On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:31:31AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:21:33AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
The regulator-name property is used to populate constrains-name. Are
you sure you still want them all removed?
Yes, of course. There's no way that a generic .dtsi used
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:21:33AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:26:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi
I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the
regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're
Hi Mark,
arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi
I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the
regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're fairly
useless and seem to be missing the point of having the property.
Just looking at this now.
The
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:26:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi
I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the
regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're fairly
useless and seem to be missing the point of having the
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 17:08:06, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:27:36AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 15:29:36, Mark Brown wrote:
Every regulator here has a rather large voltage range specified with no
consumers added. Are you sure these
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:36:48, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 17:08:06, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:27:36AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 15:29:36, Mark Brown wrote:
Every regulator here has a rather large voltage range
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:23:50PM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
By the way, if we look at all the regulator added (DT supported) till now have
the similar problem.
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
This is fine - the SoC contains integrated regulators which supply other
bits of the Soc so we
On 23/07/12 14:34, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:23:50PM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
By the way, if we look at all the regulator added (DT supported) till now have
the similar problem.
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
This is fine - the SoC contains integrated regulators
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:16:26PM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
+ vio_reg: regulator@1 {
+ reg = 1;
+ regulator-compatible = vio;
+ regulator-min-microvolt = 150;
+ regulator-max-microvolt =
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 15:29:36, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:16:26PM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
+ vio_reg: regulator@1 {
+ reg = 1;
+ regulator-compatible = vio;
+
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:27:36AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 15:29:36, Mark Brown wrote:
Every regulator here has a rather large voltage range specified with no
consumers added. Are you sure these voltage ranges make sense in your
design and you've not just
11 matches
Mail list logo
