Hi Olof,
On 25 February 2015 at 17:59, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:26:50PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 16 February 2015 at 01:19, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Hello Olof,
On 02/02/2015 12:26 PM, Javier Martinez
Hi,
On 16 February 2015 at 01:19, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Hello Olof,
On 02/02/2015 12:26 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello,
The mainline ChromeOS Embedded Controller (EC) driver is still missing some
features that are present in the
-by: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord
itself.
This change lets the EC report its errors separately.
[dianders: Added common function to cros_ec.c]
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
This is better.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
--
To unsubscribe from
.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
We never needed an EC-level interrupt, and have shipped at least three
products now that use this code, so I think it is safe enough to
declare
...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
devm allocation), but
it's good to document it.
[dianders: Resolved conflicts; documented that no code changes needed
on mainline]
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
The members of struct cros_ec_device were improperly commented, and
intermixed the private and public sections. This is just cleanup to make it
more obvious what goes with
field.
Except that it no longer prints I2C/SPI - i.e. the transport that is
used. Is that not considered important?
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Remove the three wrapper functions that talk to the EC without passing all
the desired arguments and just use the underlying communication function
that passes everything in
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Just because the host was able to talk to the EC doesn't mean that the EC
was happy with what it was told. Errors in communincation are not the same
as error messages from
Hi,
On 16 June 2014 14:40, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
When communicating with the EC, the cmd_xfer() function should return the
number of bytes it received from the EC, or negative on error.
This is just for the I2C tunnel feature,
Hi Doug,
On 17 June 2014 21:22, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct
Hi Doug,
On 17 June 2014 21:27, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644
--- a/drivers
a timeout after a single loop. Let's be paranoid and
make sure we do one last transfer after the timeout expires.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc
miscalculation causes the delay period to be
far too short. Most noticably this impacts commands with a long
turnaround time such as EC firmware reads and writes.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks dhend...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s
Hi Doug,
On 17 April 2014 11:59, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
The main transfer function for cros_ec_spi can be called by more than
one client at a time. Make sure that those clients don't stomp on
each other by locking the bus for the duration of the transfer
function.
Is
/chromiumos/platform/ec
[dianders: took today's ToT version from the Chromium OS EC; deleted
references to cros_ec_dev and cros_ec_lpc since those aren't upstream
yet]
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s
believe the EC protocol should be changed on future platforms to
poll for completion of I2C, but in the meantime this patch prevents
failure.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord
Hi Doug,
On 18 April 2014 15:15, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 17 April 2014 11:59, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
The main transfer function for cros_ec_spi can
Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Michael Spang sp...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul seanp...@chromium.org
---
Changes in v2:
- Separated the overcurrent and retries changes into two patches.
- No longer open code fet_is_enabled
Hi Doug,
On 16 April 2014 15:25, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
+#define MAX_CTRL_READ_TRIES5
+#define MAX_FET_ENABLE_TRIES 1000
Gosh that is a lot of tries - should we maybe give up sooner
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Wolfram,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:33:15PM +0530, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar yuvaraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar yuvaraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Yavaraj,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:32:01PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
I'm not convinced on the design of this protocol. It won't scale beyond
2 bus masters and it seems very specific to the design of a specific
+Olof
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:35:35AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
The arbitrator is a general purpose function which uses two GPIOs to
communicate with another device to claim/release a bus.
26 matches
Mail list logo
