Re: Intel's ANS Driver -vs- Bonding [was Re: Linux 2.2.18pre21]

2000-11-11 Thread willy tarreau
EtherChannel. Supposedly, it also supports failover (though even "bonding" driver docs used to say that was impossible because the linux networking subsystem didn't handle card failures gracefully enough). the new bonding code supports failover. It probes the cards itself. Although this is

[OFF] Load avarage (Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachmentsin /var/spool/mqueue)

2000-11-11 Thread Kari E. Hurtta
Claus Assmann: Why does Linux report a LA of 10 if there are only two processes running? [This goes out of subject] I have learned that load avarage means "Processes on run queue" + "process waiting disk (or short-term) I/O" That was before Linux times. I have seen a

opl3 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-11 Thread Mark Hindley
I am trying to setup my ALS 110 soundcard under my build of kernel 2.4.0-test10. I have built in isapnp support and also the sb and opl3 drivers. The sb driver works fine other than complaining about a missing 16 bit DMA (which I understand is missing from the card anyway). I can play and

thanks for your help

2000-11-11 Thread Michele Iacobellis
Hello all, thanks for your help ! -- # Eng. Michele Iacobellis # RD - Linux Impresa # [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: newbie in kernel

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: The default limit is the 0.25 * physpages but you can change that easily by: echo 10 /proc/sys/threads-max ~ typo - read /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max (haven't you read LKI -- it explains you how to do

Re: [bug] usb-uhci locks up on boot half the time

2000-11-11 Thread Harald Nordgård-Hansen
David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The oddity is that kdb shows the machine to lock up on the popf in pci_conf_write_word()+0x2c. I never did get around to digging up this routine and looking at the code, but I suspect this is a final return from the routine. I'm rather confused however,

Re: crash @ 64 day's of uptime

2000-11-11 Thread willy tarreau
Hi Robert, in the company I left 3 months ago, there is a DNS which has more than 500 days uptime now. It's based on 2.2.10 and receives requests from internet and intranet. I know this kernel is pretty old, but you could try it on an unused system to see if it goes down in 64 days or not. It

Re: USB mouse stops working

2000-11-11 Thread Gerald Haese
Am Samstag, 11. November 2000 01:40 schrieb Greg KH: I'm using an SMP system. Everything works fine and (absolutely) stable - exept my USB mouse :-( It's the USB version of the Wacom Graphire tablet. The mouse works great for some minutes or up to half an hour and it generates a lot of

Re: test11-pre2 compile error undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks' WHAT?!

2000-11-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: George Anzinger wrote: The notion of releasing a spin lock by initializing it seems IMHO, on the face of it, way off. Firstly the protected area is no longer protected which could lead to undefined errors/ crashes and secondly, any future use

Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550

2000-11-11 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
I haven't tried compiling the kernel 2.2.17 with my K6-2 @ 550 but the newest 2.4.0-tests seem to work fine. - Riku The 2.4.0test10 pukes on me in much the same way. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2, I stand corrected.

2000-11-11 Thread Max Inux
Mike Harris corrected me, which puts life back where it started reading other replies. bzimage = Big zImage removing the 640K limitation. I have not upgraded to 2.4.0-test11-pre2 from test10, when I do I will see if I get simmilar results. Sorry, William Tiemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On x86 machines there is a size limitation on booting. Though I thought it was 1024K as the max, 900K should be fine. No, there isn't. There used to be, but it has been fixed. Are

Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550

2000-11-11 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, root wrote: Hello kernel hackers, I am having problems with compiling a kernel on an AMD K62-550. I am running Red Hat 6.2, and am getting error messages like this: cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff V. Merkey) writes: We got to the bottom of the sendmail problem. The line: -O QueueLA=20 and -O RefuseLA=18 Need to be cranked up in sendmail.cf to something high since the background VM on a very busy Linux box seems to exceed this which causes large emails to

Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]

2000-11-11 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff V. Merkey) writes: The sendmail folks are claiming that the TCPIP stack in Linux is broken, which is what they claim is causing problems on sendmail on Linux platforms. Before anyone says, "don't use that piece of shit sendmail, use qmail instead", perhaps we should look

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard A Nelson) writes: I have several boxen running sendmail with fair to moderate loading - they even occasionally don't accept mail... and thats good, as it lets the system catch up with its current load. As soon as things stabalize, sendmail again accepts connections -

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Max Inux wrote: gzip, actually. I can verify here "make bzImage" does the expected thing and it looks normal-sized to me. I believe there is zImage (gzip) and bzImage (bzip2). (Or is it compress vs gzip, but then why bzImage vs gzImage?) Neither. They are both

Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550

2000-11-11 Thread Timothy DeWees
Hey thanks guys, I was able to get it to compile when I set my AMD K62-550 to run at 500 Mhz. This disturbs me a but but at least I can play with the 2.4test/pre series, and I am on my way to a kernel hacker. Kernel hackers can get a bad rap sometimes, and I know that you take a lot

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:47:50PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: 2b) If yes, write a perl script to compute symbol sizes from each System.map file. (Symbol size == address of next symbol minus address of this symbol.) Sort numerically, then compare old vs new for symbols that

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:36:00AM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Are you sure? I thought the fix was to build 2 page tables for 0-8M Paging is disabled at that point. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:36:00AM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Are you sure? I thought the fix was to build 2 page tables for 0-8M Paging is disabled at that point. Yes, Andrea, I know that paging is disabled at the point of loading the

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Jasper Spaans
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:25:00AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: Oh no. Another one. Could you please try this attached patch (against test11-pre2) and see if the diagnostics come out? And yet another one... I applied your patch, and ran my

Bugs and oopses

2000-11-11 Thread adrian
Hello folks, I had been reporting (rather inadequately) a few bugs and oopses that I had encountered, however, after a bit of hardware swapping, I found that these were all related to bad RAM (or discrepancies in timings). So, my apologies for cluttering. Thanks to all. Regards, Adrian -

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Thomas Köhler
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:47:50PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: 2b) If yes, write a perl script to compute symbol sizes from each System.map file. (Symbol size == address of next symbol minus address

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Max Inux wrote: On x86 machines there is a size limitation on booting. Though I thought it was 1024K as the max, 900K should be fine. No, there isn't. There used to be, but it has been fixed. -hpa Except the simple boot loader. You cannot boot kernel =1024KB directly from

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:51:21PM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Yes, Andrea, I know that paging is disabled at the point of loading the image but I was talking about the inability to boot (boot == complete booting, i.e. at least reach start_kernel()) a kernel with very large .data or .bss

Re: Problems with NFS in 2.4test10

2000-11-11 Thread Ingo Rohloff
Ingo, do you have a BP6? Make sure you have the latest BIOS for your motherboard, there have been many BIOS updates for some dual-Celeron motherboards. I have to admit that I'm not sure what kind of dual board I got (i have to have a closer look). The reason is that this board is orgiginally

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:51:21PM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Yes, Andrea, I know that paging is disabled at the point of loading the image but I was talking about the inability to boot (boot == complete booting, i.e. at least reach

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

2000-11-11 Thread tytso
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:29:26 -0800 From: "Matt D. Robinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] We're planning to isolate the write functions as much as possible. In the past, we've been bitten by this whole concept of Linux "raw I/O". When I was at SGI, we were able to write to a block device

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:54:20PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 05:46:29PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Yes, the documentation is broken. Linus did in fact implement this Well, also the implementation could be improved IMHO, think when we have one houndred of

Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]

2000-11-11 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 01:24:18PM +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff V. Merkey) writes: I did Dick. The config is fine. The daemon is also fine and running. What's really weird is that even if I do a "sendmail -v -q" command (which should force the queue to

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 01:40:42PM +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff V. Merkey) writes: We got to the bottom of the sendmail problem. The line: -O QueueLA=20 and -O RefuseLA=18 Need to be cranked up in sendmail.cf to something high since the

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: Except the simple boot loader. You cannot boot kernel =1024KB directly from floppy... That doesn't really matter much though... You have proceded beyond the 'simple' case. :) You can always use a tiny bootloader like hpa's syslinux. I am currently typing on a

Tracing files that opens.

2000-11-11 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(b\)
Is there a nice way to trap on file open() and stat() ? That way i could have nice file statistics. Magnus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Programmer/Networker [|] Magnus Naeslund PGP Key: http://www.genline.nu/mag_pgp.txt

[patch] wakeup_bdflush related fixes and nfsd optimizations for test10

2000-11-11 Thread Ying Chen/Almaden/IBM
Hi, This patch includes two sets of things against test10: First, there are several places where schedule() is called after wakeup_bdflush(1) is called. This is completely unnecessary, since wakeup_bdflush(1) already gave up the control, and when the control is returned to the calling thread who

Re: Tracing files that opens.

2000-11-11 Thread Michael Vines
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Magnus Naeslund(b) wrote: Is there a nice way to trap on file open() and stat() ? That way i could have nice file statistics. There was a thread about this a couple days ago. http://x52.deja.com/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=690272012.1mhitnum=0CONTEXT=973965178.1986985995

RE: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-11 Thread michael
We have the SUPER 370DL3 SuperMicro boards w/ the integrated Intel NIC, unfortunately a warm boot does not help. The problem also seems to happen when I turn on the alias ip feature in the kernel under network options. On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Allen, David B wrote: FWIW, I have a dual-proc

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:03:35AM -0800, Robert Lynch wrote: sys_nfsservctl 80 1060 980 +1225.0 dump_extended_fpu8 84 76 +950.00 get_fpregs 36 372 336 +933.33 schedule_tail

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Robert Lynch
Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:03:35AM -0800, Robert Lynch wrote: sys_nfsservctl 80 1060 980 +1225.0 dump_extended_fpu8 84 76 +950.00 get_fpregs 36 372 336 +933.33

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff V. Merkey) writes: I guess all customers are idiots then, since about 100+ people who were using our release downloaded it, and had these problems with sendmail. This disconnect of yours is about what I would expect from someone in a University. Some of us don't have the

Re: Dual XEON - SLOW on SMP

2000-11-11 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 04:03:25PM -0700, "Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Lehman verified that PII systems will generate tons of AGIs with gcc. It is a bit late (just came back from the systems'00 fair), but Jeff Merkey just acknowledged that indeed he meant me with "Marc

Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?

2000-11-11 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The cobalt machines have now had a kernel upgrade (only to 2.2.14, thats the most recent that Cobalt provide...), and the problem has disappeared. Should we ignore "timestamp 0" if there are systems out there which will break on that. Or is timestamp 0

Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue

2000-11-11 Thread J Sloan
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: NT and NetWare servers don't stop forwarding emails when the load average gets too high -- they just work out of the box, and hopefully, no so will Linux (our distribution does now since this problem in fixed). Don't get me started on nt - saying it "just works" is a

IDE DMA/lost interrupt problem with RAID0

2000-11-11 Thread BJerrick
Can anyone shed some light on this? I get "lost interrupt" or "timeout waiting for DMA" (and a subsequent reset) when reading software RAID0 (striped) partitions using IDE drives, iff I enable any of the following: % hdparm -c1 /dev/hda /dev/hdc (enable 32-bit I/O) % hdparm

Re: Tracing files that opens.

2000-11-11 Thread Karim Yaghmour
It seems that no one on that thread thought about using the Linux Trace Toolkit which would allow you to do exactly what is asked for. Plus, there's a basic hooking mechanism than enables you to hook onto any file-system events and then do what you want with that. In the case of trapping open()

Re: Tracing files that opens.

2000-11-11 Thread willy tarreau
Is there a nice way to trap on file open() and stat() ? a few months ago, I helped a friend in writing a generic syscall wrapper because he needed exactly this. You should take a look at the section "overloader" on http://bdolez.free.fr/ Regards, willy

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Max Inux wrote: gzip, actually. I can verify here "make bzImage" does the expected thing and it looks normal-sized to me. I believe there is zImage (gzip) and bzImage (bzip2). (Or is it compress vs gzip, but then why bzImage vs gzImage?) b is "big". They are both gzip compressed.

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Tigran Aivazian wrote: On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On x86 machines there is a size limitation on booting. Though I thought it was 1024K as the max, 900K should be fine. No, there isn't. There used to be, but it has been fixed. Are you sure? I thought the

Re: [patch] nfsd optimizations for test10

2000-11-11 Thread Neil Brown
On Friday November 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I made some optimizations on racache in nfsd in test10. The idea is to replace with existing fixed length table for readahead cache in NFSD with a hash table. The old racache is essentially ineffective in dealing with large # of files,

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Michael Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Eric W. Biederman" wrote: I have recently developed a patch that allows linux to directly boot into another linux kernel. This would rock. One place I can think of using it is with distro installers. The installer boots a generic i386

Re: opl3 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-11 Thread Stephen Thomas
Mark Hindley wrote: I am trying to setup my ALS 110 soundcard under my build of kernel 2.4.0-test10. I have built in isapnp support and also the sb and opl3 drivers. However, even though I pass opl3=0x388 on the Kernel command line all I get is an isapnp panic. I'm experiencing what

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel The interface is designed to be simple and inflexible yet very powerful. To that end the code just takes an elf binary, and a command line. The started image also

Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2

2000-11-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:57:20AM -0800, Robert Lynch wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:03:35AM -0800, Robert Lynch wrote: sys_nfsservctl 80 1060 980 +1225.0 dump_extended_fpu8 84 76 +950.00 get_fpregs

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda1 (was: Re The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda1 (was: Re The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda2 (was: Re The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda2 (was: Re The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda3 (was: Re The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda3 (was: Re The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda5 (was: Re The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda5 (was: Re The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda7 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda7 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda10 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda10 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda12 (Re: was: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda12 (Re: was: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda13 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda13 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda15 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda15 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda16 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda16 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda17 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda17 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda18 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda18 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda19 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda19 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda20 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda20 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda21 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda21 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda22 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda22 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

linux-2.4.0-test11-pre2 compilation error: undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks'

2000-11-11 Thread reiser.angus
cannot make a success compilation of 2.4.0-test11pre2 with the same .config than for a successfull 2.4.0-test10 compilation. Same problem when apply patch-2.4.0test11pre2-ac1 from alan cox arch/i386/mm/mm.o: In function `do_page_fault': arch/i386/mm/mm.o(.text+0x821): undefined reference to

[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda23 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)[patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda23 (was: Re: The IrDA patches)

2000-11-11 Thread Dag Brattli
Linus, Here are the new IrDA patches for Linux-2.4.0-test10. Please apply them to your latest 2.4 code. If you decide to apply them, then I suggest you start with the first one (irda1.diff) and work your way to the last one (irda24.diff) since most of them are not commutative. The name of

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-11 Thread tytso
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:10:52 -0800 (PST) From: James Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] * VGA Console can cause SMP deadlock when doing printk {CRITICAL} (Keith Owens) Still not fixed :-( Here is the patch again. Keith give it a try and tell me if it solves your

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

2000-11-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2000-11-10T19:12:29, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Great! Are you thinking about putting the crash dumper and the raw write disk routines in a separate text section, so they can be located in pages which are write-protected from accidental modification in case some kernel

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11-pre2 compilation error: undefined referenceto `bust_spinlocks'

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, reiser.angus wrote: cannot make a success compilation of 2.4.0-test11pre2 with the same .config than for a successfull 2.4.0-test10 compilation. Same problem when apply patch-2.4.0test11pre2-ac1 from alan cox arch/i386/mm/mm.o: In function `do_page_fault':

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11-pre2 compilation error: undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks'

2000-11-11 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"reiser.angus" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cannot make a success compilation of 2.4.0-test11pre2 with the same .config than for a successfull 2.4.0-test10 compilation. Same problem when apply patch-2.4.0test11pre2-ac1 from alan cox arch/i386/mm/mm.o: In function `do_page_fault':

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Adam Lazur
Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I have recently developed a patch that allows linux to directly boot into another linux kernel. With the code freeze it appears inappropriate to submit it at this time. Aside from what looks to be support for SMP, how does this differ from the two

[PATCH] mpu401 bugfix

2000-11-11 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Some mpu401 functions are used in many sound drivers thus they can't be marked __init. This patch should allow using these drivers as modules... -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-240t11p2/drivers/sound/mpu401.c Tue Oct 3 00:17:48 2000 +++

[PATCH] drivers/sound gets __init/__exit/__initdata

2000-11-11 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi Patch adds __init/__exit/__initdata tags to various sound drivers. I have reviewed it many times so it should be 100% safe... I have also documented changes so people know who they should shot ;) Patch against 2.4.0-test11-pre2. Please apply... BTW: Is drivers/sound/Hwmcode.h only in my

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Adam Lazur
Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Michael Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would rock. One place I can think of using it is with distro installers. The installer boots a generic i386 kernel, and then installs an optimized (i.e, PIII, etc.) kernel for run-time. This

[PATCH] drivers/char/drm gets __init/__exit

2000-11-11 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi Patch is against 2.4.0-test11-pre2... subject tells rest... Regards -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -uNr linux-240t11p2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c linux/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c --- linux-240t11p2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c Tue Oct 3 00:17:32 2000 +++

Re: What protects f_pos?

2000-11-11 Thread tytso
From: David Wragg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:04 Nov 2000 22:16:18 + Since f_pos of struct file is a loff_t, on 32-bit architectures it needs a lock to make accesses atomic (or some more sophisticated form of protection). But looking in 2.4.0-test10, there doesn't seem to

[PATCH] [drivers/sound] ld2() moved to include

2000-11-11 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi This is cleanup patch... 9 sound drivers use the same logarithm base 2 inline... so patch moves it to drivers/sound/ld2.h BTW: drivers/usb/devio.c and audio.c also uses this ld2() inline Regards -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -uNr

Re: Where is it written?

2000-11-11 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Andrea Arcangeli] Can you think at one case where it's better to push the parameter on the stack instead of passing them through the callee clobbered ebx/eax/edx? Well it's safer if you are lazy about prototyping varargs functions. But of course by doing that you're treading on thin ice

Re: Where is it written?

2000-11-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel [Andrea Arcangeli] Can you think at one case where it's better to push the parameter on the stack instead of passing them through the callee clobbered ebx/eax/edx? Well it's

sendfile(2) fails for devices?

2000-11-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
sendfile(2) fails with -EINVAL every time I try to read from a device file. This sounds like a bug... is it? (the man page doesn't mention such a restriction) I am using kernel 2.4.0-test11-pre2. All other tests with sendfile(2) succeed: file-file, file-STDOUT, STDIN-file... -- Jeff Garzik

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"H. Peter Anvin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel The interface is designed to be simple and inflexible yet very powerful. To that end the code just takes an elf binary,

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Michael Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would rock. One place I can think of using it is with distro installers. The installer boots a generic i386 kernel, and then installs an optimized (i.e,

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I have recently developed a patch that allows linux to directly boot into another linux kernel. With the code freeze it appears inappropriate to submit it at this time. Aside from what looks to be

Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux.

2000-11-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
"Eric W. Biederman" wrote: Hmm. You must mean similiar to milo. Have fun. With linuxBIOS I'm working exactly the other way. Killing off the BIOS. And letting the initial firmware be just a boot loader. The reduction is complexity should make it more reliable. ... except that you

Re: sendfile(2) fails for devices?

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sendfile(2) fails with -EINVAL every time I try to read from a device file. This sounds like a bug... is it? (the man page doesn't mention such a restriction) sendfile() on purpose only works on things that use the page cache.

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Jasper Spaans wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:25:00AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: Oh no. Another one. Could you please try this attached patch (against test11-pre2) and see if the diagnostics come out? And yet another one...

Re: [patch] patch-2.4.0-test10-irda24 (resend)

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Dag Brattli wrote: (resending in case it got lost, didn't show up on linux-kernel) Didn't get lost, but I think the linux-kernel size filter killed it from the kernel list. Everything applied. Thanks, Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 12:32:55 +1100, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: That's a pretty wierd trace. You seem to have addresses related to the `apm' kernel thread on mysqld's stack. Normal unfortunately. Firstly the ix86 oops code just

Re: [patch] wakeup_bdflush related fixes and nfsd optimizations fortest10

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Ying Chen/Almaden/IBM wrote: This patch includes two sets of things against test10: First, there are several places where schedule() is called after wakeup_bdflush(1) is called. This is completely unnecessary Fair enough. Second, (I have posted this to the kernel

Re: The IrDA patches !!! (was Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status)

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
Ok, thanks to the work of Jean, everything seems to be applied now. I'll make a test3 one of these days (probably tomorrow), please verify that everything looks happy. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH] show_task() and thread_saved_pc() fix for x86

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: diff -urN rc11-2/include/asm-i386/processor.h rc11-2-show_task/include/asm-i386/processor.h --- rc11-2/include/asm-i386/processor.h Fri Nov 10 09:14:04 2000 +++ rc11-2-show_task/include/asm-i386/processor.h Fri Nov 10 16:08:15 2000 @@

[PATCH] CDROMPLAYTRKIND translation in sr_ioctl.c for idescsi

2000-11-11 Thread Daniel R Risacher
Summary: Many audio-cdrom-playing programs don't work correctly with ATAPI CDROM drives under ide-scsi translation, because ATAPI doesn't support the PLAYAUDIO_TI command. The ide-cd driver handles this by transforming CDROMPLAYTRKIND ioctls into something that the ATAPI drive will understand,

Re: The IrDA patches !!! (was Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status)

2000-11-11 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 06:43:26PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Ok, thanks to the work of Jean, everything seems to be applied now. I'll make a test3 one of these days (probably tomorrow), please verify that everything looks happy. Linus Linus, Sorry to

Re: [PATCH] show_task() and thread_saved_pc() fix for x86

2000-11-11 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: diff -urN rc11-2/include/asm-i386/processor.h rc11-2-show_task/include/asm-i386/processor.h --- rc11-2/include/asm-i386/processor.h Fri Nov 10 09:14:04 2000 +++

2.4.0-test11-pre3

2000-11-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
Drivers, drivers, drivers. IrDA and ISDN. PPC. The most interesting part is probably the exclusive wait-queue patch. David Miller noticed that exclusivity doesn't nest correctly the way we used to do it: being on multiple wait-queues would potentially cause lost wake-up events if a

  1   2   3   >