Em Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:42:38 +0100 (CET)
Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> > > changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _
On Thursday 03 December 2009 09:04:48 Hans de Goede wrote:
> +1 for git, I really really really miss being able to do
> a simple "git rebase", and no rebase is not evil not as long
> as you don't use it for anything but local patches.
For what it's worth, I second that. "git rebase -i" is one of g
+1 for git, I really really really miss being able to do
a simple "git rebase", and no rebase is not evil not as long
as you don't use it for anything but local patches.
Regards,
Hans
On 12/01/2009 03:59 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion which ideally
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> > changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
> > with mercur
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:25:00PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> > changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
> > with
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
> with mercurial.
>
> I'm waiting for comments.
I only have one requirement:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> To start right away: I'm in favour of using GIT because of difficulties I
> have with my "daily" work with v4l-dvb. It is in my nature do to mistakes,
> so I need a tool which assists me in fixing those, I have not found a
> simple way to do my stuff w
On 12/01/2009 04:59 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
I'm waiting for comments.
GIT
I have never used Git but as it is used by main Linux kernel devel tree
I would prefer that too.
Antti
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Patrick Boettcher
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing
> the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with
> mercurial.
>
> To start right away: I'm in favour of using GIT because of dif
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:59:20PM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi all,
hi,
> I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is
> today with mercurial.
i should not be stopped by a tool i'm not familiar w
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
with mercurial.
To start right away: I'm in favour of using GIT because of difficulties I
have with my "daily" work with v4l-dvb. It is in my n
12 matches
Mail list logo
