Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-04-02 Thread Kukjin Kim
Chris Ball wrote: Hi Kukjin, Hi, Sorry for late response. [...] I can't send the tree as it is to Linus now, because Arnd has asked us to hold off on these device tree bindings and work with the unified bindings he's proposing instead. (Rebasing to drop that patch will introduce new confl

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-31 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Kukjin, On Wed, Mar 28 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> As a result I'm dropping this tree -- and all of the patches that I >>> have on top of it -- from mmc-next so that I can get a pull request >>> out. This means that I'm dropping: >> > Hmm, I think, if you're ok, you can send a second pull requ

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-28 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 03/28/12 02:54, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote: On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following: > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-27 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Kukjin, On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >> v3.4-for-cjb >> >> If any problems, please kindly let

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-02 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 03/03/12 05:40, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 22 2012, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:17:41AM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Pushed to mmc-next, thanks. (I'm expecting that you'll do the merge to Linus.) I've been sending patches adding runtime PM support to this driver for

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-03-02 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Wed, Feb 22 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:17:41AM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > >> Pushed to mmc-next, thanks. (I'm expecting that you'll do the merge >> to Linus.) > > I've been sending patches adding runtime PM support to this driver for a > while with no response - a

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:17:41AM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > Pushed to mmc-next, thanks. (I'm expecting that you'll do the merge > to Linus.) I've been sending patches adding runtime PM support to this driver for a while with no response - are there any issues with those? -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-21 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > v3.4-for-cjb > > If any problems, please kindly let me know. Pushed to mmc-next, thanks. (I'm expecting

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-21 Thread Kukjin Kim
Chris Ball wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > On Thu, Feb 16 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > I mean if I or you create topic branch for this whole series, can be > > merged into both tree for avoiding conflicts with further working. Of > > course, the topic branch don't have to rebase after merging into each >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-16 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Thu, Feb 16 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > I mean if I or you create topic branch for this whole series, can be > merged into both tree for avoiding conflicts with further working. Of > course, the topic branch don't have to rebase after merging into each > tree. > > If you're ok on this and my

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 02/12/12 06:37, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Thu, Feb 09 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: Looks ok to me and I'd like to pick this series in samsung tree with Chris' ack. Chris, is it ok? If you need to merge this in your tree, please let me know. I will provide topic branch for it. If any problems, pl

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-11 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Thu, Feb 09 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Looks ok to me and I'd like to pick this series in samsung tree with Chris' > ack. > > Chris, is it ok? If you need to merge this in your tree, please let me know. > I will provide topic branch for it. > > If any problems, please let me know. I don't h

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-02-09 Thread Kukjin Kim
Thomas Abraham wrote: > > This patchset removes all uses of 'clk_type' member from the platform data > of sdhci-s3c driver and adds device tree support for sdhci-s3c driver. > > In this patchset, all uses of 'clk_type' member from the platform data are > removed from the sdhci-s3c driver and plat

[PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support

2012-01-31 Thread Thomas Abraham
This patchset removes all uses of 'clk_type' member from the platform data of sdhci-s3c driver and adds device tree support for sdhci-s3c driver. In this patchset, all uses of 'clk_type' member from the platform data are removed from the sdhci-s3c driver and platform code. The clk_type is a SoC sp