Mauro,
Resend of my proposed patch attached that reverts tuning regressions with
my DViCO card, whilst still fixing the original 6Mhz tuning issue. Please
merge or let me know how else I should proceed to get this merged.
Thanks
-Rob
perhaps the attached notes will help Rob's case here.
Hello together,
after the last thread which asked about signal statistics details
degenerated into a discussion about the technical possibilites for
implementing an entirely new API, which lead to nothing so far, I wanted
to open a new thread to bring this forward. Maybe some more people can
Dmitry Torokhov a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 06:54:39PM +0100, Emmanuel Fusté wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
In summary,
While the current EVIO[G|S]KEYCODE works sub-optimally for scancodes up
to 16 bytes
(since a read loop for 2^16 is not that expensive), the current
Hallo Thomas!
Am 02.12.2009 15:31, schrieb Thomas Kernen:
Is someone already working on supporting the TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 PCIe
card? http://www.tbsdtv.com/english/product/6980.html
Have you seen/tried their all-in-one linux source package which was
released 2009-12-03?
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
That is why I think we should go the other way around - introduce the
core which receivers could plug into and decoder framework and once it
is ready register lirc-dev as one of the available
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Andy Walls awa...@radix.net writes:
I would also note that RC-6 Mode 6A, used by
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Andy Walls
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:44:14PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
What about capabilities of the receiver, what frequencies?
If a receiver has multiple frequencies, how do you report what
frequency the data came in on?
IMO, via sysfs.
We probably need to think
Am 08.12.09 10:16, schrieb Julian Scheel:
Hello together,
after the last thread which asked about signal statistics details
degenerated into a discussion about the technical possibilites for
implementing an entirely new API, which lead to nothing so far, I
wanted to open a new thread to
World's No 1 doctor recommended solution to many of the common intimacy
problems. http://dhwtd.ecwyqutt.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the month.
I can setup the CX2388[58] hardware to look for both RC-5 and RC-6 with
a
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:32 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the month.
Good! Please, try to design the decoder as an independent
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the month.
I can setup
Hi Julian,
Let me add some corrections to your technical analysis.
Julian Scheel wrote:
Hello together,
after the last thread which asked about signal statistics details
degenerated into a discussion about the technical possibilites for
implementing an entirely new API, which lead to
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the month.
I can setup the CX2388[58] hardware to look for both RC-5 and
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Hallo Thomas!
Am 02.12.2009 15:31, schrieb Thomas Kernen:
Is someone already working on supporting the TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 PCIe
card? http://www.tbsdtv.com/english/product/6980.html
Have you seen/tried their all-in-one linux source package which was
released
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Where is the documentation for the protocol?
I'm not sure what you're meaning here. I've started a doc about IR at
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the month.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
What is the interface for attaching an in-kernel decoder?
IMO, it should use the kfifo for it. However, if we allow both raw data and
in-kernel decoders to read data there, we'll need a spinlock to protect the
kfifo.
This may be an option,
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes:
Data could be sent to the in-kernel decoders first and then if they
don't handle it, send it to user space.
Nope. It should be sent to all of them, they aren't dependent.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
Why woudl we want to do this? Quite often there is a need for observer
that maybe does not act on data but allows capturing it. Single-user
inetrfaces are PITA.
Lircd can work as a multiplexer. IMHO single-open lirc interface is ok,
though we
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
I don't think we need an userspace interface for the in-kernel
decoders.
Of course we need it, to set (and probably retrieve) scancode-keycode
mappings. This could probably be, ATM, the existing input layer channel.
All
it needs is to
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
Yes, an opaque type for scancode at the userspace API can be better, but
passing a pointer to kernel will require some compat32 logic (as pointer
size is different on 32 and 64 bits).
Yes. I think we can't avoid that, but it's a single compat
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
What is the interface for attaching an in-kernel decoder?
IMO, it should use the kfifo for it. However, if we allow both raw data and
in-kernel decoders to read data there, we'll need a spinlock to protect the
kfifo.
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
I don't think we need an userspace interface for the in-kernel
decoders.
Of course we need it, to set (and probably retrieve) scancode-keycode
mappings. This could probably be, ATM, the existing input layer channel.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
With RC-5, you have no fields describing the remote. So, all the driver could
do is an educated guess.
It can't even do that, e.g. single remotes (even the dumb ones) can send
different code groups (addresses) for different keys.
IMO, the
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
IMO, the better is to have an API to allow creation of multiple interfaces
per IR receiver, based on some scancode matching table and/or on some
matching mask.
I think setting the keytables for each logical device
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
What is the interface for attaching an in-kernel decoder?
IMO, it should use the kfifo for it. However, if we allow both raw data and
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Where is the documentation for the protocol?
I'm not sure what you're meaning here. I've started
On 04.12.2009 05:59, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
On 12/03/09 18:05, Daniel Ritz wrote:
Hi Laurent
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 21:15 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 00:48:44 Daniel Ritz wrote:
For some unknown reason, on a MacBookPro5,3 the iSight
Could you
On 2009-12-08 13:31, Thomas Kernen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Hallo Thomas!
Am 02.12.2009 15:31, schrieb Thomas Kernen:
Is someone already working on supporting the TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 PCIe
card? http://www.tbsdtv.com/english/product/6980.html
I got one last Thursday, also direct from
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
No, the IR core responsible for registering receivers and decoders.
Well. This makes me think now that LIRC can be just another decoder.
Those are simple things. The only part which needs to be stable is the
(in this case LIRC) kernel-user
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
The enable/disable protocol decoder enable/disable interface is needed anyway,
due to the needs for the hardware IR decoders
Why do they need it exactly?
The key tables say all they need I hope?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
If you use a kfifo to store the event (space_or_mark, timestamp),
the IRQ handler can return immediately, and a separate kernel thread
can do the decode without needing to touch at the IRQ.
But the decoding itself is a really simple thing,
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
The enable/disable protocol decoder enable/disable interface is needed
anyway,
due to the needs for the hardware IR decoders
Why do they need it exactly?
The key tables say all they need I hope?
You can't upload a
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
If you use a kfifo to store the event (space_or_mark, timestamp),
the IRQ handler can return immediately, and a separate kernel thread
can do the decode without needing to touch at the IRQ.
But the decoding itself
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
I accidently sent this mail to Michael's private address, I'm sorry for that.
Hi,
I bought the same card a couple of months ago and back then, it just
wouldn't work. I set up a wiki page, which henk has updated with links
to patches, to document the card as well as possible. I set up a
thread on
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
Jon Smirl wrote:
This model is complicated by the fact that some remotes that look
like multi-function remotes aren't really multifunction. The remote
bundled with the MS MCE receiver is one. That remote is a single
function device even
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
If you use a kfifo to store the event (space_or_mark, timestamp),
the IRQ handler can return immediately, and a separate kernel thread
can
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On 12/7/09, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Alan
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
It's always better to cc a suitable list, in this case it is
Linux Media Mailing List linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Sure, here we go.
I am trying to use
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:44:29AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 07:52:02AM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Andy Walls awa...@radix.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:22 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:58:53AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:44:14PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
What about capabilities of the receiver, what frequencies?
If a receiver has multiple frequencies, how do you report what
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:17:42AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Where is the documentation for the protocol?
I'm not sure what you're meaning here. I've started a doc about IR at the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 07:46:52AM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:32 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
So I'll whip up an RC-6 Mode 6A decoder for cx23885-input.c before the
end of the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:57:15PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
Why woudl we want to do this? Quite often there is a need for observer
that maybe does not act on data but allows capturing it. Single-user
inetrfaces are PITA.
Lircd can
-Original Message-
From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Karicheri, Muralidharan
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:25 PM
To: Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-media@vger.kernel.org;
hverk...@xs4all.nl; khil...@deeprootsystems.com
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Rob Beard r...@esdelle.co.uk wrote:
Hi folks,
I've borrowed a WinTV HVR-900 USB stick from a friend of mine to see if I
can get any reception in my area before forking out for one however I've run
in to a couple of problems and wondered if anyone had used one
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Tue Dec 8 19:00:02 CET 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 13588:065f9e34e07b
gcc version: gcc
Vaibhav,
I have posted a re-worked patch with clocks configuration moved
to ccdc. From your response below, I understand the clocks
are being called differently on different SoCs even though they
use the same IP. So IMO, it is better to customize it on a SoC
by defining the clock names in the
2009/9/14 Michael Krufky mkru...@kernellabs.com:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Michael Krufky mkru...@kernellabs.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:01 AM, s...@systol-ng.god.lan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:57:12PM -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
Henk,
Why do you expect a 8295?
From: Muralidharan Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
If a USERPTR address that is not aligned to page boundary is passed to the
videobuf_dma_contig_user_get() function, it saves a page aligned address to
the dma_handle. This is not correct. This issue is observed when using USERPTR
IO machism for
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
Let me add some corrections to your technical analysis.
Julian Scheel wrote:
Hello together,
after the last thread which asked about signal statistics details
degenerated into a discussion about the
Hi Dmitry,
on 06 Dec 09 at 23:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
[...]
I suppose we could add MSC_SCAN_END event so that we can transmit
scancodes of arbitrary length. You'd get several MSC_SCAN followed by
MSC_SCAN_END marker. If you don't get MSC_SCAN_END assume the code is 32
bit.
And I set a
Hi Jon,
on 08 Dec 09 at 08:34, Jon Smirl wrote:
[...]
The point of those design review questions was to illustrate that the
existing LIRC system is only partially designed. Subsystems need to be
fully designed before they get merged.
I'd say that a system that has proven itself in real world
Hi Andy,
on 07 Dec 09 at 23:10, Andy Walls wrote:
[...]
(Christoph can correct me if I get anything wrong.)
Just a few additions.
[...]
What is the time standard for the data, where does it come from?
I think it is usec, IIRC.
Yes, it is.
I know that the hardware I work with has sub 100
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes:
Why do you want to pull the 1KB default mapping table out of the
device driver __init section and more it to a udev script? Now we will
have to maintain a parallel udev script for ever receiver's device
driver.
Of course no. We will need a single program
Manu Abraham wrote:
Not true. As pointed at the previous answer, the difference between a new
ioctl
and S2API is basically the code at dtv_property_prepare_get_stats() and
dtv_property_process_get(). This is a pure code that uses a continuous struct
that will likely be at L3 cache, inside
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes:
Why do you want to pull the 1KB default mapping table out of the
device driver __init section and more it to a udev script? Now we will
have to maintain a parallel udev script for ever receiver's device
driver.
Of course no. We
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
I am a resonable guy ;) In cases when we can certainly say that there
are 2 separate remotes (and we know characteristics somehow) we need to
create 2 input devices. Otherwise we can't ;)
Only on very few specific cases (a few protocols), you can be (almost) sure.
Even
Jon Smirl wrote:
I don't like the idea of automatically loading 3 different keycodes at the
same time. You may have overlaps between different keycode tables. The
better is to have some userspace GUI that will allow the user to select
what keycode table(s) he want to be available, if he
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:30 +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
Hi Andy,
on 07 Dec 09 at 23:10, Andy Walls wrote:
[...]
(Christoph can correct me if I get anything wrong.)
Just a few additions.
Christoph,
Thanks for the corrections and additions. :)
[...]
I know that the hardware I
Linus,
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6.git
for_linus
For a series of345 patches that contain:
- new tuner driver for max2165;
- new dvb-usb driver for ec168;
- new frontend drivers for atbm8830, ds3000, ec100,
75 matches
Mail list logo
