Hi,
On 06/09/2014 03:21 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Rename SUNXI_IRQ_NUMBER to IRQ_PER_BANK as it no longer represents the total
>>> number of irqs and use it instead of th
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Rename SUNXI_IRQ_NUMBER to IRQ_PER_BANK as it no longer represents the total
>> number of irqs and use it instead of the number of irqs-per-reg when
>> calculating the bank to
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Rename SUNXI_IRQ_NUMBER to IRQ_PER_BANK as it no longer represents the total
> number of irqs and use it instead of the number of irqs-per-reg when
> calculating the bank to use for the various sunxi_irq_xxx_reg functions.
> This fixe
