On 20/03/15 12:14, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is the first thing I was thinking of, the cubietruck is the only
gbit phy using a20 design which does not need it, which is kinda fishy.
Actually, the OLinuXino-LIME2 has a gbit phy, doesn't define
CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY and doesn't initially
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 17:23 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
Based on that I'm now running a full test with tx delay == 1.
First results are positive, running with tx delay on the two problematic
boards I've managed a few successful flights runs over the weekend.
Today I'll deploy to all of the
Hi all,
At work I am in the process of deploying an array of 4 cubietrucks for
use in the Xen Project automated test framework.
2 of the 4 boards seem to work just fine in (repeated) pre-commissioning
tests but two are failing fairly reliably.
One with:
Timeout, server not responding.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start looking. Perhaps CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY
on the u-boot side might be relevant?
Yes that is the first thing I was thinking of, the cubietruck is the only
gbit phy
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start looking. Perhaps CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY
on the u-boot side might be relevant?
Yes that is the first
Hi,
On 20-03-15 15:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start looking. Perhaps CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY
on the u-boot side might
run the build jobs inside screen?
--
buZz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Hi,
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi all,
At work I am in the process of deploying an array of 4 cubietrucks for
use in the Xen Project automated test framework.
2 of the 4 boards seem to work just fine in (repeated) pre-commissioning
tests but two are failing fairly reliably.
One
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm going to triple check my remote recovery procedures and then do
some experiments on one of the problematic boards.
Actually, I remember I could use mw.l on the u-boot prompt to fiddle
with the register values, so no need for the
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 20-03-15 15:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start
10 matches
Mail list logo
