Re: [PATCH] omap2+: add drm device

2012-05-23 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:08 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: >> Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device.  DMM is split into a >> separate device using hwmod. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross > > > >> +static int __init omap_init_drm(void) >>

Re: [PATCH] omap2+: add drm device

2012-05-23 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:08 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device. DMM is split into a > separate device using hwmod. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Gross > +static int __init omap_init_drm(void) > +{ > + struct omap_hwmod *oh = NULL; > + struct platform_devic

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] arm: omap4panda: Add support for omap4iss camera

2012-05-23 Thread Sergio Aguirre
Hi Tony, On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sergio Aguirre [120502 08:21]: >> This adds support for camera interface with the support for >> following sensors: >> >> - OV5640 >> - OV5650 > > It seems that at this point we should initialize new things like this > with DT onl

Re: MFD USB host: prevents CORE retention in idle

2012-05-23 Thread Kevin Hilman
On 05/23/2012 05:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Hi Keshava, Using current l-o master, I noticed that CORE was not hitting retention in idle on my 3530/Overo. CORE hits retention on suspend just fine. Debugging this, I found that usbtll_fck was still enabled during idle, thus preventing CORE from h

MFD USB host: prevents CORE retention in idle

2012-05-23 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Keshava, Using current l-o master, I noticed that CORE was not hitting retention in idle on my 3530/Overo. CORE hits retention on suspend just fine. Debugging this, I found that usbtll_fck was still enabled during idle, thus preventing CORE from hitting retention. To test, I disabled USB hos

Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup

2012-05-23 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Govindraj.R" writes: > From: "Govindraj.R" > > The commit (bce492c0 ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of > default uart pads) removed default uart pads that where getting populated > and which was making rx pin wakeup capable. If uart pads were used in > different mode by any other m

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

2012-05-23 Thread Omar Ramirez Luna
Hi Tony, Benoit, On 1 May 2012 12:47, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. > > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. > > Omar Ramirez Luna (2): >  OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support >  arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes > >  .../devicetree/bind

[PATCH] omap2+: add drm device

2012-05-23 Thread Andy Gross
Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device. DMM is split into a separate device using hwmod. Signed-off-by: Andy Gross --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |4 ++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/drm.c | 61 drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h |2 +

Re: rx51: support for lis3lv02d accelerometer

2012-05-23 Thread Pali Rohár
On Monday 21 May 2012 09:08:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi Pali, > > * Tony Lindgren [120508 17:12]: > > * Pali Rohár [120504 08:41]: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Upstream linux kernel has already driver for lis3lv02d > > > accelerometer in drivers/misc/lis3lv02d. So now can be > > > added also platform s

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2012-05-23 Thread David Brown
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:47:17PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > + xyzreg: regulator@0 { > + regulator-min-microvolt = <100>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <250>; > + regulator-always-on; > + vin-supply = <&vin>; > + }; Just noticed

RE: [PATCH-V3 3/3] ARM: OMAP3+: clock33xx: Add AM33XX clock tree data

2012-05-23 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 20:38:27, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Vaibhav > > On Wed, 23 May 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > > I used your cleaned version of clocktree data, where you have removed all > > leaf-nodes and merged multiple clocks nodes into one; but it did not work. > > I > > attempt

RE: [PATCH-V3 3/3] ARM: OMAP3+: clock33xx: Add AM33XX clock tree data

2012-05-23 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi Vaibhav On Wed, 23 May 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > I used your cleaned version of clocktree data, where you have removed all > leaf-nodes and merged multiple clocks nodes into one; but it did not work. I > attempted to review the cleanup and tried to debug, but found it bit hard to > c

Re: [PATCH v4-alt 3/6] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: add gpmc

2012-05-23 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Walmsley [120521 23:51]: > > > > Next, I'd suggest implementing the code to allow GPMC timing configuration > > from raw register data (the second method above). This is hackish but for > > some boards, this is all we'll have. This will also

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH V3 00/10] PM: Create the AVS(Adaptive Voltage Scaling)

2012-05-23 Thread Menon, Nishanth
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Woodruff, Richard" writes: > >>> From: Hilman, Kevin >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:17 PM >> >>> A basic OMAP AVS driver has been in mainline for a long time, yet we >>> have not seen support submitted for all of these features. >> >> 1.5/

Re: [PATCH 1/7] remoteproc: resource table overhaul

2012-05-23 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
Hi Ludovic, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:51 PM, frq09524 wrote: > In my previous patch, to find the correct subdevice that match with physical > memory, I used pa member of rproc_mem_entry. I'm not sure we want to find these subdevices using the physical memory of the expected region. Doing so me

RE: [PATCH-V3 3/3] ARM: OMAP3+: clock33xx: Add AM33XX clock tree data

2012-05-23 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 21:06:43, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > > Please take care of changing the hwmod main_clk as well. But maybe > > that's not part of that series. > > It's not part of the series yet. > > Vaibhav, could you take care of changing the

Re: [PATCH] iommu/core: pass a user-provided token to fault handlers

2012-05-23 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:20:05PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Sometimes a single IOMMU user may have to deal with several > different IOMMU devices (e.g. remoteproc). > > When an IOMMU fault happens, such users have to regain their > context in order to deal with the fault. > > Users can't us