Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hell Krzysztof, On 11/22/2014 11:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: By bisecting I found that the commit introducing both regressions is: ae43b32 (ARM: 8202/1: dmaengine: pl330: Add runtime Power Management support v12) By reverting ae43b32, next-20141121 boots with both

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
On 11/24/2014 10:38 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hell Krzysztof An unfortunate typo, this was Hello of course :-) Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On pią, 2014-11-21 at 21:49 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hello Kevin, On 11/21/2014 05:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: So, I see two different boot failures on the Peach Pi[t] Chromebooks: 1) next20141121 boot fails due snd-soc-snow Disabling CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW makes the boot

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-24 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Ajay, On 11/21/2014 09:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: On 11/21/2014 06:32 PM, Ajay kumar wrote: Hi, I have rebased my bridge series on top of linux-next. This is my git log: 4b38a6f Revert Revert ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support 6fb39a7 ARM:

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On pon, 2014-11-24 at 10:38 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hell Krzysztof, On 11/22/2014 11:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: By bisecting I found that the commit introducing both regressions is: ae43b32 (ARM: 8202/1: dmaengine: pl330: Add runtime Power Management support

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Krzysztof, On 11/24/2014 11:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: Ok, please let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks! I replied before seeing your response. Anyway the dmatests are the same I got on Arndale Octa. It seems that mau_epll has to be enabled... or something is

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On pon, 2014-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hello Krzysztof, On 11/24/2014 11:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: Ok, please let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks! I replied before seeing your response. Anyway the dmatests are the same I got on

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
[adding Tushar Behera and Doug Anderson to cc list] Hello, On 11/24/2014 12:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On pon, 2014-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hello Krzysztof, It seems that mau_epll has to be enabled... or something is wrong with clock hierarchy.

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Vivek Gautam
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote: [adding Tushar Behera and Doug Anderson to cc list] Hello, On 11/24/2014 12:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On pon, 2014-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hello Krzysztof,

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On pon, 2014-11-24 at 14:16 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [adding Tushar Behera and Doug Anderson to cc list] Hello, On 11/24/2014 12:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On pon, 2014-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: Hello Krzysztof, It seems that

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-24 Thread Ajay kumar
Hi Andreas, On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Hi, Am 24.11.2014 um 11:05 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: On 11/21/2014 09:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: On 11/21/2014 06:32 PM, Ajay kumar wrote: I have rebased my bridge series on top of

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-22 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
W dniu 21.11.2014 o 21:49, Javier Martinez Canillas pisze: Hello Kevin, On 11/21/2014 05:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: So, I see two different boot failures on the Peach Pi[t] Chromebooks: 1) next20141121 boot fails due snd-soc-snow Disabling CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW makes the boot to got a little

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Inki, On 11/20/2014 06:01 PM, Inki Dae wrote: Ah, sorry. There was my misunderstanding. drm-next already is merged to linux-next so I think we can do the integration test if exynos-drm-next is merged to drm-next earlier. Anyway, I will try to consider your opinion. Cool, having

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-21 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 21.11.2014 um 00:49 schrieb Paolo Pisati: vanilla kgene/for-next as of today: 7552917 Revert ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support ff0391a Merge branch 'v3.19-samsung-defconfig' into for-next 26c6283 Merge branch 'v3.18-samsung-fixes' into for-next cf864fd

Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
[adding Kukjin as cc and dropping dri-devel] Hello Kevin, On 11/20/2014 07:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: My kernel command line is almost the same with the difference that I'm using clk_ignore_unused and I just checked that not passing that parameter, makes linux-next to hang showing the same

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-21 Thread Kevin Hilman
Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: [adding Kukjin as cc and dropping dri-devel] Hello Kevin, On 11/20/2014 07:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: My kernel command line is almost the same with the difference that I'm using clk_ignore_unused and I just checked that not

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-21 Thread Ajay kumar
Hi, I have rebased my bridge series on top of linux-next. This is my git log: 4b38a6f Revert Revert ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support 6fb39a7 ARM: dts: peach-pit: represent the connection between bridge and panel using videoport and endpoints aee649c ARM: dts: snow:

Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)

2014-11-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Kevin, On 11/21/2014 05:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: So, I see two different boot failures on the Peach Pi[t] Chromebooks: 1) next20141121 boot fails due snd-soc-snow Disabling CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW makes the boot to got a little further but still fails with the second issue: 2)

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Ajay, On 11/21/2014 06:32 PM, Ajay kumar wrote: Hi, I have rebased my bridge series on top of linux-next. This is my git log: 4b38a6f Revert Revert ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support 6fb39a7 ARM: dts: peach-pit: represent the connection between bridge

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Vivek, On 11/20/2014 08:51 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: I tested linux-next on Exynos5800 peach-pi board with linux-next and and the two patches $Subject and [0]. Below is my git hash: 4d9e6ee drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init 4545ed4 POSTED: arm: dts:

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Javier, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Hello Vivek, On 11/20/2014 08:51 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: I tested linux-next on Exynos5800 peach-pi board with linux-next and and the two patches $Subject and [0]. Below is my

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Javier, On 2014년 11월 18일 22:53, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: The Exynos DRM driver register its sub-devices platform drivers in the probe function but after commit 43c0767 (of/platform: Move platform devices under /sys/devices/platform), this is causing a deadlock in __driver_attach().

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Pankaj Dubey
On 20 November 2014 15:22, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Javier, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Hello Vivek, On 11/20/2014 08:51 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: I tested linux-next on Exynos5800 peach-pi board

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Inki, On 11/20/2014 03:07 PM, Inki Dae wrote: Could you re-base this patch on top of exynos-drm-next? I tried to separate sub drivers into independent drivers but it seems that we need more times. So I will merge your patch. Sure, I'll rebase on top of exynos-drm-next and re-post so

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Inki, On 11/20/2014 04:06 PM, Inki Dae wrote: BTW, it would be great if exynos-drm-next is pulled in linux-next. That is what most people use to test integration issues so you can catch earlier any regression that may arise. You have to email Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au and

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Paolo Pisati
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:22:23PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: On linux-samsung tree the only patch that's missing apart from dptx-phy patches is the syscon patch from Pankaj Dubey: b784b98 mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from platform devices So with below git hash,

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Vivek, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com writes: [...] I tested linux-next on Exynos5800 peach-pi board with linux-next and and the two patches $Subject and [0]. Below is my git hash: 4d9e6ee drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init 4545ed4 POSTED: arm: dts:

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Paolo, On 11/20/2014 04:57 PM, Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:22:23PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: On linux-samsung tree the only patch that's missing apart from dptx-phy patches is the syscon patch from Pankaj Dubey: b784b98 mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Inki Dae
2014-11-21 0:26 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk: Hello Inki, On 11/20/2014 04:06 PM, Inki Dae wrote: BTW, it would be great if exynos-drm-next is pulled in linux-next. That is what most people use to test integration issues so you can catch earlier any

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello, For completeness I'll comment what we talked with Kevin on IRC since probably this is the same issue that Paolo is facing. On 11/20/2014 05:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Peach # setenv preboot usb start; sleep 1setenv bootargs console=tty1 console=ttySAC3,115200 debug earlyprintk rw

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Kevin Hilman
Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: Hello, For completeness I'll comment what we talked with Kevin on IRC since probably this is the same issue that Paolo is facing. On 11/20/2014 05:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Peach # setenv preboot usb start; sleep 1setenv

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-20 Thread Paolo Pisati
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:22:54AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: Hello, For completeness I'll comment what we talked with Kevin on IRC since probably this is the same issue that Paolo is facing. On 11/20/2014 05:41 PM,

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Kevin, On 11/18/2014 11:46 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Is anyone at Samsung testing linux-next? If so, on what platforms? It would really be nice if your linux-next work was tested on these publically-available 542x/5800 platforms (peach-pi, peach-pit, odroid-xu3) which would also allow

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
[adding Paolo and Vivek as cc] Hello, On 11/18/2014 07:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: It fixes the DRM deadlock, issue for me on exynos5800-peach-pi, but then it proceeds to panic in the workqueue code called by the asoc max98090 codec[1]. If I then disable CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW, I can get it

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: [adding Paolo and Vivek as cc] Hello, On 11/18/2014 07:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: It fixes the DRM deadlock, issue for me on exynos5800-peach-pi, but then it proceeds to panic in the workqueue code called by the asoc

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org writes: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: [adding Paolo and Vivek as cc] Hello, On 11/18/2014 07:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: It fixes the DRM deadlock, issue for me on exynos5800-peach-pi, but then it proceeds to panic in

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-19 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Javier, Kevin, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote: [adding Paolo and Vivek as cc] Hello, On 11/18/2014 07:41 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-18 Thread Kevin Hilman
Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: The Exynos DRM driver register its sub-devices platform drivers in the probe function but after commit 43c0767 (of/platform: Move platform devices under /sys/devices/platform), this is causing a deadlock in __driver_attach().

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-18 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-18 Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: The Exynos DRM driver register its sub-devices platform drivers in the probe function but after commit 43c0767 (of/platform: Move platform devices under /sys/devices/platform),

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init

2014-11-18 Thread Kevin Hilman
Gustavo Padovan gust...@padovan.org writes: 2014-11-18 Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes: The Exynos DRM driver register its sub-devices platform drivers in the probe function but after commit 43c0767 (of/platform: Move