ping!
Tony, there are already people who need that bug fix.
On 04/24/11 11:27, Igor Grinberg wrote:
kobject (c06a4250): tried to init an initialized object, something is
seriously wrong.
introduced by commit 66293989:
(omap: convert boards that use SMSC911x to use gpmc-smsc911x)
fixed
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:29 +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
Hi all,
These patches add support for two new panels to the generic-dpi-panel.
The first patch adds support for the Seiko 70WVW1TZ3 LCD panel, and the second
adds support for the Powertip PH480272T LCD panel.
Tested
Hi all,
These patches add support for two new panels to the generic-dpi-panel.
The first patch adds support for the Seiko 70WVW1TZ3 LCD panel, and the second
adds support for the Powertip PH480272T LCD panel.
Tested with an IGEP v2 board.
Changes since v1:
- Change the names of both panels
Add support for Seiko 70WVW1TZ3, a LCD 7.0inch WVGA (800x480) display
type with 24-bit RGB interface and Touch-Panel, to panel-generic-dpi
Tested with IGEP v2 board.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@iseebcn.com
---
drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-generic-dpi.c | 25
Add support for Powertip PH480242T, a LCD 4.3inch (480x242) display
type with 24-bit RGB interface, to panel-generic-dpi.
Tested with IGEP v2 board.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@iseebcn.com
---
drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-generic-dpi.c | 25 ++
1
* Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il [110502 23:23]:
kobject (c06a4250): tried to init an initialized object, something is
seriously wrong.
introduced by commit 66293989:
(omap: convert boards that use SMSC911x to use gpmc-smsc911x)
fixed by allocating struct platform_device
* Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il [110502 22:21]:
Yeah, sorry about that.
There's a fix at (1), I hope Tony will merge it soon.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/56499/focus=56542
Will get merged soonish.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com [110426 14:05]:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:25, Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il wrote:
replace printk(KERN_ERR by pr_err(
and fix needlessly multi-lined #ifdef
Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [110502 07:22]:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:20:52AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Oleg Drokin gr...@linuxhacker.ru [110428 09:33]:
So to me it looks like something totally in realm of musb driver itself.
Nothing bad happens if you configure your MUSB as say
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 09:07 +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
Hi all,
These patches add support for two new panels to the generic-dpi-panel.
The first patch adds support for the Seiko 70WVW1TZ3 LCD panel, and the second
adds support for the Powertip PH480272T LCD panel.
Tested with
Hi,
Most boards use exactly the same configuration for musb initialization.
Create a default that can be shared amount different boards.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* gr...@linuxhacker.ru gr...@linuxhacker.ru [110428 08:55]:
From: Oleg Drokin gr...@linuxhacker.ru
Bare-bones board file, comes with serial console, gpio keys,
MMC/SDCard and USB support.
Good to see that. Unfortunately you probably have to do few
more rebases on the devel-cleanup branch
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:22 +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
The GIC register accesses today make use of readl()/writel()
which prove to be very expensive when used along with mandatory
barriers. This mandatory barriers also introduces an un-necessary
and expensive l2x0_sync() operation. On
On 5/3/2011 3:41 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index e9c2ff8..80b3d3c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
u32 mask = 1 (d-irq % 32);
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [110502 07:18]:
* Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il [110502 06:54]:
ping?
Looks OK to me, let's wait on Felipe's comments on the
musb related stuff.
Applying this series into devel-cleanup for next merge
window.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this
* Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il [110428 00:13]:
On 04/27/11 18:58, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il [110427 02:02]:
use gpio_request_one|array() instead of multiple gpiolib
The CSIb block is used in rx-51 to handle camera ccp2 IO. Adding
support to omap3isp driver for managing the power supply for the
CSIb IO complex via regulator framework. Also create the
apropriate regulator definitions in the rx-51 board file.
I propose to push this set through the linux-media,
The RX-51 uses the CSIb IO complex for camera operation. The
board file is missing definition for the regulator supplying
the CSIb complex, so this is added for better power
management.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Jokiniemi kalle.jokini...@nokia.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c |
The current omap3isp driver is missing regulator handling
for CSIb complex in omap34xx based devices. This patch
adds a mechanism for this to the omap3isp driver.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Jokiniemi kalle.jokini...@nokia.com
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com
---
Hi Kalle,
Thanks for the patch.
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:41:23 Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
The RX-51 uses the CSIb IO complex for camera operation. The
board file is missing definition for the regulator supplying
the CSIb complex, so this is added for better power
management.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: ext Laurent Pinchart [mailto:laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com]
Sent: 3. toukokuuta 2011 13:49
To: Jokiniemi Kalle (Nokia-SD/Tampere)
Cc: mauroche...@gmail.com; t...@atomide.com; linux-
o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org
Subject:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [110428 07:06]:
This looks much better.
Acked-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
It looks like Tony hasn't taken it... Tony, are you going to handle
this patch?
I can add it into my devel-cleanup branch for next merge window
For prefetch engine, read and write got broken in commit '2c01946c'.
We never hit a scenario of not getting 'gpmc_prefetch_enable'
call success.
When reading/writing a subpage with a non divisible by 4 ecc number
of bytes, the mis-aligned bytes gets handled first before enabling
the Prefetch
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
Is there any special support needed for 3621, though?
My understanding is that's just 3630 without a phone part?
3621 is more or less a 3630 in a different package, less pins,
0.5mm ball pitch and no PoP option.
The .29 kernel they had only added
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Lesly A M lesl...@ti.com wrote:
Patch series for TWL4030 power scripts and workaround for TWL erratum 27.
Changes for implementing TWL4030 power scripts recommended by hardware team.
Introduced a new TWL4030 power script file, which can be used by different
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
MADC(Monitoring ADC) driver enables monitoring analog signals using
analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) on the input source.
The previous discussion
Hi Kalle,
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:51:56 kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
On 3. toukokuuta 2011 13:49 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:41:23 Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
The RX-51 uses the CSIb IO complex for camera operation. The
board file is missing definition for the
ping!
Just to make sure you haven't missed this one liner ;)
On 04/26/11 23:41, Igor Grinberg wrote:
WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.text+0x11014): Section mismatch
in reference from the function cm_t3517_init_usbh() to the (unknown
reference) .init.data:(unknown)
The function
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 12:54 +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On 4/21/2011 12:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Use the normal interrupt scheme for the local timers by using
a remapped PPI interrupt.
Tested on a Pandaboard.
Cc: Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com
Cc: Santosh
Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes:
2011/4/26 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com:
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110423 01:32]:
Since you'll probably be dependent on stuff happening in my patches
to move stuff into drivers/gpio I'll be happy to carry the patches in my
DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:
Kevin,
[...]
Here's an updated version of my work-in-progress GPIO cleanups.
I now understand that others have some similar work in progress, so
these are posted (to linux-omap only, for now) so that we can begin
collaboration on the
Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com writes:
Kevin,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:31, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Remove the OMAP1 #ifdef and MPUIO special case for _clear_gpio_irqbank()
The MPUIOs do not need a register access to ack/clear the IRQ status,
since reading the IRQ status
Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:32, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Make _set_gpio_wakeup() generic by removing ifdefs. Code for the
various SoCs/bank-methods was already the same, except for the
non-wakeup GPIO checking. But that flag is set on a
Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com writes:
Kevin,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:32, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Remove cpu_is_* checks from gpio_show_revision() by passing in the
revision address offset from platform data. SoCs with no revision
register (15xx, 7xx, and all MPUIOs)
Hi guys,
I'm thinking probably in a crazy idea, I hope someone can help me or
kill definitely this idea from my mind.
I'll explain a little more, the real problem is I don't know how to
add support for an expansion board for IGEP v2 board. I see most of
boards adds the support inside the
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:47:25PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:48:41AM -0700, Sutharsan wrote:
From Sutharsan Ramamoorthy s...@cypress.com
This patch replaces custom debug macros with Linux kernel's pr_...() macros.
Why not use the dev_dbg() and other macros instead
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:22 +0530, Mayuresh Janorkar wrote:
From: Mythri P K mythr...@ti.com
A projector panel named picodlp is supported by OMAP.
panel driver is required to be added with the name picodlp_panel.
It is a WVGA panel with resolution 864 X 480 and panel timing data
is
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:22 +0530, Mayuresh Janorkar wrote:
picodlp is a TI projector panel supported by OMAP
picodlp makes use of i2c interface for transferring commands to the panel
panel data is required for identifying i2c_adapter id and dlp GPIOs
A new header file has been added for
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:22 +0530, Mayuresh Janorkar wrote:
The configurations and data transfer with picodlp panel happens through i2c.
An i2c client with name picodlp_i2c_driver is registered inside panel.
dpp2600 requires 4 gpio lines for interfacing it with any processor,
phy_reset,
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:22 +0530, Mayuresh Janorkar wrote:
From: Mythri P K mythr...@ti.com
picodlp_i2c_client needs to send commands over i2c as a part of
initialiazation.
system controller dlp pico processor dpp2600 is used.
It configures the splash screen of picodlp using a sequence of
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:22 +0530, Mayuresh Janorkar wrote:
picodlp projector is supported by OMAP.
OMAP4430 SDP and EVM boards have an on board projector called as picodlp
projector.
picodlp would be connected to display sub system as a display panel.
It has a dlp processor dpp2600.
The
Hello Steve,
Can you try adding this patch?
Regards,
Keerthy
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
MADC(Monitoring
2011/5/3 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com:
Are you OK with a move of the current OMAP GPIO drivers (rather ugly)
into drivers/gpio first, followed by the cleanup/restructure patches?
In my case I actually did some cleanup after moving the driver for
U300, but I think this is a question to the GPIO
Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com writes:
Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com writes:
Kevin,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:32, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Remove cpu_is_* checks from gpio_show_revision() by passing in the
revision address offset from platform data. SoCs with no revision
Hello!
This patch breaks compile for me.
On Apr 24, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common-board-devices.c
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+void __init omap_ads7846_init(int bus_num, int gpio_pendown, int
gpio_debounce,
+ struct
Hello!
This patch breaks compile for me:
On Apr 24, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common-board-devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common-board-devices.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
...
+void __init omap_nand_flash_init(int options, struct mtd_partition *parts,
Ok, so here's a simple patch to save everyone trouble, I guess.
Though on the other hand I can imagine that perhaps including this generic
common-board-devices.c
might not be desirable for people that don't use anything from that file.
Would it be a better idea to split it to a file-per-feature?
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:49 PM, J, KEERTHY j-keer...@ti.com wrote:
Hello Steve,
Can you try adding this patch?
Thanks!
I tried the patch and it did indeed fix the issue. We should try to
get this in mainline since the hwmon driver won't work without it.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:49 PM, J, KEERTHY j-keer...@ti.com wrote:
Hello Steve,
Can you try adding this patch?
Thanks!
I tried the patch and it did indeed fix the issue. We should try to
get this in mainline since
49 matches
Mail list logo
