Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:53:43PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > Besides, the MUSB code hasn't really changed that much in this time. Even if that was true (which, according to Felippe's answer isn't), the USB subsystem itself has changed quite a bit since. > Do you really think the problem will

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:02:27PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > It would be nice if everyone were to migrate to the latest code, but does that > really take away the fun of solving a problem? I agree we shouldn't try to > fix something > that, in all likelyhood, has already been fixed. But is it

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:55:03PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > Okay. That comparison wasn't warranted, I guess. But here's what went through > my mind when I read Felipe's post. "If you want this to work, then upgrade". > And > that looked exactly like MS telling me "I can't help you with XP an

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:56 +0530, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > > > Grr. Saying one needs to upgrade to the latest kernel before one can > > > expect > > > support is a bit like certain proprietary OS vendors - and even they do a > > > better > > > job than this. > > The difference is that an

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:53:43PM +0530, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > Grr. Saying one needs to upgrade to the latest kernel before one can expect > > support is a bit like certain proprietary OS vendors - and even they do a > > better > > job than this. > > If you want to support people runnin

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:56 +0530, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > Grr. Saying one needs to upgrade to the latest kernel before one can expect > > support is a bit like certain proprietary OS vendors - and even they do a > > better > > job than this. The difference is that an OS vendor usually sel

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:56:48PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > That's plain wrong. 2.6.22 was released in July 2007. But 2.6.22.18 was not. > > That came much later - in February this year. And people still do use 2.6.22 > > kernels. Besides, the MUSB code hasn't really changed that much in th

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:53:43PM +0530, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > Grr. Saying one needs to upgrade to the latest kernel before one can expect > support is a bit like certain proprietary OS vendors - and even they do a > better > job than this. If you want to support people running 2.6.22, goo

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote: >> > >> > Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in >> > the 2.6.2X >> series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Besides it comes along >> with few >> distros as default kernel. >> > >> >

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > > > > Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in > > the 2.6.2X > series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Besides it comes along with > few > distros as default kernel. > > > > A lot of

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > > Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in the > 2.6.2X series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Besides it comes > along with few distros as default kernel. > > A lot of people like m

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in the > 2.6.2X series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Actually, it can, as it was released quite a long time ago. > Besides it comes along with

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Emanoil Kotsev
Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in the 2.6.2X series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Besides it comes along with few distros as default kernel. A lot of people like me need some kind of a stable version that we can relay on for more than playing

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:28:35PM +0530, ext Dasgupta, Romit wrote: > What is the application you are using and could you turn the musb driver > debug options? You can try it by > > echo "D 3" > /proc/driver/musb_hdrc (Check if MUSB_DEBUG is enabled). it's D3, together :-) > > This should g

RE: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Dasgupta, Romit
What is the application you are using and could you turn the musb driver debug options? You can try it by echo "D 3" > /proc/driver/musb_hdrc (Check if MUSB_DEBUG is enabled). This should give more helpful messages. >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-ope

Re: USB driver issue

2008-07-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:59 PM, SUBHRANIL CHOUDHURY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to validate the USB driver on OMAP3430 with the > 2.6.22.18kernel. I am facing problems in the process while trying to > do a USB > transfer with DMA enabled. > The apllication is breaking i

[PATCH] PM related changes:McSPI

2008-07-30 Thread Girish. S. G.
PM related changes for McSPI Signed-off-by: Girish S G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 26 - drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c | 195 ++ 2 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) Index: linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap