> Which version of that driver are you using? As I understand,
> the the version that's been in the tree longest didn't work
> very well.
Yes, this driver is very borked. We hired a USB company to get it working
and to get rid of some USB protocol violations. The driver I'm using is now
on the ne
Hi folks,
Here is a small patch to bump the ftdi_sio driver's version number
to 1.3.5 for the usb-2.4 tree. It would be nice if this made it
into the final 2.4.23 kernel sources, then I could refer to that as
version 1.3.5 of the driver.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTEC
I'm currently using test-8, with no patches. When I mount a usb storage
device using the EHCI driver I get about 128MB copied and then one of
the HT CPUs gets locked into a 100% IO wait. At least this is what I
assume due to top reporting 50% idle and 50% I/O Wait. Is this a known
bug? Is there
Hi folks,
Here are a couple of patches for the ftdi_sio USB serial driver.
They can be applied cleanly to the usb-2.4 and usb-2.5 trees and
also to the 2.4.23-pre7 kernel tree. I guess they'll also apply
cleanly to the 2.6.0-test8 kernel tree but I haven't tried that
yet.
I have compiled an
Joshua Wise wrote:
Do you see that only on pxa250 B1 silicon? How about C0?
I only have B1 silicon, unfortunately. (Actually.. I might have later silicon
in my h1910, but that's another can of worms, as I'm not certain of the
status of linux on the h1910 yet.)
Yes, that's a C0 as I recall fro
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:11:00AM -0400, David T Hollis wrote:
> * ax8817x_set_multicast - need address of dev->data, not the contents
> * ax8817x_write_cmd_async - free the request structure if urb submit fails
> * Add ethtool get_link, get_settings, and set_settings
> * ax8817x_bind - remove IPG
On Tuesday 21 Oct 2003 15:44, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:02:08PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Here are a couple of patches for the ftdi_sio USB serial
> > driver.
>
> Please, one patch per email. Care to resend them?
>
> greg k-h
Here you go (2 of 2) (can be app
Richard Reich wrote:
I'm currently using test-8, with no patches. When I mount a usb storage
device using the EHCI driver I get about 128MB copied and then one of
the HT CPUs gets locked into a 100% IO wait. At least this is what I
assume due to top reporting 50% idle and 50% I/O Wait. Is this a
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:02:08PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here are a couple of patches for the ftdi_sio USB serial driver.
Please, one patch per email. Care to resend them?
greg k-h
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by O
* ax8817x_set_multicast - need address of dev->data, not the contents
* ax8817x_write_cmd_async - free the request structure if urb submit fails
* Add ethtool get_link, get_settings, and set_settings
* ax8817x_bind - remove IPG read/write bit as it is not needed with GPIO
fiddling
If the bugs fix
Richard Reich wrote:
I'm currently using test-8, with no patches. When I mount a usb storage
device using the EHCI driver I get about 128MB copied and then one of
the HT CPUs gets locked into a 100% IO wait. At least this is what I
assume due to top reporting 50% idle and 50% I/O Wait. Is this a
On Tuesday 21 Oct 2003 15:44, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:02:08PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Here are a couple of patches for the ftdi_sio USB serial
> > driver.
>
> Please, one patch per email. Care to resend them?
Here you go (1 of 2) (can be applied to usb-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Boots just fine, NFS-over-USB, at 400 MHz. The reason to leave
> the clock lower was that smc91x didn't usually initialize with
> turbo mode, and the MTD/JFFS root wasn't working.
Yeah. The issue here seemed to be mitigated by me setting fixing the
hub 1-0:1.0: new USB device on port 2, assigned address 3
usb-storage: This device (07cf,1001,1000 S 05 P 01) has unneeded SubClass and
Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
Please send a copy of this message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This S
From: Mrs Serena Jones
PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Dr.
Harry Jones who worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years
before he died in the year
2000.
We were married for eleven years without a
All,
I just upgraded to 2.6.0-test8 hoping that the upgrade would stop the
oops' I keep getting when trying to backup my Treo 300.
I am attaching the output from dmesg. Any and all suggestions would be
greatly welcomed.
Thank you,
-Jamie
***
* Provide operational link testing via ethtool
* Provide get/set features via ethtool.
--- usbnet.c.orig 2003-10-21 12:54:01.185020616 -0400
+++ usbnet.c2003-10-21 12:52:48.845017968 -0400
@@ -637,6 +637,27 @@
info->eedump_len = 0x3e;
}
+static u32 ax8817x_get_link (struct net_
Hi,
Is it possible to boot off of an USB device in 2.4.22? There was a patch
that allowed for long recognition times in earlier kernels, but it does
not apply now. I have seen some discussion on this list and on the
linux-kernel list about it, but have not found any conclusive patches or
sugge
* ax8817x_set_multicast - use address of dev->data, not contents
* ax8817x_write_async_cmd - free request and urb if submit fails
--- a/drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c 2003-10-20 23:43:22.0 -0400
+++ b/drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c 2003-10-21 12:49:13.519752384 -0400
@@ -493,8 +493,11 @@
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Markus Germeier wrote:
> Hello Greg, Hello all,
>
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How about:
> > (3) rewrite MPIO code to use libusb/usbfs to not require any kernel
> > module at all.
> >
> > Could that be possible? Is there anything that y
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:10:26AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:16:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Greg:
> > >
> > > Do you have any idea when serious new development will re-commence?
> >
> > Has it ever really stopped? :
Hi,
Is it possible to boot off of an USB device in 2.4.22? There was a patch
that allowed for long recognition times in earlier kernels, but it does
not apply now. I have seen some discussion on this list and on the
linux-kernel list about it, but have not found any conclusive patches or
sugge
If you want me to send this patch to Linus, then send me two patches,
one with the bug fixes, and one with the ethtool changes. I'll send him
the bug fixes and queue the ethtool changes for when 2.6.0 comes out.
After David B acks them of course :)
The patches I just saw were fine AFAICT.
- Dave
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:19:48 -0400 "Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Is it possible to boot off of an USB device in 2.4.22? There was a patch
| that allowed for long recognition times in earlier kernels, but it does
| not apply now. I have seen some discussio
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:50:47PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > Hmm... The interface number fix means making adjustments to a number of
> > > drivers. Here's the idea: Up to now the USB stack has supported the
> > > notion, explicitly stated in the US
[1] Kernel oops generated when I try to access my USB camera
[2] If I try to access my digital camera, using gphoto2, an "oops" is
generated. Here's what I did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] usb-debug]# lspci | grep -i usb
00:14.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:18:35 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Markus Germeier wrote:
| > Hello Greg, Hello all,
| >
| > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > > How about:
| > > (3) rewrite MPIO code to use libusb/usbfs to not require any
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, christian wimmer wrote:
> hub 1-0:1.0: new USB device on port 2, assigned address 3
> usb-storage: This device (07cf,1001,1000 S 05 P 01) has unneeded SubClass and
> Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
>Please send a copy of this message to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greg:
M
Hi
I experience aborts with external usb hd, that also pause all disk
operations for some seconds.
It doesn't happen with 2.4.21 kernel.
Please tell me if I can do anything useful to debug the problem. I can use
kgdb or other techniques.
It's getting very annoying since the disk stays for more
Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, David Brownell wrote:
Actually if you look around, you'll notice usbcore uses about four
different locks (including dev->serialize) to protect critical
sections against changes to device binding ... but the only lock
that's _correct_ to use is usb_bus_type.s
30 matches
Mail list logo
