Hi,
On 2020-08-26 23:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On 2020-08-26 17:43, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:39:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > Following up as ARC glibc port was merged upstream in 2.32. Can we now
> > > give
> > >
Hi Helmut,
On 2/26/21 1:47 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Unfortunately, no. Debian has started freezing in preparating of the
bullseye release. Only up to version 2.31 is packaged and Aurelien seems
a little busy these days. If I recall correctly, 2.32 drops some
backwards compatibility stuff that
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:17:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Checking in to see if things have change since my last posting on this
> topic.
Appreciated. I would have forgotten about arc.
> Is glibc 2.32 now packaged for debian so we can attempt ARC rebootstrap ?
Unfortunately,
Hi Helmut, Aurelien
On 8/26/20 2:16 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On 2020-08-26 17:43, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> Hi Vineet,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:39:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> Following up as ARC glibc port was merged upstream in 2.32. Can we now give
>>>
Hi Helmut,
On 2020-08-26 17:43, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:39:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > Following up as ARC glibc port was merged upstream in 2.32. Can we now give
> > rebootstrap a spin for ARC Debian enablement.
>
> That's great news.
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:39:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Following up as ARC glibc port was merged upstream in 2.32. Can we now give
> rebootstrap a spin for ARC Debian enablement.
That's great news. Unfortunately, it's not that easy yet. rebootstrap
requires the relevant
Hi,
On 3/25/20 10:54 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future
>> what
>> other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux
>>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:28:36PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> One part of the question here is "why do we need libatomic-ops?". The
> answer to that is, because libgc uses it and libgc is used by e.g. gcc,
> gnutls, guile, and make. Possibly, some of these could be built without
> libgc, but
Hi Alexey,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:53:45PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Sorry for this stupid question but I'm not very familiar with use-cases for
> libatomic-ops so would like to get some more clarification on what's needed
> here.
>
> I know that GCC has quite a few built-ins for atomic
Hi Helmut,
> > 2. libgpg-error has ARC support since v1.33, see:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__git.gnupg.org_cgi-2Dbin_gitweb.cgi-3Fp-
> 3Dlibgpg-2Derror.git-3Ba-3Dcommit-3Bh-
>
Hi Alexey,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:51:44AM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> I guess almost all of the packages you mentioned already have
> needed improvements for ARC.
I didn't mean to imply that anything was missing. I just mentioned those
that usually need work without having checked any.
>
Hi Helmut,
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future
> > what
> > other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux
> > kernel,
> > gcc, binutils: all 3 of which are
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future what
> other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux
> kernel,
> gcc, binutils: all 3 of which are supported for ARC.
Hi Helmut,
On 2/20/20 8:27 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Since I saw arc in the subject, I also threw arc at rebootstrap. Turns
> out that glibc 2.30 does not yet cover arc and using unpackaged versions
> of glibc is non-trivial for rebootstrap, so I cannot do much about that.
> Once arc support
14 matches
Mail list logo
