Hi,
On 09/20/2012 11:42 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
Hi,
It with pleasure that I would like to announce the release of libusbx
1.0.13. This version brings the following notable changes:
The Fedora packages for libusbx have been upgraded to 1.0.13 now.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/20/2012 11:42 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
Hi,
It with pleasure that I would like to announce the release of libusbx
1.0.13. This version brings the following notable changes:
The Fedora packages for libusbx have been
Hi Greg,
On 09/24/2012 05:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/20/2012 11:42 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
Hi,
It with pleasure that I would like to announce the release of libusbx
1.0.13. This version brings the following notable changes:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:36:11PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 09/24/2012 05:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/20/2012 11:42 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
Hi,
It with pleasure that I would like to announce the release
On 2012.09.24 19:50, Greg KH wrote:
Please fix this in libusbx, or bump the .so name so that tools can
properly know that the API has changed, and that they want to build
against the old one.
Well, if you leave us no other alternative, then I guess my vote will be
for option 2, especially as
On 24.9.2012 21.47, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
And if I'm going to be forced to change my program, and libusbx has now
shown that they don't care about their public api, well, I might as well
just rewrite it to remove that dependancy completly, as it's obvious
they don't know how to treat
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:47:27 -0700, Greg KH said:
No, you are forcing me to change my program to have it build with your
change, you should do it the other way around. If you want programs to
use your library, make it so that they don't have to be changed at all.
And if I'm going to be forced
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:20:10PM -0400, Sean McBride wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:47:27 -0700, Greg KH said:
No, you are forcing me to change my program to have it build with your
change, you should do it the other way around. If you want programs to
use your library, make it so that
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/24/2012 08:50 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:36:11PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 09/24/2012 05:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16:25PM +0300, Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
On 24.9.2012 21.47, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
And if I'm going to be forced to change my program, and libusbx has now
shown that they don't care about their public api, well, I might as well
just rewrite it to remove that
On 2012.09.24 20:31, Greg KH wrote:
No one delivered any such fix, all I got was a bunch of bug reports
this morning from the distros saying that usbutils was suddenly broken.
That shows that libusbx is really the problem here, and that maybe I
shouldn't depend on it anymore.
Could you please
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:35:07PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2012.09.24 20:31, Greg KH wrote:
No one delivered any such fix, all I got was a bunch of bug reports
this morning from the distros saying that usbutils was suddenly broken.
That shows that libusbx is really the problem here, and
On 24.9.2012 22.31, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
Um, breaking existing applications is not indicative of that, don't you
agree?
You never make bad calls and you think this was a deliberate
attempt not to care for users? If you think it is a bug and a bad
choice, why not say it, instead of
: libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, libusbx-de...@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, libusb-win32-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, 24 September, 2012 9:31:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx-1.0.13 has been released
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16:25PM +0300, Kustaa
@vger.kernel.org, libusb-win32-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, 24 September, 2012 9:31:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx-1.0.13 has been released
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16:25PM +0300, Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
On 24.9.2012 21.47, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
And if I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo
