On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Joel Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to submit this bug report. I have filed a bug with
> gentoo's bugzilla and was told to report the bug to this address as
> well. The link to the gentoo bug report is:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61101
>
> Basically my exte
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Mathias Gug wrote:
>
>
>
> >From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Okay, that clears it up!
> >
> >The only difference is the removal of the parentheses around the ep
> >parameter in the macro texts. Perusal of the kernel code shows that this
> >will make a difference in o
From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem happens between 2.4.21-pre4 and pre5. The following patch
> breaks things :
>
> --- include/linux/usb.h.orig 2003-11-12 23:39:28.0 +0100
> +++ include/linux/usb.h 2003-11-12 23:41:13.0 +0100
> @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@
> #define usb_p
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Mathias Gug wrote:
> The problem happens between 2.4.21-pre4 and pre5. The following patch
> breaks things :
>
> --- include/linux/usb.h.orig 2003-11-12 23:39:28.0 +0100
> +++ include/linux/usb.h 2003-11-12 23:41:13.0 +0100
> @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@
> #def
From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've tried to reset all endpoints (0,5 and 7) and rescan the usb bus
once
> the firmware is uploaded and before sending the first control message.
But
> it doesn't solve the problem : I still get the USB control message
timeouts.
Do you call usb_reset_d
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Mathias Gug wrote:
> >A distinct possibility is that the modem needs to be reset somehow in
> >order for the new firmware to take effect. If that reset were failing, it
> >could account for what you see.
> >
>
> I've tried to reset all endpoints (0,5 and 7) and rescan the usb
From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I use a program "amload" to upload a firmware image into a ADSL
modem
> > > (zyxel 630-11 - based on Alcatel Dynamite chipset). It uses ubsdevfs
to
> > > upload the firmware.
> > >
> > > It can upload the firmware (using ep 5).
> > >
> > > Then amload t
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Mathias Gug wrote:
> I have this problem on 2.6.0-test9.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mathias
>
> >From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [linu
I have this problem on 2.6.0-test9.
Cheers,
Mathias
From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG REPORT] Timeout when sending control
messages
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:21:06 -0500 (EST)
On Thu,
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Mathias Gug wrote:
> I use a program "amload" to upload a firmware image into a ADSL modem
> (zyxel 630-11 - based on Alcatel Dynamite chipset). It uses ubsdevfs to
> upload the firmware.
>
> It can upload the firmware (using ep 5).
>
> Then amload tries to send control mes
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Heinrich du Toit wrote:
| Acording to www.kernel.org bugzilla is only for kernel 2.5.x
That's correct.
| So I guess there's not much hope for me. :-(
|
| Jon Smirl wrote:
|
| >Try putting it into the kernel bug tracker:
| >http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
| >
| >Then post a refer
Acording to www.kernel.org bugzilla is only for kernel 2.5.x
So I guess there's not much hope for me. :-(
Jon Smirl wrote:
Try putting it into the kernel bug tracker:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
Then post a reference to it on the USB list.
=
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Your patch actually seems to do the job when -ETIMEDOUT is added to the
> case "disconnect() waiting for us to drop semaphore?". At least for me
Try the patches I just sent ... someone a while back went through
the work to make sure print jobs don't just die on ETIMEDOUT,
and I'd be cautious a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
Your patch actually seems to do the job when -ETIMEDOUT is added to the
case "disconnect() waiting for us to drop semaphore?". At least for me
:-). Now I simply get:
# cat /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.12-20 > /dev/usb/lp0
cat: write error: Connectio
rownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug report
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks a lot for your help! Your l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
Thanks a lot for your help! Your latest patch behaves exactly the same as
the previous one, i.e. I get a flood of
printer.c: usblp0: failed reading printer status
Again, rmmod usb-ohci stops the message flood, and also produces an oops.
Thanks for testing this, Anders!
> I did my usual "cat /boot/bzImage > /dev/usb/lp0" immediately after
> turning my printer off, which usually results in an oops and a kernel
> lockup. With David's patch, however, the kernel just got busy
> printing the line over and over again:
>
> printer.c:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I tried out David Brownell's usb-printer patch (attached), which
indeed makes things better on my system (Athlon 500 with Redhat 6.1
and an otherwise unmodified 2.4.4 kernel).
I did my usual "cat /boot/bzImage > /dev/usb/lp0" immediately afte
> Here is the good old bug which causes my Athlon to oops and lockup
> when I try to do 'cat large-file > /dev/usb/lp0' after turning my USB
> printer off. The oops seems to occur when the kernel figures out that
> the printer has been turned off. The bug also causes my system to
> freeze when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > From: "Anders S. Buch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 21:28:39 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > Here is the good old bug which causes my Athlon to oops and lockup
> > when I tr
> From: "Anders S. Buch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 21:28:39 -0400 (EDT)
> Here is the good old bug which causes my Athlon to oops and lockup
> when I try to do 'cat large-file > /dev/usb/lp0' after turning my USB
> printer off. The oops seems to occur
> - Dave
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 5:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug report (2.4.1)
>
>
inter). But it sure surprised
me how long it took for that bug to get reported!
- Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-dev
23 matches
Mail list logo
