Re: Problems with 2.6.X kernels and dosemu-1.0.2.1

2004-01-12 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, James B. Hiller wrote: Problem is that the case where new_len==0 was a security hole. Linus went one step further and also disallowed old_len==0. This is not a security hole, but deals with a somewhat tricky (and apart for source code undocumented) interface that

Problems with 2.6.X kernels and dosemu-1.0.2.1

2004-01-11 Thread James B. Hiller
Hi. Been running 1.0.2.1 for quite awhile and it's been doing great for me. Recently went into the 2.6 kernels, starting with 2.6.0. Things were fine with that one, and with the first 2.6.1 release candidate (specifically, 2.6.1-rc1-mm1). I had to go to that one to start resolving some ide cd

Re: Problems with 2.6.X kernels and dosemu-1.0.2.1

2004-01-11 Thread James B. Hiller
Hi! Thx for the fast response. On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, James B. Hiller wrote: Been running 1.0.2.1 for quite awhile and it's been doing great for me. Recently went into the 2.6 kernels, starting with 2.6.0. Things were fine with that one, and with the first 2.6.1 release candidate