Re: [usb-storage] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] usb-storage abort path cleanup

2002-05-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:50:44PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:40:50PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > Hrm... okay, what's the best BK way to handle this? Do I generate a new > > changeset to fix this, or go back into an older tree and generate a > > different solution/chan

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] usb-storage abort path cleanup

2002-05-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:40:50PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Hrm... okay, what's the best BK way to handle this? Do I generate a new > changeset to fix this, or go back into an older tree and generate a > different solution/changeset? Best way is to probably do the following: - resyn

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] usb-storage abort path cleanup

2002-05-26 Thread Matthew Dharm
Hrm... okay, what's the best BK way to handle this? Do I generate a new changeset to fix this, or go back into an older tree and generate a different solution/changeset? Matt On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:19:33PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 05:44:07PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote