Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thursday 03 December 2009 09:04:48 Hans de Goede wrote: +1 for git, I really really really miss being able to do a simple git rebase, and no rebase is not evil not as long as you don't use it for anything but local patches. For what it's worth, I second that. git rebase -i is one of git's

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-03 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-03 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:42:38 +0100 (CET) Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de escreveu: On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-02 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with mercurial.

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-02 Thread Hans de Goede
+1 for git, I really really really miss being able to do a simple git rebase, and no rebase is not evil not as long as you don't use it for anything but local patches. Regards, Hans On 12/01/2009 03:59 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:59:20PM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, hi, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with mercurial. i should not be stopped by a tool i'm not familiar with

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Patrick Boettcher pboettc...@kernellabs.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with mercurial. To start right away: I'm in favour of using

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 12/01/2009 04:59 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: I'm waiting for comments. GIT I have never used Git but as it is used by main Linux kernel devel tree I would prefer that too. Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Patrick Boettcher wrote: To start right away: I'm in favour of using GIT because of difficulties I have with my daily work with v4l-dvb. It is in my nature do to mistakes, so I need a tool which assists me in fixing those, I have not found a simple way to do my stuff with

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Andy Walls
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with mercurial. I'm waiting for comments. I only have one requirement:

Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

2009-12-01 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:25:00PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today with mercurial.