM -0700, Marty Fouts wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > 3) some ISP systems yield 500 series errors with text:
> > "system is temporarily busy"
> > or something of that effect. Now THAT is really offensive
> > stupidity by the ISP software folks...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
[snip]
>
> 3) some ISP systems yield 500 series errors with text:
> "system is temporarily
-Original Message-
From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
[snip]
3) some ISP systems yield 500 series errors with text:
"system is temporarily busy"
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:30:33PM -0700, Marty Fouts wrote:
[snip]
3) some ISP systems yield 500 series errors with text:
"system is temporarily busy"
or something of that effect. Now THAT is really offensive
stupidity by the ISP software folks...
sigh There is
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Marty Fouts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
[snip]
3) some ISP systems yield 500 series errors
From: Marty Fouts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:30:33 -0700
-Original Message-
From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADMIN] some list related topics ..
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:12PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> 8< snip >8
>
> > For the subset 1 above, I am preparing to begin to run regularly
> > (weekly very least, daily possibly) scanner which tries interactive
> > testing of recipients address at all of user's domain's MX servers,
>
Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -> me & DaveM) got just reports that
> somebody is diverting incoming email to some sort of auto-responding
> ticket system.
>
> The thing does not carry original message "Received:" headers in replies,
> and is reporting invalid
Matti Aarnio wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
> > is a crime in the US.
> > Perhaps Matt was wrong?
>
> Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
> is a crime in the US.
> Perhaps Matt was wrong?
Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
(lawyer mind?) vs. me
It's up to you guys what you want to do. I was just giving you a bigger
club to use, if you
needed it. Playing games with LKML is not cool since about a dozen
companies who ship Linux
(including now us) depend on it as an "essential facility" of our
businesses to get bug reports
and track the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:40:36PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Matt,
>
> A legal perspective.
>
> It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
> emails on the internet,
...
> I would suggest calling the FBI office in your area and file a formal
> complaint. You can be
Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
is a crime in the US.
Perhaps Matt was wrong?
:-)
Jeff
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > If
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> If someone committs a crime in the US, and you don't report it, you have
> also just committed another one by failing to report it (like if you
> witness a murder, and turn and
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:40:36 -0600
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A legal perspective.
We have no interest in sending the FBI to go knock down someones
doors, just removing the offending address and fixing the problem,
thats all.
I used to live in New Jersey,
Matt,
A legal perspective.
It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
emails on the internet,
esspecially across interstate lines. It's also a Felony (Federal) to
misuse and email
address to disrupt interstate or international commerce.
I would suggest calling the
Matt,
A legal perspective.
It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
emails on the internet,
esspecially across interstate lines. It's also a Felony (Federal) to
misuse and email
address to disrupt interstate or international commerce.
I would suggest calling the
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:40:36 -0600
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A legal perspective.
We have no interest in sending the FBI to go knock down someones
doors, just removing the offending address and fixing the problem,
thats all.
I used to live in New Jersey, where
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
If someone committs a crime in the US, and you don't report it, you have
also just committed another one by failing to report it (like if you
witness a murder, and turn and walk
Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
is a crime in the US.
Perhaps Matt was wrong?
:-)
Jeff
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
If someone
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:40:36PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Matt,
A legal perspective.
It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
emails on the internet,
...
I would suggest calling the FBI office in your area and file a formal
complaint. You can be assured
It's up to you guys what you want to do. I was just giving you a bigger
club to use, if you
needed it. Playing games with LKML is not cool since about a dozen
companies who ship Linux
(including now us) depend on it as an "essential facility" of our
businesses to get bug reports
and track the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
is a crime in the US.
Perhaps Matt was wrong?
Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
(lawyer mind?) vs. me
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
is a crime in the US.
Perhaps Matt was wrong?
Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
Matti Aarnio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - me DaveM) got just reports that
somebody is diverting incoming email to some sort of auto-responding
ticket system.
The thing does not carry original message "Received:" headers in replies,
and is reporting invalid URL.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:12PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
8 snip 8
For the subset 1 above, I am preparing to begin to run regularly
(weekly very least, daily possibly) scanner which tries interactive
testing of recipients address at all of user's domain's MX servers,
and if any
28 matches
Mail list logo
