Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support

2018-10-12 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:30:02AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On 2018-10-11 09:02:22 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Niklas,
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:11 AM Niklas Söderlund
> >  wrote:
> > > On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > > Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> > 
> > > > --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > > > +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > > > @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
> > > >   #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > > >   };
> > > >
> > > > + tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
> > > > + compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
> > > > + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
> > > > +   <0 0xe61a 0 0x100>;
> > > > + interrupts = ,
> > > > +  ,
> > > > +  ;
> > > > + clocks = < CPG_MOD 522>;
> > > > + power-domains = < R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> > > > + resets = < 522>;
> > > > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > >
> > > The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not
> > > matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it
> > > consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi
> > > files. In any case with or without the status property.
> > 
> > Forgot to review commit c79661eb5060e2bf ("arm64: dts: renesas: Remove
> > unneeded status from thermal nodes")? ;-)
> 
> Not only that also reviewing using the context from v4.19-rc1 which of 
> course is not correct for dtsi patches, thanks for enlightening me :-)

Thanks everyone, applied or v4.21.


Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support

2018-10-11 Thread Niklas Söderlund
Hi Geert,

On 2018-10-11 09:02:22 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:11 AM Niklas Söderlund
>  wrote:
> > On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> 
> > > --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > > +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > > @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
> > >   #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > >   };
> > >
> > > + tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
> > > + compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
> > > + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
> > > +   <0 0xe61a 0 0x100>;
> > > + interrupts = ,
> > > +  ,
> > > +  ;
> > > + clocks = < CPG_MOD 522>;
> > > + power-domains = < R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> > > + resets = < 522>;
> > > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> >
> > The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not
> > matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it
> > consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi
> > files. In any case with or without the status property.
> 
> Forgot to review commit c79661eb5060e2bf ("arm64: dts: renesas: Remove
> unneeded status from thermal nodes")? ;-)

Not only that also reviewing using the context from v4.19-rc1 which of 
course is not correct for dtsi patches, thanks for enlightening me :-)

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund


Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support

2018-10-11 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Niklas,

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:11 AM Niklas Söderlund
 wrote:
> On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

> > --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
> >   #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >   };
> >
> > + tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
> > + compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
> > + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
> > +   <0 0xe61a 0 0x100>;
> > + interrupts = ,
> > +  ,
> > +  ;
> > + clocks = < CPG_MOD 522>;
> > + power-domains = < R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> > + resets = < 522>;
> > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>
> The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not
> matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it
> consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi
> files. In any case with or without the status property.

Forgot to review commit c79661eb5060e2bf ("arm64: dts: renesas: Remove
unneeded status from thermal nodes")? ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support

2018-10-10 Thread Niklas Söderlund
Hi Sergei,

Thanks for keep working on this patch.

On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> 
> ---
> This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20181008-v4.19-rc7' tag of Simon
> Horman's 'renesas.git' repo.
> 
> Changes in version 2:
> - renamed the thermal device node label;
> - renamed the thermal zone nodes;
> - added the passive trip point in the 1st thermal zone and the passive and
>   critical trip points in the 2nd thermal zone;
> - changed the "hysteresis" prop in the critical trip point;
> - removed the empty "cooling-maps" node from the 1st thermal zone.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi |   53 
> ++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> ===
> --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
>   #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>   };
>  
> + tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
> + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
> +   <0 0xe61a 0 0x100>;
> + interrupts = ,
> +  ,
> +  ;
> + clocks = < CPG_MOD 522>;
> + power-domains = < R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> + resets = < 522>;
> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;

The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not 
matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it 
consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi 
files. In any case with or without the status property.

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund 

> + };
> +
>   intc_ex: interrupt-controller@e61c {
>   compatible = "renesas,intc-ex-r8a77980", "renesas,irqc";
>   #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> @@ -1404,6 +1417,46 @@
>   };
>   };
>  
> + thermal-zones {
> + thermal-sensor-1 {
> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> + polling-delay = <1000>;
> + thermal-sensors = < 0>;
> +
> + trips {
> + sensor1-passive {
> + temperature = <95000>;
> + hysteresis = <1000>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> + sensor1-critical {
> + temperature = <12>;
> + hysteresis = <1000>;
> + type = "critical";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + thermal-sensor-2 {
> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> + polling-delay = <1000>;
> + thermal-sensors = < 1>;
> +
> + trips {
> + sensor2-passive {
> + temperature = <95000>;
> + hysteresis = <1000>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> + sensor2-critical {
> + temperature = <12>;
> + hysteresis = <1000>;
> + type = "critical";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
>   timer {
>   compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>   interrupts-extended = < GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund


[PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support

2018-10-10 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

---
This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20181008-v4.19-rc7' tag of Simon
Horman's 'renesas.git' repo.

Changes in version 2:
- renamed the thermal device node label;
- renamed the thermal zone nodes;
- added the passive trip point in the 1st thermal zone and the passive and
  critical trip points in the 2nd thermal zone;
- changed the "hysteresis" prop in the critical trip point;
- removed the empty "cooling-maps" node from the 1st thermal zone.

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi |   53 ++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

Index: renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
===
--- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
+++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
@@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
#power-domain-cells = <1>;
};
 
+   tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
+   compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
+   reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
+ <0 0xe61a 0 0x100>;
+   interrupts = ,
+,
+;
+   clocks = < CPG_MOD 522>;
+   power-domains = < R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
+   resets = < 522>;
+   #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
+   };
+
intc_ex: interrupt-controller@e61c {
compatible = "renesas,intc-ex-r8a77980", "renesas,irqc";
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
@@ -1404,6 +1417,46 @@
};
};
 
+   thermal-zones {
+   thermal-sensor-1 {
+   polling-delay-passive = <250>;
+   polling-delay = <1000>;
+   thermal-sensors = < 0>;
+
+   trips {
+   sensor1-passive {
+   temperature = <95000>;
+   hysteresis = <1000>;
+   type = "passive";
+   };
+   sensor1-critical {
+   temperature = <12>;
+   hysteresis = <1000>;
+   type = "critical";
+   };
+   };
+   };
+
+   thermal-sensor-2 {
+   polling-delay-passive = <250>;
+   polling-delay = <1000>;
+   thermal-sensors = < 1>;
+
+   trips {
+   sensor2-passive {
+   temperature = <95000>;
+   hysteresis = <1000>;
+   type = "passive";
+   };
+   sensor2-critical {
+   temperature = <12>;
+   hysteresis = <1000>;
+   type = "critical";
+   };
+   };
+   };
+   };
+
timer {
compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
interrupts-extended = < GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |