> On Jun 27, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> This bug also got reported 2 days later by the kernel test robot
> (lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200623090213.GW5535@shao2-debian/).
> Then it was fixed by commit 437edcaafbe3, so telling syzbot:
>
> #syz fix: mm, slab/slub: improve error
[+Cc linux-mm; +Bcc linux-fsdevel]
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:28:09AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 22, 2020, at 2:42 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > There is a reason, it's still important for us.
> > But also it's not our strategy to deal with bugs by not testing
> > configurations
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 2:42 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> There is a reason, it's still important for us.
> But also it's not our strategy to deal with bugs by not testing
> configurations and closing eyes on bugs, right? If it's an official
> config in the kernel, it needs to be tested. If
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:29 AM Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Jun 22, 2020, at 1:37 AM, syzbot
> > wrote:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/slab.h:232 kmem_cache_free+0x0/0x200
> > mm/slab.c:2262
>
> Is there any particular reason to use CONFIG_SLAB rather than CONFIG_SLUB?
There is a reason,
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 1:37 AM, syzbot
> wrote:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/slab.h:232 kmem_cache_free+0x0/0x200
> mm/slab.c:2262
Is there any particular reason to use CONFIG_SLAB rather than CONFIG_SLUB?
You are really asking for trouble to test something that almost nobody is
Hello,
syzbot found the following crash on:
HEAD commit:5a94f5bc Add linux-next specific files for 20200621
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12a02c7610
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e1788c418b2ddc66
dashboard
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Stephan Müller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. April 2018, 13:18:06 CEST schrieb Dmitry Vyukov:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
>>
>> Running syz-repro utility on this log, I think I've found the guilty guy:
>>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Stephan Müller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. April 2018, 13:18:06 CEST schrieb Dmitry Vyukov:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
>>
>> Running syz-repro utility on this log, I think I've found the guilty guy:
>> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/1dd75d55efd238e7207af1cc38478b3a/
Am Sonntag, 8. April 2018, 13:18:06 CEST schrieb Dmitry Vyukov:
Hi Dmitry,
>
> Running syz-repro utility on this log, I think I've found the guilty guy:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/1dd75d55efd238e7207af1cc38478b3a/
> raw/403859b56b161a6fbb158e8953fac5bb6e73b1a1/gistfile1.txt
>
Am Sonntag, 8. April 2018, 13:18:06 CEST schrieb Dmitry Vyukov:
Hi Dmitry,
>
> Running syz-repro utility on this log, I think I've found the guilty guy:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/1dd75d55efd238e7207af1cc38478b3a/
> raw/403859b56b161a6fbb158e8953fac5bb6e73b1a1/gistfile1.txt
>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
>>>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
>>> wrote:
>>> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
>> wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
>> wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
>>
>> Interesting type of bug, I think we see this for
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
>
> Interesting type of bug, I think we see this for the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
>
> Interesting type of bug, I think we see this for the first time.
Can you focus syzbot to try to find a
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Interesting type of bug, I think we see this for the first time.
>
> Al, do you see how this can happen?
putname() on something that hasn't come from getname(). Short
of reproducer, I don't see what can be done - it can be any
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Interesting type of bug, I think we see this for the first time.
>
> Al, do you see how this can happen?
putname() on something that hasn't come from getname(). Short
of reproducer, I don't see what can be done - it can be any
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> f2d285669aae656dfeafa0bf25e86bbbc5d22329 (Tue Apr 3 17:45:39 2018 +)
> Merge tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of
>
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> f2d285669aae656dfeafa0bf25e86bbbc5d22329 (Tue Apr 3 17:45:39 2018 +)
> Merge tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
> syzbot dashboard
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
f2d285669aae656dfeafa0bf25e86bbbc5d22329 (Tue Apr 3 17:45:39 2018 +)
Merge tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
syzbot dashboard link:
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
f2d285669aae656dfeafa0bf25e86bbbc5d22329 (Tue Apr 3 17:45:39 2018 +)
Merge tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
syzbot dashboard link:
22 matches
Mail list logo