When plugging a Motorola SurfBoard 5100 device into my box, khubd oopses.
Kernel is stock linux-2.6.5.
Chipset is nForce 2 (OHCI), USB 2 EHCI controller disabled, so just USB 1.1
controller active.
Please CC me if more information would be handy.
Harvested from kernel logs:
ohci_hcd: 2004 Feb 0
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Michael Knigge wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm using an external USB 2.0 Drive with a GeneSys Chipset. What do I
> have to do to get it working reliably? Until now I've changed
> ".max_sectors" to 64 and I've applied the following two patches:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2004/2/8/4
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Daniel Blueman wrote:
> When plugging a Motorola SurfBoard 5100 device into my box, khubd oopses.
> Kernel is stock linux-2.6.5.
>
> Chipset is nForce 2 (OHCI), USB 2 EHCI controller disabled, so just USB 1.1
> controller active.
>
> Please CC me if more information would be
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your great efforts to get external devices with genesys chipset
> working with ehci!
>
> Since Kernel 2.6.4 the device hangs when burning CDs with cdrecord or cdrdao
> during sending the cue-sheet. The only case where this does no
Should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I don't know where else to report this, but I found a very very very
minor bug in the usb gadgets drivers, specifically the file_storage.c
mass storage driver.
In the function do_request_sense(..) it says:
buf[7] = 18 - 7;// Add
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:22:20PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:15:15PM +1000, herbert wrote:
> >
> > The current code is applying the maxusage limit to GUSAGE/SUSAGE. This
> > is incorrect as the number of values is stored in field->report_count,
> > not field->maxusage.
I've made a diff file (against 2.6.6rc3-bk8) adding the developmental
version (rather than the 6 month old stable version) of the ov511
driver, version 2.27. Many more webcams are supported by this driver
than the version included in 2.6.5
Basically, would this be useful to anyone? My Phillips OV5
On Fri, 7 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I don't know where else to report this, but I found a very very very
> minor bug in the usb gadgets drivers, specifically the file_storage.c
> mass storage driver.
>
> In the function do_request_sense(..) it says:
>
> buf[7] = 18 - 7;
Alan Stern wrote:
After a restless night, I've come up with some interesting ideas...
Seems like. But I'll still poke at them ... :)
First, let's acknowledge that in 2.6 we must require drivers not to
interact with a device after their disconnect() has returned. Also, let's
What's "interact"
Alan Stern wrote:
I'm about ready to give up on device reset during probe.
Preventing it would need a per-interface state flag, FWIW;
easily set by usbcore during probe(). Somewhat parallel to
the flag I suggested be held during SET_CONFIGURATION...
Preventing it could be as simple as not writi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
Wouldn't a plain old atomic "BUSY" bitflag work better? If it's set,
usbcore would reject urbs with -EAGAIN ... from all contexts,
including the many that can't acquire semaphores!
Going back a bit--what context were you thinking of that wouldn'
I have built linux 2.6.2 but when I plug in my cable
modem to one of my usb ports i get the following
error:
usbnet: probe of 4-2:1.1 failed with error -75
Anyone got any ideas. Can't find anything on the
internet.
paul.
__
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:49:35AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >David Brownell wrote:
> >
> >>Wouldn't a plain old atomic "BUSY" bitflag work better? If it's set,
> >>usbcore would reject urbs with -EAGAIN ... from all contexts,
> >>including the many that can't acqui
Hasjim Williams wrote:
> There are a number of other OHCI-like embedded host processors, but
> they all have their little quirks. About the only other one worth
> mentioning is the Transdimension TD242 / TD243. Apparently there are
> some other GPL Linux drivers around for those chips, but their
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Zariel Skotlex wrote:
> Ok... I finally managed to snatch my brother's pc for testing (it
> already had Gentoo-Linux installed, but was outdated for a month or
> so). After upgrading the kernel to 2.6.5 and rebooting and bringing
> the pc here to connect it to the cable modem a
emanuel stiebler wrote:
Hasjim Williams wrote:
> There are a number of other OHCI-like embedded host processors, but
> they all have their little quirks. ...
Did anybody have a look at the Cypress SX2 chip (68001) ?
It looks good (at least on paper), but never saw linux drivers
for it, nor anyb
paul cunningham wrote:
I have built linux 2.6.2 but when I plug in my cable
modem to one of my usb ports i get the following
error:
usbnet: probe of 4-2:1.1 failed with error -75
Anyone got any ideas. Can't find anything on the
internet.
error -75 == -EOVERFLOW
and Documentation/usb/error-codes.t
On Thu, 6 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> But...
> >> I put in a printk() at the start of the interrupt handler: uhci_irq()
> >> and it _never_ gets called!... ever!
> >
> >Well, that's bad. Didn't you say before that when the device was
> >coldplugged it would work okay? If there were no
On Fri, 7 May 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > And I can't help thinking that locktree is overkill for almost all cases.
> > Can you name any problems that it solves?
>
> Maybe lock_port() would be a better name, actually.
>
> Consider some cases where subtree B is a desc
On Fri, 7 May 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> > First, let's acknowledge that in 2.6 we must require drivers not to
> > interact with a device after their disconnect() has returned. Also, let's
>
> What's "interact" though? Not usb_put_dev(), clearly...
> I'd certainly agree that starting new I
Well, my kernel is still 2.6.5, so I had to manually apply the patch's
chunks #2 and #3 (after 2.6.6 goes out, I'll try it on that). And this
is what now happens when I plugin the modem:
//---
ehci_hcd :00:02.2: GetStatus port 2 status 001803
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 07:26:31PM +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
>
> This patch seems to break HIDIOCGUCODE for report_type ==
> HID_REPORT_TYPE_INPUT. The following patch (for 2.4) fixes it:
>
> --- linux/drivers/usb/hiddev.c.hiddev-fix-gucode 2004-05-07 19:16:41 +0400
> +++ linux/drivers/us
I have made a first attempt at supporting big endian processors in the USB
gadget RNDIS driver. The attached file is a diff against the current bit
keeper version. I was able to successfully ping a Windows XP host from our
device, but not from the host to our device. I have no past experience w
May 8 10:57:22 b3ast usb 2-2: new full speed USB device using address 2
May 8 10:57:23 b3ast usb-storage: This device (0686,400b,0001 S 06 P
50) has an unneeded SubClass entry in unusual_devs.h
May 8 10:57:23 b3ast Please send a copy of this message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
May 8 10:57:23 b3ast s
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:53:03PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > > Hi Greg, I'm not sure when these problems started showing up, maybe they
> > > have been in 2.6.6- for a while. One patch that may be worth having in
> > > 2.6.6 by the way is the one for device_disconnect in devio.c that changes
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:08:11AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 May 2004 04:04 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:48:07PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > No, I am still getting the oops.. hmm.. it seems a little bit different,
> > > but still in the hidde
As requested:
ov511-2.27 patch file: http://hughsie.no-ip.com/write/ov511-2.27.patch
Please check for sanity before applying.
Richard Hughes
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola,
I have a Toshiba PDR M70 camera that does not work with the Linux
usb-storage driver. The breakage seems to occur when the driver tries to
set up the scsi device. The module then goes into a state where it
cannot be unloaded. I have tried it with 2.6.4 and 2.6.5. Any
suggestions? I am not adve
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus in your email to the following recipient:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery of the email was stopped!
Please check your system for viruses,
or ask your system administrator to do so.
F
A virus was found in a message sent by this
account.
--- Scan information follows ---
Result: Virus Detected
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File Attachment: data17193.zip/msg.eml
.scr
Attachment Sta
Richard Hughes wrote:
I've made a diff file (against 2.6.6rc3-bk8) adding the developmental
version (rather than the 6 month old stable version) of the ov511
driver, version 2.27. Many more webcams are supported by this driver
than the version included in 2.6.5
Yes, an update is definitely over
31 matches
Mail list logo
