[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-27 Thread Duncan Sands
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 23:59, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility to show this, like under windows?).

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-27 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:01:48AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: Ugh, my merge there was messy, that's my fault, sorry. I'll go clean up the merge and see if your patch applies then. Yup, my fault. I've now applied this patch, sorry for jumping to the wrong conclusion. greg k-h

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-27 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: On Wednesday 26 February 2003 23:59, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-26 Thread Oliver Neukum
Yes, but I think that you should notify the network layer too. I see no reason any network driver shouldn't report this directly. There's nothing specific to ATM in losing signal. It's purely physical thing low level drivers should deal with. I can't notify the network layer because

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility to show this, like under windows?). We no longer consult the usb_device struct in

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-25 Thread Duncan Sands
On Monday 24 February 2003 11:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Montag, 24. Februar 2003 10:58 schrieb Duncan Sands: Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility to show this, like under windows?). We

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-25 Thread Oliver Neukum
Hi Oliver, thanks for your comments. While I agree with you in principle, I disagree in practice. The driver exports the following information in /proc/net/atm/speedtch: (1) name and location of the USB device (2) MAC address (serial number) (3) AAL5 transmission statistics (4) Line

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-25 Thread Duncan Sands
Hi Oliver, On Tuesday 25 February 2003 21:54, Oliver Neukum wrote: Hi Oliver, thanks for your comments. While I agree with you in principle, I disagree in practice. The driver exports the following information in /proc/net/atm/speedtch: (1) name and location of the USB device (2)

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info

2003-02-24 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Montag, 24. Februar 2003 10:58 schrieb Duncan Sands: Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility to show this, like under windows?). We no longer consult the usb_device struct in