how can deal with the stream in only on-the-fly-output available HW block??

-Original Message- From: Kim, HeungJun [mailto:riverful@samsung.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:02 PM To: 'laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com'; 'hverk...@xs4all.nl' Subject: RE: how can deal with the stream in only on-the-fly-output available HW block?? > On Monday, September

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:48:14PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > ... > >> > Ville, do you still have th

Re: Need info to understand TeVii S470 cx23885 MSI problem

Thanks. I'll try to look at this closely later in the week. Notice the byte at offset 0xac of the PCI config space: 0x91 -> 145 0x99 -> 153 I think it may be something to do with PCI bus errors and AER. I have to do more research. In the meantime you can try booting your kernel with commandl

Re: Need info to understand TeVii S470 cx23885 MSI problem

В сообщении от 13 сентября 2010 23:41:21 автор Igor M. Liplianin написал: > В сообщении от 13 сентября 2010 23:38:28 автор Igor M. Liplianin написал: > > В сообщении от 12 сентября 2010 22:56:57 автор Andy Walls написал: > > > Igor, > > > > > > To help understand the problem with the TeVii S470 CX

[PATCH 07/25] drivers/media/video/zoran: Don't use initialized char array

Just fill the array as necessary and terminate with 0 Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c b/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c index 6f846ab..b02007e 100644 --- a/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c +++ b/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran

Re: [PATCH 07/25] drivers/media: Use static const char arrays

Em 13-09-2010 16:47, Joe Perches escreveu: > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > --- > drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c |5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c > b/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c > inde

Re: Need info to understand TeVii S470 cx23885 MSI problem

В сообщении от 13 сентября 2010 23:38:28 автор Igor M. Liplianin написал: > В сообщении от 12 сентября 2010 22:56:57 автор Andy Walls написал: > > Igor, > > > > To help understand the problem with the TeVii S470 CX23885 MSI not > > working after module unload and reload, could you provide the outp

Re: Need info to understand TeVii S470 cx23885 MSI problem

В сообщении от 12 сентября 2010 22:56:57 автор Andy Walls написал: > Igor, > > To help understand the problem with the TeVii S470 CX23885 MSI not > working after module unload and reload, could you provide the output of > > # lspci -d 14f1: - - > > as root before the cx23885 module

bt878 irq PABORT

I have a DVICO Fusion 5 Lite DVB card and after switching to a new motherboard, I'm getting the following errors in my messages along with corrupted a/v output: bt878(0): irq PABORT risc_pc=3566 <...on and on...> Here's the snippit of the config from messages: Sep 12 20:02:28 baavo kernel:

[PATCH 07/25] drivers/media: Use static const char arrays

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c b/drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_device.c index 6f846ab..ea8a1e9 100644 --- a/drivers/media/video/zoran/z

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.26 and up: ERRORS

This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Mon Sep 13 19:00:13 CEST 2010 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 15148:990bbeaeb761 git master:

Re: ibmcam (xrilink_cit) and konica webcam driver porting to gspca update

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/31/2010 11:43 PM, David Ellingsworth wrote: >> >> Hans, >> >> I haven't had any success with this driver as of yet. My camera is >> shown here: http://www.amazon.com/IBM-Net-Camera-Pro-camera/dp/B0009MH25U >> The part number list

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: ... >> > Ville, do you still have the hardware to try our ati_remote2 changes? >> >> If not, I've got the hard

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

Further investigation reveals that the Traveler is likely a UVC based webcam microscope. Aveotek provides controller chips to camera manufacturers and has a generic UVC driver download available for Windows. I notice Traveler USA does not sell their microscope in the US. I believe Mattell, In

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

The cpia2 driver doesn't know about those usb ids. The Traveler microscopes look mechanically similar to the QX3 and QX5, but the pixel resolution is higher than the QX3. The QX5 has the same pxiel resolution as the Traveler Mod 1, but the Mod 2 support a higher resolution. Given all that, I'm

Re: [Query] Is there a spec to request video sensor information?

On Monday, September 13, 2010 17:27:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Aguirre, Sergio wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Sergio, > > > I was wondering if there exists a current standard way to query a > > Imaging sensor driver for knowing things like the signal vert/horz blanking > > time. > > > > In an old TI custo

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

On 09/13/2010 03:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:27 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 12-09-2010 18:28, Andy Walls escreveu: On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:12 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: And other news on the V4L1 front:

Re: Linux V4L2 support dual stream video capture device

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Wen, > > On Friday 07 May 2010 20:20:38 Wang, Wen W wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm wondering if V4L2 framework supports dual stream video capture device > > that transfer a preview stream and a regular stream (still capture or > > video capture

Re: [PATCH 5/6] Input: ati-remote2 - switch to using new keycode interface

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:40:04PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:42:05AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode > > methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by > > their scancodes but also by index.

Re: [Query] Is there a spec to request video sensor information?

Aguirre, Sergio wrote: > Hi, Hi Sergio, > I was wondering if there exists a current standard way to query a > Imaging sensor driver for knowing things like the signal vert/horz blanking > time. > > In an old TI custom driver, we used to have a private IOCTL in the sensor > Driver we interfaced

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling

On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > > It'll conflict a little bith with the tivo slide patch I posted > > > > > yesterday, > > > > > but mostly just minor context changes. I can redo that patch on top of > > > > > these changes if that's preferred. > > > > > > > > I can handle those

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

Em 13-09-2010 10:49, Andy Walls escreveu: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:45 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 13-09-2010 05:06, Hans Verkuil escreveu: >>> On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:04:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Hans, On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede

Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/2] media, mfd: Add timberdale video-in driver

Em 13-09-2010 10:39, Samuel Ortiz escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:39:42PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 02-09-2010 08:56, Richard Röjfors escreveu: >>> To follow are two patches. >>> >>> The first adds the timberdale video-in driver to the media tree. >>> >>> The s

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:45 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 13-09-2010 05:06, Hans Verkuil escreveu: > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:04:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> Hi Hans, > >> > >> On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> On 09/09/2010 03:29 PM, Hans Ver

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] mfd: Add timberdale video-in driver to timberdale

Hi Richard, On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:29:35AM +0200, Richard Röjfors wrote: > This patch defines platform data for the video-in driver > and adds it to all configurations of timberdale. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Röjfors Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology

Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/2] media, mfd: Add timberdale video-in driver

Hi Mauro, On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:39:42PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 02-09-2010 08:56, Richard Röjfors escreveu: > > To follow are two patches. > > > > The first adds the timberdale video-in driver to the media tree. > > > > The second adds it to the timberdale MFD driver. > >

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:27 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 12-09-2010 18:28, Andy Walls escreveu: > > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:12 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> > >>> And other news on the V4L1 front: > >> > >>> I'm waiting for te

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

On Monday, September 13, 2010 14:56:35 Andy Walls wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:02 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Sunday, September 12, 2010 23:12:42 Andy Walls wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > > > > And other news on the V4L1 front: > > > > > > >

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:02 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Sunday, September 12, 2010 23:12:42 Andy Walls wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > > And other news on the V4L1 front: > > > > > I'm waiting for test results on the cpia2 driver. If it works, then th

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators control

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:07 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:08:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Saturday 11 September 2010 11:03:50 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > > > > @@ -419,6 +421,8 @@ void v4l2_ctrl_fill(u32 id, const char **name, enum > > v4l2_ctr

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Monday, September 13, 2010 14:15:00 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:

Re: how can deal with the stream in only on-the-fly-output available HW block??

On Monday, September 13, 2010 14:10:55 Kim, HeungJun wrote: > Hi all, > > > > What if some SoC's specific HW block supports only on-the-fly mode for > stream output?? What do you mean with 'on-the-fly mode'? Does that mean that two HW blocks are linked together so that the video stream goes di

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200

how can deal with the stream in only on-the-fly-output available HW block??

Hi all, What if some SoC's specific HW block supports only on-the-fly mode for stream output?? In this case, what is the suitable buf_type?? I'm faced with such problem. As explanation for my situation briefly, the processor I deal with now has 3 Multimedia H/W blocks, and the problem-one in th

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > > Anyway the difference between t

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > > blocks is small. And I do

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > > "completely raw" format.

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > "completely raw" format. > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it e

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

Em 13-09-2010 05:06, Hans Verkuil escreveu: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:04:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede wrote: >>> On 09/09/2010 03:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 09/09/2010 08:55 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "Han

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Monday, September 13, 2010 12:50:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 14:10 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > There are also up to three ways the RDS data can be received/sent: either as > > RDS blocks, or using controls, or as a completely raw bitstream. The latter > > is > > u

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

Em 12-09-2010 18:28, Andy Walls escreveu: > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:12 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> >>> And other news on the V4L1 front: >> >>> I'm waiting for test results on the cpia2 driver. If it works, then the V4L1 >>> support can be

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 14:10 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > There are also up to three ways the RDS data can be received/sent: either as > RDS blocks, or using controls, or as a completely raw bitstream. The latter is > unlikely to be used for RDS output, but a cheap RDS receiver might just do >

[GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] gspca for_2.6.37

The following changes since commit 991403c594f666a2ed46297c592c60c3b9f4e1e2: V4L/DVB: cx231xx: Avoid an OOPS when card is unknown (card=0) (2010-09-11 11:58:01 -0300) are available in the git repository at: git://linuxtv.org/jfrancois/gspca.git for_2.6.37 Alexander Goncharov (1): gspc

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Documentation fixes & updates

On Saturday, September 11, 2010 17:11:05 Hans Verkuil wrote: > The following changes since commit 57fef3eb74a04716a8dd18af0ac510ec4f71bc05: > Richard Zidlicky (1): > V4L/DVB: dvb: fix smscore_getbuffer() logic > > are available in the git repository at: > > ssh://linuxtv.org/git/hverk

Re: Kernel Oops with Kernel 2.6.32

Hello, > The value for "adap" is in register RDI: 0002, and that is > not a valid pointer. There is a bug in dib7000p.c somewhere. > > Do a 'hg log -v -p linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/dib7000p.c | less' > to see what might have changed. I cannot find the reason for the Kernel Oop

Re: RFC: Replacing the 'Device Naming' section in the V4L spec

On Saturday, September 11, 2010 16:10:52 Andy Walls wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 15:49 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > I'm working on the V4L2 DocBook spec and when reading through the "Device > > Naming" > > subsection of the "Opening and Closing Devices" section in the first > > chapter I > >

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators control

On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:08:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday 11 September 2010 11:03:50 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > > @@ -419,6 +421,8 @@ void v4l2_ctrl_fill(u32 id, const char **name, enum > v4l2_ctrl_type *type, > > case V4L2_CID_AUDIO_LIMITER_ENABLED: > > ca

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:04:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 09/09/2010 03:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >> On 09/09/2010 08:55 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > >>> "Hans" == Hans Verkuil writes: > > >>> > > >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] gspca_cpia1: Restore QX3 illuminators' state on resume

Ack! Acked-by: Hans de Goede On 09/12/2010 07:45 PM, Andy Walls wrote: Turn the lights of the QX3 on (or off) as needed when resuming and at module load. Signed-off-by: Andy Walls diff -r f09faf8dd85d -r 5e576066eeaf linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/cpia1.c --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/gs

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gspca_cpia1: Disable illuminator controls if not an Intel Play QX3

Ack, Acked-by: Hans de Goede p.s. Jean-Francois, since your tree also has the needed videodev2.h changes I assume you'll take these patches in your tree and thus I won't add them to mine. Regards, Hans On 09/12/2010 07:45 PM, Andy Walls wrote: The illuminator controls should only be avail

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators control

Hi, On Saturday 11 September 2010 11:03:50 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > @@ -419,6 +421,8 @@ void v4l2_ctrl_fill(u32 id, const char **name, enum v4l2_ctrl_type *type, > case V4L2_CID_AUDIO_LIMITER_ENABLED: > case V4L2_CID_AUDIO_COMPRESSION_ENABLED: > case V4L2_CID_PILOT_TONE_ENA

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

Hi Hans, On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede wrote: > On 09/09/2010 03:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On 09/09/2010 08:55 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>> "Hans" == Hans Verkuil writes: > >>> > >>> I originally was in favor of controlling these through v4l as well, but > >>> p

Re: [GIT PATCHES FOR 2.6.37] Remove V4L1 support from the pwc driver

On Sunday, September 12, 2010 23:12:42 Andy Walls wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:26 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > And other news on the V4L1 front: > > > I'm waiting for test results on the cpia2 driver. If it works, then the V4L1 > > support can be removed from that driver as well. > > FY

Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

On Monday, September 13, 2010 08:47:24 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tuesday 07 September 2010 11:47:22 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > [snip] > > > But I can guarantee that we will get video devices with multiple leds in > > the future. > > What about devices with illumination LEDs that ca