Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-08 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 17:28, Alan Stern wrote: > > Dan: > > > > By the way, I just noticed that the Casio QV unusual_devs.h entry has > > US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY. Do you know why it's there, or if it's really > > needed? Can you post a usb-storage debugging

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-07 Thread Dan Scholnik
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 17:28, Alan Stern wrote: > Dan: > > By the way, I just noticed that the Casio QV unusual_devs.h entry has > US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY. Do you know why it's there, or if it's really > needed? Can you post a usb-storage debugging log showing what happens > when you remove that fla

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-07 Thread Alan Stern
Dan: By the way, I just noticed that the Casio QV unusual_devs.h entry has US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY. Do you know why it's there, or if it's really needed? Can you post a usb-storage debugging log showing what happens when you remove that flag? (I have a long-running background project to remove as

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-01 Thread Dan Scholnik
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 14:14, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > > > Up until the 2.6 kernels, there was one entry for all the QV cameras > > with both US_SC_8070 and US_PR_CB that I think seemed to work fine for > > everyone. As far as I know the only problem was all th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > Up until the 2.6 kernels, there was one entry for all the QV cameras > with both US_SC_8070 and US_PR_CB that I think seemed to work fine for > everyone. As far as I know the only problem was all the folks emailing > the log entry stating that the Casio e

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-01 Thread Dan Scholnik
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 11:11, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > Sorry to add to the Casio-induced headache, but... > > > > In february I sent in a patch to split the Casio QV entry in > > unusual_devs.h into 2 entries, the first of which overr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-06-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > Hi - > > Sorry to add to the Casio-induced headache, but... > > In february I sent in a patch to split the Casio QV entry in > unusual_devs.h into 2 entries, the first of which overrode both the > protocol and the subclass to work around wha

[linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry for Casio QV2000UX

2004-05-31 Thread Dan Scholnik
Hi - Sorry to add to the Casio-induced headache, but... In february I sent in a patch to split the Casio QV entry in unusual_devs.h into 2 entries, the first of which overrode both the protocol and the subclass to work around what I assume are Casio bugs. (Originally there was a