On Monday 19 June 2006 7:48 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> So the reporter appears to be saying that the mere presence of that module
> makes the machine fail, despite (or because of?) the absence of that
> driver's hardware?
Which would mean some problem in PCI or the module loader, not USB.
And
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:21:50 -0700
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 3:47 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > yaregression
>
> Or at least a severe problem between brain and keyboard.
>
> Get this: a system with VIA kt-400 hardware,
> which ** DOES NOT INCLUDE OHC
Hi,
I apologize for intruding into your busy schedule. Please allow me to introduce
ourselves to you.
We provide publishing-related services to international clientele
(http://www.e-BookServices.com). Located in India, we
cater to both organizations, as well as individuals.
Our range of servi
On Monday 19 June 2006 3:47 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> yaregression
Or at least a severe problem between brain and keyboard.
Get this: a system with VIA kt-400 hardware,
which ** DOES NOT INCLUDE OHCI ** is getting some
problem ... which is then blamed on the OHCI driver.
And the "bug report
This patch adds basic Wireless USB 1.0 definitions to usb_ch9.h that
fit into the existing set of declarations. Boils down to two new
recipients for requests (ports and remote pipes), rpipe reset and
abort request codes and wire adapter and remote pipe descriptor
types.
Wire adapters are the USB
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:59:28 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6694] New: SD card after umount defect.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694
Summary: SD card after umount defect.
Kernel Version: 2
yaregression
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 05:09:41 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6708] New: ohci_hcd hangs on insertion of usb device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6708
Summary: ohci_hcd hangs on insert
a regression
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:00:52 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6701] New: 4-in-1 reader's LED still shines after
shutdown
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6701
Summary: 4-in-1 reader's L
Again, this behaves properly as a wakeup events source,
at least from the "standby" state.
OHCI updates for AT91 series processors:
- Get ready for at91sam926x processors (ARMv5tej not ARMv4t)
- Suspend/resume support now behaves properly
- In "standby" mode, OHCI can be a source of system wa
On Monday 19 June 2006 9:52 am, Iordan (Danny) Ignatov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I get the following error when attaching a USB device :
>
> # usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using isp116x-hcd and address 2
> td: f 0s0 0,8,64 0 101
> -> 00 05 02 00 00 00 00 00
> td: 5 0s0 0,8,64 1 001
> ...
>
>
Finally, an embedded Linux platform that handles USB wakeup events. :)
UDC updates for AT91 series processors:
- Get ready for at91sam926x processors (ARMv5tej not ARMv4t)
- Suspend/resume support now behaves properly
- In "standby" mode, UDC can be a source of system wakeup events
(host
Greg:
This patch (as725) adds an unusual_devs entry for the Motorola RAZR V3x.
Alan Stern
From: Davide Perini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: usb-2.6/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h
=
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:22:43PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
>
> Hi Yuzhu,
>
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:12:52 -0400
> "Robert Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | I am using USB SERIAL DRIVER with Linux 2.6.15.
> |
> | I noticed that the driver can only be loaded on
You know, Windows uses an INQUIRY message. Does the RAZR work with
Windows? Can you use a USB sniffer program (like USB Snoopy) to find out
what packets are sent when the RAZR is connected to a Windows host?
Also, can you try setting CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG and post the log
showing what goe
Greg:
This revised patch (as713b) moves a few routines among source files in
usbcore. Some driver-related code in usb.c (claiming interfaces and
matching IDs) is moved to driver.c, where it belongs. Also the
usb_generic stuff in driver.c is moved to a new source file: generic.c.
(That's the re
From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moves the driver's num_ports call code to its new function, this makes
usb_serial_probe() simpler.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 40 ---
From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moves the driver's probe call code to its new function, this makes
usb_serial_probe() simpler.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 52 +--
Hi Greg.
This patch series is the first part of my proposal to brake usb_serial_probe()
function into small parts.
The goal is to make usb_serial_probe() smaller, clean and easy to follow.
Any comment is welcome.
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 176 +++---
From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moves the port creation code to its own function, this makes
usb_serial_probe() simpler.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 37 +++--
1 file
From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moves the driver's attach call code to its new function, this makes
usb_serial_probe() simpler.
Note that it can't be called driver_attach(), because it already exists.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
dri
Hi Yuzhu,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:12:52 -0400
"Robert Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I am using USB SERIAL DRIVER with Linux 2.6.15.
|
| I noticed that the driver can only be loaded once with one Vendor and Product
ID. If I want to try another product id, I have to unload the drive
> > > > An alternative (but post-boot) workaround _should_ be
> > > >
> > > > echo disabled > /sys/bus/pci/devices/:00:02.0/power/wakeup
> >
> > Did that work?
> >
>
> No. But
>
> echo -n disabled >
> /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb1/power/wakeup
That's what I meant ...
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Davide Perini wrote:
> Here why I use this three flags.
> US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY because computer attempts to read a sector greater
> than the actual capacity but less than the reported capacity, the
> Motorola RAZR V3x will dutifully report an I/O error.
> US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY
Greg:
This revised patch (as715b) renames usb_suspend_device to
usb_port_suspend, usb_resume_device to usb_port_resume, and
finish_device_resume to finish_port_resume. There was no objection to the
original version of the patch so this should be okay to apply.
The revision was needed only becaus
You should read the instructions near the top of unusual_devs.h about
keeping entries in numerical order and where to email new entries.
Ok, sorry.
I've corrected my patch in order to keeping entries in numerical order.
I have mailed this patch to you, Phil and list.
Are you sure that the
Greg:
This patch (as712b) is a slight revision of one submitted earlier. It
fixes the usb-skeleton example driver so that it won't try to submit URBs
after skel_disconnect() has returned. This could cause errors, if the
driver was unbound and then a different driver was bound to the device.
It
Greg:
This patch (as711b) is a revised version of an earlier submission. It
modifies the usbfs code to detect when a device has been unregistered from
usbfs, even if the device is still connected. Although this can't happen
now, it will be able to happen after the upcoming changes to usb_generic
Greg:
finish_device_resume() in the hub driver isn't careful always to return a
negative code in all the error pathways. It also doesn't return 0 in all
the success pathways. This patch (as724) fixes the behavior.
Alan Stern
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: usb-2.6/
Greg:
The usbfs code doesn't provide sufficient mutual exclusion among open,
release, and remove. Release vs. remove is okay because they both acquire
the device lock, but open is not exclusive with either one. All three
routines modify the udev->filelist linked list, so they must not run
concur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 June 2006 22:16, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 10:29 am, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 June 2006 20:29, David Brownell wrote:
> > > An alternative (but post-boot) workaround _should_ be
> > >
> > > echo disa
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Davide Perini wrote:
> Hello,
> previously I've just sent to the list some entry for
> unusualdevs.h.
>
> Now I attach this patch for that entry.
> This patch fix I/O problem on Motorola RAZR V3x.
You should read the instructions near the top of unusual_devs.h about
keeping
Hello,
previously I've just sent to the list some entry for
unusualdevs.h.
Now I attach this patch for that entry.
This patch fix I/O problem on Motorola RAZR V3x.
Here my
/proc/bus/usb/devices
running with my patch.
T: Bus=03 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2
B: Alloc=
Hi,
I am using USB SERIAL DRIVER with Linux 2.6.15.
I noticed that the driver can only be loaded once with one Vendor and Product
ID. If I want to try another product id, I have to unload the driver and then
load it with this product id.
Is there a way to allow the driver accept multiple produ
Hi all,
I get the following error when attaching a USB device :
# usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using isp116x-hcd and address 2
td: f 0s0 0,8,64 0 101
-> 00 05 02 00 00 00 00 00
td: 5 0s0 0,8,64 1 001
...
usb 1-1: device not accepting address 2, error -110
error -110 seems to be quite c
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Wojciech Kromer wrote:
> After reading lot of discusions on this issue, I can't still get
> why there is an error booting from root=/dev/sda1 or even root=8:1.
>
> I'm using 2.6.15 and grub.
> Everything needed to mount /dev/sda1 is compiled into kernel,
> and I can mount it
贵公司负责人(经理/财务)您好：
我公司是深圳市恒威实业有限公司.本公司实力雄厚(全国各地均有分公司).
有着良好的社会关系.因我公司进项较多完成不了每月定税额度,每月有一部分
各行业增值税电脑发票（海关缴款书）6％和普通发票(国税/地税)如商品销售
餐饮业.其他服务业．建筑安装等等发票以2％优惠代开与合作.可以为贵公司
节省运做成本.还可以根据贵公司要求代开的数量额度来商讨代开优惠的点数.
我公司有经验丰富的办税专
Health update
Recapture your youth and Feel the Energy
For Many, This is a Powerful Second Chance
press here to read about
http://www.telling-biz.com/c/
This common element can change the way you experience the next half of your
life
-Original Message-
From: khadijah [mailto:[EMAIL PR
On 6/19/06, Wojciech Kromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After reading lot of discusions on this issue, I can't still get
> why there is an error booting from root=/dev/sda1 or even root=8:1.
>
so, what is the error shown? i hope usb-storage module is built into the kernel!
> and I can mount it af
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:05:20PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> > This patch:
>> >
>> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-04-usb/airprime_major_update.patch
>>
>> I've ap
After reading lot of discusions on this issue, I can't still get
why there is an error booting from root=/dev/sda1 or even root=8:1.
I'm using 2.6.15 and grub.
Everything needed to mount /dev/sda1 is compiled into kernel,
and I can mount it after booting the same kernel from network.
I'm trying
40 matches
Mail list logo
