On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
2) If I do, will it still broken unless I apply the "2.2.16combo" patch?
3) If it will, then how do I resolve the problem with the md.c hunk failing
with "2.2.16combo"?
If I remember correctly, 2.2.16combo was there to make it possible to use
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Corin Hartland-Swann wrote:
I have to confess I've never heard of manufacturers offering diagnostic
utilities for disks... Gregory, can you point me at any examples? Am I
just being a complete dumbass here?
At least Western Digital does on their ftp address
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Art wrote:
After pulling out one disk (system off line), it came back on line with the
data intact... It started automatically the reconfiguration using the spare
disk.
The funny thing was, after reinserting the original disk it did not
reconfigure it automatially. I
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
If raid on 2.4 is fast than raid in 2.2, we say "great".
If it is slower, we look at the no-raid numbers.
If no-raid on 2.4 is slow than no-raid on 2.2, we say "oh dear, the
disc subsystem is slower on 2.4", and point the finger appropriately.
If
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Hermann 'mrq1' Gausterer wrote:
but when i do mkraid, i get an error :-(((
[root@mrqserv2 linux]# mkraid /dev/md0
handling MD device /dev/md0
analyzing super-block
disk 0: /dev/sdb1, 4233096kB, raid superblock at 4233024kB
disk 1: /dev/sdc1, 4233096kB, raid
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Dirk Bonenkamp - Bean IT wrote:
I want to upgrade a machine running 2.2.10 kernel running software raid to
2.2.16. I only found raid patches ending with 2.2.11 (ftp.fi.kernel.org),
will this work on 2.2.16?? And, is patching and installing the new kernel
enough to get
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
If you don't have raidsetfaulty (so RedHats don't have it), grab the
latest raidtools from
http://www.{country}.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz
I think you can get more recent raidtools from
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Matthew DeFoor wrote:
now!
sdb6's event counter: 0006
sda6's event counter: 0006
request_module[md-personality-3]: Root fs not mounted
Seems to me you have raid1 compiled as a module. That's OK if you really
know initrd stuff, but personally I prefer to compile
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Maria Blackmore wrote:
In a nutshell, it simply doesn't work, there isn't much more I can say
than that, because that is just it.
In a nutshell, get the patches (http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/),
compile the kernel and off you go.
needless to say, niether the
Today, I had another SCSI failure. I was able to get a bit more of dmesg
stuff, but can't figure out, what is going wrong there.
In /var/log/messages, the unusuall stuff starts with this repeated a
couple of times:
Mar 28 12:00:45 mail kernel: (scsi0:0:2:0) Parity error during Message-In phase
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Mike Bilow wrote:
That's a hardware problem. A SCSI parity error is reported by the
hardware and simply passed up the chain. Unless there is something
seriously wrong in the aic7xxx sequencer code, which I doubt, this looks
like a typical cabling and termination issue.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Douglas Egan wrote:
When this happened to me I had to "raidhotadd" to get it back in the
list. What does your /proc/mdstat indicate?
Try:
raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sde7
I *think* you should 'raidhotremove' the failed disk-partition first, then
you can 'raidhotadd'
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Clinton Bittel wrote:
I tried patching
ide_2_2_14_2124_patch.gz
raid-2_2.14-B1.gz
And still cannot find a mention of the Ultra 66 or 33
when I go to recompile the kernel. Is it already
built in??
ide_2_2_14_2124 takes care of ATA-66 drivers. They are not
?
Thanks, Danilo
__
|Danilo Godec|Agenda d.o.o.| ISP for business |
| jr. Syst. Admin | Gosposvetska 84 | WAN networks|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | si-2000 Maribor | Internet/Intranet |
| tel
or
removal?
Thanks, D.
__
| Danilo Godec|Agenda d.o.o.| ISP for business |
| jr. Syst. Admin | Gosposvetska 84 | WAN networks|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | si-2000 Maribor | Internet/Intrane
array (for testing only) and it's looking
good.
Thanks, D.
__
|Danilo Godec|Agenda d.o.o.| ISP for business |
| jr. Syst. Admin | Gosposvetska 84 | WAN networks|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | si
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, David Cooley wrote:
Here's what I get when patching against a fresh 2.2.13-1.3.0 kernel source
Where'd you get your source?
I downloaded mine from ftp.kernel.org and it's 2.2.14-1.3.0
What is this '-1.3.0'? I don't think this is plain kernel source...
If I go to
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Standardaccount wrote:
How can I get raid running?
BTW: I've tried to apply the kernel-patch for the 2.2.11 kernel, but
patch won't work. Is there any need for the kernel- patch and where can
I get it for the 2.2.13 kernel?
You need to apply the 2.2.11 patch to 2.2.13
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Edward Schernau wrote:
I am running 2.2.13, whose config script has options for RAID. I have
raidtools-0.90. Why/Do I need to patch? Pointers appreciated.
You have to patch because plain 2.2.13 kernel has an 'old style' raid,
while raidtools-0.90 are designed for 'new
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Randy Winch wrote:
Retested with with mem=256M:
I usually use mem=12M and boot into single mode, so that memory really has
almost no influence.
bonnie
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block---
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Jakob Sandgren wrote:
No, actually i did not. I read the FAQ and according to it should it
be ok to start with mke2fs _before_ the sync/(re)build was finished.
Anyone else who could confirm that this should be a problem?
A few days ago a bug - that could cause that - was
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Zach Coombes wrote:
- the Ultra66 isn't supported yet. I'm running a 2.3.XX beta (yes I
take digitalis regularly) as recent 2.2 kernels didn't even register
the Ultra66 controllers' existence. Are the Ultra66 patches to the
kernel nearing a state where we'll see
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, ACEAlex wrote:
the 2.2.13 kernel with is the latest stable. But when i try to start using
it i get a different startup screens (see belove). Do i have to patch the
kernel before i use raidtools. Cause i get errors when trying to execute
Yes. The RedHat kernel includes the
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Terry Ewing wrote:
I also manually used cp to copy about 10 or 12 of the corrupted files from
the original tree to the RAID filesystem. After this, the files that I
copied did not differ from the originals. It seems that files become
corrupted under a heavy load
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, David Cunningham wrote:
I've seen a lot of recommendations for obtaining the 2.2.13ac kernel. So
far I've found nothing listed with the ac suffix. What is this ac?
These are Alan Cox's patches located on kernel.org mirrors in
/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/ directory.
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Dong Hu wrote:
Now I want to change the configuration to raid0,
so I edit the /etc/raidtab file,
issue mkraid --force /dev/md0,
I suppose you did stop the raid device ('raidstop /dev/md0') first? Then I
think you should use --really-force (this is not in the
Hi!
Can I use partitions on software raid device (/dev/md0, raid-5 in my
case)?
Using 2.2.13 with raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 patch and raidtools-0.90.
Thanks, D.
Hi!
I'm new to this list and have some questions. However I'd like to first
browse through the list archive if it's available somewhere.
Is it? :)
Thanks, D.
Hi!
Ok, found an archive, but haven't found the questions/answers I was hoping
to find.
I have a RAID1 setup with kernel 2.2.13 and appropriate patches for 2.2.11
(only two files didn't patch correctly, as they were already patched in
2.2.13) and raidtools-0.90. Everything works nice, even
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, [iso-8859-1] Jakob stergaard wrote:
It should be fairly simple to grep for underscores in /proc/mdstat using
cron+{perl,grep,whatever} and send a mail if one is found.
When a disk dies it is marked in /proc/mdstat like [UU_U].
Thanks, I think I will do that.
Now for
30 matches
Mail list logo
