Hi,
On 02/24/2010 03:32 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
Where necessary libv4l currently has code snippets like:
#ifndef V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501
#define V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501 v4l2_fourcc('S','5','0','1') /* YUYV per line */
#endif
I don't think
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
The better here is to have the latest kernel headers copied on the tree.
This way, it is possible to compile libv4l2 with an older kernel version and
later upgrade the
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
I know that was mentioned then, but re-thinking this, as this will all
be Linux specific, I don't really see a need for autotools atm, and as
I personally find autotools a bit overcomplicated. I would like to try
just using plain
Hello all,
On 02/23/2010 10:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
clutter up the git tree with dead code?
[1]
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
Manu Abraham wrote:
and we've got some comments at the mailing list. Btw, the patches
I added there also adds DVB-S2 support to szap/scan, but tests
are needed, since I don't have any satellite dish nowadays.
Btw, I did spend time to review your code before it is pulled in. You
did not
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was
merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports
v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git
Manu Abraham wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
make the download/clone bigger ?
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
That's said, if all the issues are the ones listed above, I can try
to address them on the next months, to put it into a better
shape. That's said, I don't think we should have a single
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
make the download/clone bigger ?
There aren't any big advantages on merging, nor there are big advantages on
keeping
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and dougsland.
I see good, thanks! Can someone (Douglas ?) with
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
dougsland.
I see good, thanks! Can
Am Dienstag, den 23.02.2010, 13:45 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil
and dougsland.
I see
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone git://ifup.org/philips/create-v4l-utils.git
cd create-v4l-utils/
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
clutter up the git tree with dead code?
[1] http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxTV_dvb-apps
That's weird. I've
Hi,
On 01/24/2010 01:42 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is
Hi all,
On 01/21/2010 08:34 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there since the first definition.
Most apps are already in 'kernel' style. The main
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there since the first definition.
Most apps are already
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
I've different experience in the projects with git I've used, as
long as there are some governance rules (like never ever push -f,
always do a rebase fix your stuff and then push, and
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
So here is how I see v4l-utils.git being laid out based on what others
have said:
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
test/
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2010-01-19:
Yes. I personally prefer to have a bare clone (bare trees have just
the -git objects, and not a workig tree), and several working copies.
I do the work at the working copies, and, after they are fine, I push
into the bare and send the branches from bare to
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git: v4l2-apps,
possibly some firmware build code (not 100% sure of that),
Hi Hans,
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git:
v4l2-apps,
possibly some firmware build code (not 100% sure
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 09:36:08 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of
Hi,
The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
patching
uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add uvcdynctrl to libv4l
soon, as that
is
Moin Andy,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 10:54 AM, Paulo Assis wrote:
Hi,
The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
patching
uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8
Hi Devin,
I think Mauro made it quite clear that this was just an announcement for work
in progress that has been started on git support and that we still need to
discuss how we will handle backports/compatibility with older kernels, so I'll
go straight to the point I want to make.
On Tuesday
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Devin,
I totally agree with you here. We obviously don't support developers who
still
want to use a 2.4.x kernel on their computer, so a line as to be drawn at
some
point.
Currently, the backport starts on 2.6.16. I think it is ok to keep this as the
basis
Andy Walls wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 01:29 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2010-01-19:
Yes. I personally prefer to have a bare clone (bare trees have just
the -git objects, and not a workig tree), and several working copies.
I do the work at the working copies, and, after they are fine, I push
into the bare and send
Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
that we find
a way to handle the few cases where we have example applications at
the media docs.
Note that v4l2-apps also contains libv4l, it so happens that I've been
discussing moving
libv4l to
Thank you, Mauro, for doing this work! It is highly appreciated!
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
that we find
a way to handle the few cases where we have example applications at
the media docs.
Note that v4l2-apps also contains
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
preserve the log history).
I have a small script I used to convert
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
preserve the log history).
I have a small
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi,
may I humbly request to make it mandatory to enter a description
when a user creates a new tree on linuxtv.org?
IMHO foobar development repository isn't useful at all.
Ok, I changed the git-menu script to ask for the description before
creating the clone.
If
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
OTOH, since with git it is common to have multiple branches
within one repository, I'm not sure how it works. It would
be cool if git would support per-branch descriptions,
and git web could display them.
I don't think git supports it. In
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
OTOH, since with git it is common to have multiple branches
within one repository, I'm not sure how it works. It would
be cool if git would support per-branch descriptions,
and git web could display them.
I don't think git
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree
Hi Mauro,
I would like to personally thank you for spending time on git support at
linuxtv.org. Git support was a long-awaited feature for many developers (and I
certainly was one of them).
All the work done behind the scene on linuxtv.org isn't seen by end-users and
can thus be less
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 08:53:10 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
He already started doing that, fixing some incompatibility troubles
between some drivers and older kernels.
Mauro, I just wanted to thank you for doing all the hard
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled ANNOUNCE instead
of RFC. It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how the
process can be improved and soliciting feedback, you have chosen to
decide for
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi,
Due to that, I'm delegating the task of keeping -hg in sync with upstream
and backporting
patches to run on older kernels to another person: Douglas has offered his
help to keep
the tree
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mauro,
I would like to personally thank you for spending time on git support at
linuxtv.org. Git support was a long-awaited feature for many developers (and
I
certainly was one of them).
All the work done behind the scene on linuxtv.org isn't seen by
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it,
is
that one developer now can do all the work only with one clone of
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it, is
that one developer
Hi Devin,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[..]
I want to focus my development on v4l-dvb. That said, I want a stable
codebase on which I can write v4l-dvb drivers, without having to worry
about whether or not my wireless driver is screwed up this week, or
whether the ALSA guys
Patrick Boettcher wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 08:53:10 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
He already started doing that, fixing some incompatibility troubles
between some drivers and older kernels.
Mauro, I just wanted to thank you for
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled ANNOUNCE instead
of RFC. It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how the
process can be improved and soliciting feedback,
So am I. I hope the future will prove us right :-)
:)
How do your new git scripts process commits ? In particular, does the
Priority: line still applies ?
For patches imported from -hg, the script will handle Priority. For patches
generated against -git, maybe the better is to have separate
Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi Devin,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[..]
I want to focus my development on v4l-dvb. That said, I want a stable
codebase on which I can write v4l-dvb drivers, without having to worry
about whether or not my wireless driver is screwed up this
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it,
is
that one developer now can do all the
Hi Mauro,
I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and now
have trouble pushing changes:
$ git push -v uvcvideo
Pushing to git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git
fatal: The remote end hung up
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mauro,
I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and now
have trouble pushing changes:
$ git push -v uvcvideo
Pushing to
Hi Mauro,
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 14:07:39 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mauro,
I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and
now have trouble pushing
On 01/19/2010 04:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled ANNOUNCE instead
of RFC. It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how
Hi,
may I humbly request to make it mandatory to enter a description
when a user creates a new tree on linuxtv.org?
IMHO foobar development repository isn't useful at all.
If I look at http://linuxtv.org/hg/ many times I have no
clue what a repo is about or why it exists at all.
Let's not repeat
Hi Bob,
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 13:21 -0800 schrieb Bob Cunningham:
On 01/19/2010 04:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled ANNOUNCE instead
of RFC. It shows how little you care about
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5 bits/sec / 3600 sec/hr =
15.95 hours
:(
Can git resume aborted
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:38 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte /
Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5 bits/sec / 3600 sec/hr =
15.95 hours
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 02:10 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:38 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0%
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 01:29 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi,
Today, a step to the future was given, in order to help developers to better
do their work: the addition of -git support at linuxtv.org server.
This is one idea that is being recurrent along the last years: to start using
84 matches
Mail list logo
