On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:20:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:33:52PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Greg, if this doesn't apply to your 2.4.x tree, could you please send me
an updated tarball of your tree?
Applied, minus the BUG_ON() part.
Thanks.
Do you still want
Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
idea?
Damn. Surprised I never noticed this. Confirmed even with my 2.4
patches.
Give me an hour or so and I'll get you a fix.
--
Debian -
Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
idea?
No idea. I'm using a USB keyboard in conjunction with the patch. Let me
try a 2.5.70+bk build tonight to make sure there were no bad
interactions
Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
idea?
My patch alone on 2.4.21-rc4-i386 has working LED's. My patch in your
tree that you sent me with 2.4.21-rc6-sparc64 has broken LED's.
Veeery
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 06:18:13PM -0500, Jordan Breeding wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
idea?
My patch alone on 2.4.21-rc4-i386 has working LED's. My
I've narrowed this down. I'll have a patch shortly.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
idea?
Yep, my patch killed hid-input from scanning HID_OUTPUT_REPORT's. Fixed
with this patch for 2.5.70+bk. I'll send one for 2.4.x in a few minutes.
--- linux/drivers/usb/input/hid-input.c 3 Jun 2003 02:53:07 -
Greg, if this doesn't apply to your 2.4.x tree, could you please send me
an updated tarball of your tree?
--- linux/drivers/usb.new/hid-input.c Thu May 22 22:47:00 2003
+++ linux/drivers/usb/hid-input.c Tue Jun 3 20:35:46 2003
@@ -73,8 +73,11 @@
hidinput =
Found this when working with a HAPP UGCI device. It has a usage with 7
indexes. I could read them all one at a time, but using a multiref it
would only allow me to read the first 6. The patch below fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/drivers/usb/input/hiddev.c
+++ b
Cc: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
index 8c3f55b..89f067d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
Cc: Ganesh Varadarajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c b/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c
index 4df0ec7..7c85be4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
/* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified device */
- { USB_DEVICE(0x049F, 0x0003) },
Is it obvious why this patch is correct? Especially given the
comment just before the line you delete, and the code
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 05:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
/* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified
device */
- { USB_DEVICE(0x049F, 0x0003
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 20:59 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
Various unusual dev entries accumulated from Ubuntu bug reports.
CC: Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NACK. Two fixes I'd like to see fixed.
+/* SanDisk that has a second LUN for a driver ISO, reported
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:17 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Note, I've taken LKML off the CC list anyone interested in this on there is
also on linux-usb-devel. I've also added the usb-storage list.
See rest of response below.
Ben Collins wrote:
+/* SanDisk that has a second LUN for a driver
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:38 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
I don't like to merge these because it means some other user of some new
device can get unintended consequences - but if we don't have access to the
data, it's better than nothing. Were you the person who owned
16 matches
Mail list logo
