Re: [linux-usb-devel] ALCHEMY: AU1200 USB Host Controller (OHCI/EHCI)

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Popov
> > Special thanks to Pete Popov and his merry band of kernel hackers for > > paving the way by pushing to seperate EHCI and PCI in the USB subsystem. > > Actually that patch started with Matt Porter, although some earlier > non-mergeable versions came from ARC (now TDI). And splitting it out >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Kernel panics at USB initialization with kexec

2005-12-09 Thread David Brownell
> > Any thoughts on what could be going wrong? > > Hm, no I don't, this is the first report. What is the error that > happens? > > David, any ideas? The original poster on this thread showed a completely normal kernel boot, and called it a panic. Then said that it worked OK in a later kernel.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] usblp: add suspend/resume support

2005-12-09 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 09 December 2005 8:01 pm, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:40:50PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > - if (usb_submit_urb(usblp->readurb, GFP_KERNEL) < 0) > > + if (usblp->suspended || usb_submit_urb(usblp->readurb, > > + GFP_KERNEL) < 0

Re: [linux-usb-devel] ALCHEMY: AU1200 USB Host Controller (OHCI/EHCI)

2005-12-09 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 08 December 2005 1:00 pm, Jordan Crouse wrote: > Ok, here we go. I give you the OHCI/EHCI host controller support for > the Alchemy AU1200 processor. I'm sending this up, partly because I have > it ready to go, but also because it seems that enough folks are getting their > hands on A

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Question about periodic scheduling

2005-12-09 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 08 December 2005 4:58 pm, jpu wrote: > Hi: > >I have some questions about periodic scheduling. >Now I'm planning to write a hcd for the host controller in our embedded > system > using Linux 2.6,and this host controller supports USB2.0,but is non-PCI as > well as > not EHCI

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Kernel panics at USB initialization with kexec

2005-12-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:43:23PM +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:54:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:20:09PM +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:17:48PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:05:02P

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Error recovery in Xen's paravirtualizing USB driver for Linux

2005-12-09 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Part of the problem is that the stub drivers on the back-end are forced to > > > bind to USB interfaces instead of USB devices.

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] usblp: add suspend/resume support

2005-12-09 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:40:50PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > - if (usb_submit_urb(usblp->readurb, GFP_KERNEL) < 0) > + if (usblp->suspended || usb_submit_urb(usblp->readurb, > + GFP_KERNEL) < 0) > dbg("error submitting urb")

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usblp: add suspend/resume support

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
Greg: This patch (as619) adds support for suspend/resume to the usblp driver. Alan Stern Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- In 2.6.15, any USB driver without such support will prevent the system from suspending. So it would be nice, although it's certainly not critical, if

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > I can suspend and resume successfully using your latest patch. Previous > patch had been reversed prior to the test as you suggested. Good. > > However it's probably too late for this to go into 2.6.15 -- more likely > > it won't appear until

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5

2005-12-09 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Alan Stern schrieb: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Please send the patch above for inclusion in 2.6.15. Thanks for your help! Unfortunately that patch is not suitable for the kernel. Below is another patch that _is_ suitable. If this one works as well as the other (be

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 USB Host driver compile fix

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Popov
Hi David, > > >controller. I don't think anyone will do that > though. > I'm not sure why they wouldn't. Full speed > controllers have limited bandwidth, people sometimes want > more than one just to get enough bandwidth to do whatever > it is they need USB to help with. My reasoning is that

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 USB Host driver compile fix

2005-12-09 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 08 December 2005 8:51 am, Vladimir A. Barinov wrote: > Hello Ralf, David, > > Could you please advise. > What is the right solution in the situation when USB PCI and on-chip USB > used in the situation when we want ohci-hcd to be a module? > > Vladimir > > Peter Popov wrote: > > >I

[linux-usb-devel] Re: usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5

2005-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > since I switched to 2.6.15-rc2-git6, my machine is not able to suspend > > anymore if my USB printer is plugged in. The problem is reproducible. > > > > usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 > > drivers/usb/class/usblp.c: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 3 i

[linux-usb-devel] Re: usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5

2005-12-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:54:31PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi, Hi Carl-Daniel, > since I switched to 2.6.15-rc2-git6, my machine is not able to suspend > anymore if my USB printer is plugged in. The problem is reproducible. > > usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Error recovery in Xen's paravirtualizing USB driver for Linux

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Harry Butterworth wrote: > While you are discussing this stuff, you might like to consider the > problem of stealing a device from a back-end driver that has already > claimed it. I don't know if this is currently possible. With my > testing so far I have had to disable the b

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Error recovery in Xen's paravirtualizing USB driver for Linux

2005-12-09 Thread Harry Butterworth
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 11:11 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Part of the problem is that the stub drivers on the back-end are forced to > > > bind to USB interfaces instead of USB devices. It woul

Re: [linux-usb-devel] dm2 Device driver issue.

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Bonser
On 12/9/05, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Paul Bonser wrote: > > > I knew it was a good idea to read the USB bus specification :) > > > > T: Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=06 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 10 Spd= 1.5 MxCh= 0 > > D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1

Re: [linux-usb-devel] dm2 Device driver issue.

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Paul Bonser wrote: > I knew it was a good idea to read the USB bus specification :) > > T: Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=06 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 10 Spd= 1.5 MxCh= 0 > D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 > P: Vendor=0665 ProdID=0301 Rev= 0.03 > C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#=

Re: [linux-usb-devel] dm2 Device driver issue.

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Bonser
On 12/9/05, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Paul Bonser wrote: > Well, that would certainly do it. The Linux USB drivers do not accept > bulk URBs for low-speed devices. (The UHCI driver doesn't -- I'm not sure > about the OHCI driver. This could explain the differenc

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Isochronous Stack problem

2005-12-09 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Kaustubh Sarwate wrote: > I have been trying to get the USB isochronous stack to work on a > development board supporting ARM 10 core. I built the kernel with > audio support and have been trying to cat a wav file into the > /dev/dsp device which is registered to the USB 2.0 audio speakers > I am u

Re: [linux-usb-devel] dm2 Device driver issue.

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Paul Bonser wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on a linux driver for the Mixman dm2 ( > http://mixman.com/products/dm2.html ), and I'm having a bit of an > issue. > The device has a bunch of buttons and doo-dads (including some LEDs), > and communicates with the computer via an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.14.3 and the Lacie F800.

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote: > the usb-storage module no longer produces muhc of an error scroll, > although the kernel continues not to be able to deal. > > I recompiled with USB_DEBUG defined, and now I get these: > > ehci_hcd :00:03.3: port 2 high speed > ehci_hcd :00:03.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 2.6.14] usb-storage: sat passthru sense size compatibility

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Ugh. Is there no way to convince the SCSI people to add an autosense > request size field to the SRB? This question belongs on the linux-scsi list (CC'ed). Unless I'm mistaken, this feature would require a modification to the block layer's struct reque

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Error recovery in Xen's paravirtualizing USB driver for Linux

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Part of the problem is that the stub drivers on the back-end are forced to > > bind to USB interfaces instead of USB devices. It would make life simpler > > for you guys if the stub driver could b

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Please send the patch above for inclusion in 2.6.15. > > Thanks for your help! Unfortunately that patch is not suitable for the kernel. Below is another patch that _is_ suitable. If this one works as well as the other (be sure to remove the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Error recovery in Xen's paravirtualizing USB driver for Linux

2005-12-09 Thread Harry Butterworth
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:44 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Part of the problem is that the stub drivers on the back-end are forced to > > bind to USB interfaces instead of USB devices. It would make life simpler > > for you guys if the stub